Influence of age and race on axial elongation in myopic children: A systematic review and meta-regression.

IF 1.6 4区 医学 Q3 OPHTHALMOLOGY Optometry and Vision Science Pub Date : 2024-09-03 DOI:10.1097/opx.0000000000002176
Noel A Brennan,Wright Shamp,Elizabeth Maynes,Xu Cheng,Mark A Bullimore
{"title":"Influence of age and race on axial elongation in myopic children: A systematic review and meta-regression.","authors":"Noel A Brennan,Wright Shamp,Elizabeth Maynes,Xu Cheng,Mark A Bullimore","doi":"10.1097/opx.0000000000002176","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"PURPOSE\r\nAxial elongation is the basis of progression in primary myopia and the preferred metric to monitor its evolution. We conducted a meta-regression to model axial elongation and its associated factors in children with low to moderate myopia.\r\n\r\nMETHODS\r\nA comprehensive electronic systematic search was performed using Ovid Medline, EMBASE, and Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials of studies conducted up until October 2021. The mean rate of axial elongation was analyzed using a multivariate linear mixed-effects meta-regression model, with backward stepwise elimination of nonsignificant covariates. The model included three levels of random effects, allowing both prediction and confidence intervals to be estimated.\r\n\r\nRESULTS\r\nA total of 64 studies with 83 subpopulations and 142 evaluations of mean axial change from baseline met our inclusion criteria and had no missing significant covariates in the final model. A separate analysis including all populations with axial length data (202 evaluations) but missing variance or covariate data produced a similar model to that for the analysis with complete data. The mean axial elongation is 38% greater in Asian children (95% confidence interval, 19 to 61%; p<0.01) compared with non-Asians, but both groups show a 15% decline per year as age increases (95% confidence interval, 12 to 17% p<0.0001). Prediction intervals indicate substantial variability around the axial elongation estimates.\r\n\r\nCONCLUSIONS\r\nThis analysis provides mean values of axial elongation for evaluation of efficacy of myopia control. The broad prediction intervals emphasize the large range of individual axial elongation rates in the population, illustrating the challenge in managing individual children. Interpretation of the analysis is limited by the use of aggregated data rather than individual subject data.","PeriodicalId":19649,"journal":{"name":"Optometry and Vision Science","volume":"63 1","pages":"497-507"},"PeriodicalIF":1.6000,"publicationDate":"2024-09-03","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Optometry and Vision Science","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1097/opx.0000000000002176","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"OPHTHALMOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

PURPOSE Axial elongation is the basis of progression in primary myopia and the preferred metric to monitor its evolution. We conducted a meta-regression to model axial elongation and its associated factors in children with low to moderate myopia. METHODS A comprehensive electronic systematic search was performed using Ovid Medline, EMBASE, and Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials of studies conducted up until October 2021. The mean rate of axial elongation was analyzed using a multivariate linear mixed-effects meta-regression model, with backward stepwise elimination of nonsignificant covariates. The model included three levels of random effects, allowing both prediction and confidence intervals to be estimated. RESULTS A total of 64 studies with 83 subpopulations and 142 evaluations of mean axial change from baseline met our inclusion criteria and had no missing significant covariates in the final model. A separate analysis including all populations with axial length data (202 evaluations) but missing variance or covariate data produced a similar model to that for the analysis with complete data. The mean axial elongation is 38% greater in Asian children (95% confidence interval, 19 to 61%; p<0.01) compared with non-Asians, but both groups show a 15% decline per year as age increases (95% confidence interval, 12 to 17% p<0.0001). Prediction intervals indicate substantial variability around the axial elongation estimates. CONCLUSIONS This analysis provides mean values of axial elongation for evaluation of efficacy of myopia control. The broad prediction intervals emphasize the large range of individual axial elongation rates in the population, illustrating the challenge in managing individual children. Interpretation of the analysis is limited by the use of aggregated data rather than individual subject data.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
年龄和种族对近视儿童轴伸长的影响:系统回顾与元回归。
目的轴伸长是原发性近视发展的基础,也是监测其演变的首选指标。我们对中低度近视儿童的轴伸长及其相关因素进行了元回归建模。方法使用 Ovid Medline、EMBASE 和 Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials 对截至 2021 年 10 月的研究进行了全面的电子系统检索。采用多变量线性混合效应元回归模型对平均轴伸长率进行分析,并向后逐步剔除不显著的协变量。结果共有 64 项研究、83 个亚人群和 142 次对平均轴向基线变化的评估符合我们的纳入标准,并且在最终模型中没有缺失的重要协变量。一项单独的分析包括了所有有轴向长度数据(202 次评估)但缺失方差或协变量数据的人群,该分析得出的模型与完整数据分析得出的模型相似。与非亚洲人相比,亚洲儿童的平均轴向伸长率高出38%(95%置信区间,19%至61%;P<0.01),但随着年龄的增长,两组儿童的平均轴向伸长率每年均下降15%(95%置信区间,12%至17%;P<0.0001)。预测区间表明,轴向伸长率估计值周围存在很大的变异性。结论这项分析提供了轴向伸长率的平均值,用于评估近视控制的效果。广泛的预测区间强调了人群中个体轴向伸长率的巨大范围,说明了管理个体儿童所面临的挑战。由于使用的是综合数据而非个体数据,因此对分析结果的解释受到了限制。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Optometry and Vision Science
Optometry and Vision Science 医学-眼科学
CiteScore
2.80
自引率
7.10%
发文量
210
审稿时长
3-6 weeks
期刊介绍: Optometry and Vision Science is the monthly peer-reviewed scientific publication of the American Academy of Optometry, publishing original research since 1924. Optometry and Vision Science is an internationally recognized source for education and information on current discoveries in optometry, physiological optics, vision science, and related fields. The journal considers original contributions that advance clinical practice, vision science, and public health. Authors should remember that the journal reaches readers worldwide and their submissions should be relevant and of interest to a broad audience. Topical priorities include, but are not limited to: clinical and laboratory research, evidence-based reviews, contact lenses, ocular growth and refractive error development, eye movements, visual function and perception, biology of the eye and ocular disease, epidemiology and public health, biomedical optics and instrumentation, novel and important clinical observations and treatments, and optometric education.
期刊最新文献
Efficacy comparison of repeated low-level red-light therapy and orthokeratology lenses for myopia control. Exploring cognitive overload in adults with visual impairment: The association between concentration and fatigue. A pilot study of the impact of repeated blink refrainment on ocular surface temperature and the interblink period. Case report: Acute macular neuroretinopathy post-COVID-19 infection. Extended release of ciprofloxacin from commercial silicone-hydrogel and conventional hydrogel contact lenses containing vitamin E diffusion barriers.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1