The Generalized 3+3 (G3+3) Design for Phase I Dose-Finding Trials

Yuan Ji, Yunxuan Zhang, Andrew Liu Ji
{"title":"The Generalized 3+3 (G3+3) Design for Phase I Dose-Finding Trials","authors":"Yuan Ji, Yunxuan Zhang, Andrew Liu Ji","doi":"10.1101/2024.08.18.24312178","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"PURPOSE We propose and demonstrate the feasibility and desirability of a novel model-free dose-finding design for phase I clinical trials. METHODS The Generalized 3+3 (G3+3) design uses a set of simple rules summarized as follows: For 3 or 6 patients at a dose, apply the 3+3 design for making dosing decisions. For other numbers, if the observed toxicity rate (OTR) is less than 0.2, escalate to the next higher dose; if the OTR is greater than 0.29, de-escalate to the next lower dose; otherwise, stay at the current dose. RESULTS The G3+3 design is the only design that can replicate the decisions of the 3+3 design for 3 or 6 patients among the popular designs compared like BOIN and i3+3. G3+3 generates desirable decisions when the number of patients treated is not 3 or 6, like the popular designs. Computer simulation verifies the superior operating characteristics of the G3+3 design. CONCLUSION The G3+3 design generalizes the popular 3+3 design so that desirable decisions can be made for any number of patients at a dose. Since G3+3 does not rely on statistical models, is simple and transparent, and can be implemented without a software tool, it is expected to facilitate and enhance modern phase I dose-finding trials and early-phase drug development.","PeriodicalId":501437,"journal":{"name":"medRxiv - Oncology","volume":"3 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-08-19","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"medRxiv - Oncology","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1101/2024.08.18.24312178","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

PURPOSE We propose and demonstrate the feasibility and desirability of a novel model-free dose-finding design for phase I clinical trials. METHODS The Generalized 3+3 (G3+3) design uses a set of simple rules summarized as follows: For 3 or 6 patients at a dose, apply the 3+3 design for making dosing decisions. For other numbers, if the observed toxicity rate (OTR) is less than 0.2, escalate to the next higher dose; if the OTR is greater than 0.29, de-escalate to the next lower dose; otherwise, stay at the current dose. RESULTS The G3+3 design is the only design that can replicate the decisions of the 3+3 design for 3 or 6 patients among the popular designs compared like BOIN and i3+3. G3+3 generates desirable decisions when the number of patients treated is not 3 or 6, like the popular designs. Computer simulation verifies the superior operating characteristics of the G3+3 design. CONCLUSION The G3+3 design generalizes the popular 3+3 design so that desirable decisions can be made for any number of patients at a dose. Since G3+3 does not rely on statistical models, is simple and transparent, and can be implemented without a software tool, it is expected to facilitate and enhance modern phase I dose-finding trials and early-phase drug development.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
I 期剂量摸底试验的广义 3+3 (G3+3) 设计
目的 我们提出并论证了在 I 期临床试验中采用新型无模型剂量摸底设计的可行性和可取性。方法 通用 3+3 (G3+3) 设计使用一套简单的规则,总结如下:对于一个剂量下的 3 或 6 名患者,采用 3+3 设计来决定给药剂量。对于其他人数,如果观察到的毒性率(OTR)小于 0.2,则升级到下一个较高剂量;如果 OTR 大于 0.29,则降级到下一个较低剂量;否则,保持当前剂量。结果 G3+3 设计是目前比较流行的设计(如 BOIN 和 i3+3)中唯一能复制 3+3 设计对 3 或 6 名患者的决策的设计。当治疗的患者人数不是 3 或 6 人时,G3+3 也能像其他流行设计一样产生理想的决策。计算机模拟验证了 G3+3 设计的卓越运行特性。结论 G3+3 设计推广了流行的 3+3 设计,因此可以对任何剂量下的患者人数做出理想的决策。由于 G3+3 不依赖统计模型,简单透明,无需软件工具即可实现,因此有望促进和加强现代 I 期剂量试验和早期药物开发。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Evaluating Observer Reliability and Diagnostic Accuracy of CT-LEFAT Criteria for Post-Treatment Head and Neck Lymphedema: A Prospective Blinded Comparative Analysis of Oncologist Human Inter-Rater Performance Whole Genome Sequencing and single-cell transcriptomics identify KMT2D as a potential new driver for pituitary adenomas Self Reported Financial Difficulties Among Patients with Multiple Myeloma and Chronis Lymphocytic Leukemia Treated at U.S. Community Oncology Clinics (Alliance A231602CD) First-in-human evaluation of memory-like NK cells with an IL-15 super-agonist and CTLA-4 blockade in advanced head and neck cancer Viral transcript and tumor immune microenvironment-based transcriptomic profiling of HPV-associated head and neck squamous cell carcinoma identifies subtypes associated with prognosis
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1