Incorporating computer vision on smart phone photographs into screening for inflammatory arthritis: results from an Indian patient cohort

Sanat Phatak, Ruchil Saptarshi, Vanshaj Sharma, Rohan Shah, Abhishek Zanwar, Pratiksha Hegde, Somashree Chakraborty, Pranay Goel
{"title":"Incorporating computer vision on smart phone photographs into screening for inflammatory arthritis: results from an Indian patient cohort","authors":"Sanat Phatak, Ruchil Saptarshi, Vanshaj Sharma, Rohan Shah, Abhishek Zanwar, Pratiksha Hegde, Somashree Chakraborty, Pranay Goel","doi":"10.1101/2024.08.19.24312283","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Background: Convolutional neural networks (CNNs) have been used to classify medical images; few studies use smartphone photographs that are scalable at point of care. We previously showed proof of principle that CNNs could detect inflammatory arthritis in three hand joints. We now studied a screening CNN to differentiate from controls. Methods: We studied consecutive patients with early inflammatory arthritis and healthy controls, all examined by a rheumatologist (15% by two). Standardized photographs of the hands were taken using a studio box, anonymized, and cropped around joints. We fine-tuned pre-trained CNN models on our dataset (80% training; 20% test set). We used an Inception-ResNet-v2 backbone CNN modified for two class outputs (Patient vs Control) on uncropped photos. Inception-ResNet-v2 CNNs were trained on cropped photos of Middle finger Proximal Interphalangeal (MFPIP), Index finger PIP (IFPIP) and wrist. We report representative values of accuracy, sensitivity, specificity. Results: We studied 800 hands from 200 controls (mean age 37.8 years) and 200 patients (mean age 49.6 years; 134 with rheumatoid arthritis amongst other diagnoses). Two rheumatologists had a concordance of 0.89 in 404 joints. The wrist was commonly involved (173/400) followed by the MFPIP (134) and IFPIP (128). The screening CNN achieved excellent accuracy (98%), sensitivity (98%) and specificity (98%) in predicting a patient compared to controls. Joint-specific CNN accuracy, sensitivity and specificity were highest for the wrist (80% , 88% , 72%) followed by the IFPIP (79%, 89% ,73%) and MFPIP (76%, 91%, 70%). Conclusion\nComputer vision without feature engineering can distinguish between patients and controls based on smartphone photographs with good accuracy, showing promise as a screening tool prior to joint-specific CNNs. Future research includes validating findings in diverse populations, refining models to improve specificity in joints and integrating this technology into clinical workflows.","PeriodicalId":501212,"journal":{"name":"medRxiv - Rheumatology","volume":"1 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-08-20","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"medRxiv - Rheumatology","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1101/2024.08.19.24312283","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Convolutional neural networks (CNNs) have been used to classify medical images; few studies use smartphone photographs that are scalable at point of care. We previously showed proof of principle that CNNs could detect inflammatory arthritis in three hand joints. We now studied a screening CNN to differentiate from controls. Methods: We studied consecutive patients with early inflammatory arthritis and healthy controls, all examined by a rheumatologist (15% by two). Standardized photographs of the hands were taken using a studio box, anonymized, and cropped around joints. We fine-tuned pre-trained CNN models on our dataset (80% training; 20% test set). We used an Inception-ResNet-v2 backbone CNN modified for two class outputs (Patient vs Control) on uncropped photos. Inception-ResNet-v2 CNNs were trained on cropped photos of Middle finger Proximal Interphalangeal (MFPIP), Index finger PIP (IFPIP) and wrist. We report representative values of accuracy, sensitivity, specificity. Results: We studied 800 hands from 200 controls (mean age 37.8 years) and 200 patients (mean age 49.6 years; 134 with rheumatoid arthritis amongst other diagnoses). Two rheumatologists had a concordance of 0.89 in 404 joints. The wrist was commonly involved (173/400) followed by the MFPIP (134) and IFPIP (128). The screening CNN achieved excellent accuracy (98%), sensitivity (98%) and specificity (98%) in predicting a patient compared to controls. Joint-specific CNN accuracy, sensitivity and specificity were highest for the wrist (80% , 88% , 72%) followed by the IFPIP (79%, 89% ,73%) and MFPIP (76%, 91%, 70%). Conclusion Computer vision without feature engineering can distinguish between patients and controls based on smartphone photographs with good accuracy, showing promise as a screening tool prior to joint-specific CNNs. Future research includes validating findings in diverse populations, refining models to improve specificity in joints and integrating this technology into clinical workflows.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
将智能手机照片的计算机视觉技术纳入炎症性关节炎筛查:印度患者队列得出的结果
背景:卷积神经网络(CNN)已被用于对医学图像进行分类;但很少有研究使用可在医疗点扩展的智能手机照片。我们之前证明了卷积神经网络可以检测三个手关节的炎症性关节炎。现在,我们研究了一种筛选 CNN,以区分对照组。研究方法我们研究了连续的早期炎症性关节炎患者和健康对照组,所有患者均由一名风湿病专家(15% 由两名风湿病专家组成)进行检查。我们使用摄影箱拍摄了标准化的手部照片,经过匿名处理,并对关节周围进行了裁剪。我们在数据集(80% 训练集;20% 测试集)上对预训练的 CNN 模型进行了微调。我们使用 Inception-ResNet-v2 骨干 CNN 对未裁剪照片的两类输出(患者与对照组)进行了修改。Inception-ResNet-v2 CNN 在中指近端指骨间 (MFPIP)、食指 PIP (IFPIP) 和手腕的裁剪照片上进行了训练。我们报告了准确性、灵敏度和特异性的代表值。结果:我们对 200 名对照组(平均年龄 37.8 岁)和 200 名患者(平均年龄 49.6 岁;134 人患有类风湿性关节炎和其他疾病)的 800 只手进行了研究。两位风湿病学家对 404 个关节的一致性为 0.89。腕关节最常受累(173/400),其次是MFPIP(134)和IFPIP(128)。与对照组相比,筛查 CNN 预测患者的准确性(98%)、灵敏度(98%)和特异性(98%)都非常高。针对特定关节的 CNN 准确性、灵敏度和特异性在手腕(80%、88%、72%)上最高,其次是 IFPIP(79%、89%、73%)和 MFPIP(76%、91%、70%)。结论 无需特征工程的计算机视觉可以根据智能手机照片准确区分患者和对照组,显示出作为关节特异性 CNN 之前的筛查工具的前景。未来的研究包括在不同人群中验证研究结果,改进模型以提高关节的特异性,以及将这项技术整合到临床工作流程中。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Mosaic loss of chromosome Y characterizes late-onset rheumatoid arthritis and contrasting associations of polygenic risk score based on age at onset. Use of Metagenomic Microbial Plasma Cell-Free DNA Next-Generation Sequencing Assay in Outpatient Rheumatology Practice Proteomic profiling of the large vessel vasculitis spectrum identifies shared signatures of innate immune activation and stromal remodelling Pre-trained convolutional neural network with transfer learning by artificial illustrated images classify power Doppler ultrasound images of rheumatoid arthritis joints Associations between exposure to OPEs and rheumatoid arthritis risk among adults in NHANES, 2011-2018
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1