Comment on “Excluding Primordial Black Holes as Dark Matter Based on Solar System Ephemeris”

James M. Cline
{"title":"Comment on “Excluding Primordial Black Holes as Dark Matter Based on Solar System Ephemeris”","authors":"James M. Cline","doi":"10.3847/2515-5172/ad7674","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"It was recently claimed (<ext-link ext-link-type=\"arxiv\" xlink:href=\"https://arxiv.org/pdf/2408.10799\" xlink:type=\"simple\">https://arxiv.org/pdf/2408.10799</ext-link>) that solar system ephemeris data can exclude primordial black hole (PBH) dark matter in the mass range 10<sup>18</sup>–10<sup>22</sup> g. I show that this conclusion is based on an implausible, implicit assumption; namely the uncertainty on the solar system mass within 50 au is as small as the uncertainty on the mass of the Sun. Correcting for this error, I find that ephemeris data can only constrain PBH’s with mass below 10<sup>16</sup> g, which is already excluded by constraints on their evaporation via Hawking radiation. Correcting a further error concerning the time-averaged rate of such fluctuations nullifies even this weaker constraint.","PeriodicalId":74684,"journal":{"name":"Research notes of the AAS","volume":"61 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-09-06","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Research notes of the AAS","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3847/2515-5172/ad7674","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

It was recently claimed (https://arxiv.org/pdf/2408.10799) that solar system ephemeris data can exclude primordial black hole (PBH) dark matter in the mass range 1018–1022 g. I show that this conclusion is based on an implausible, implicit assumption; namely the uncertainty on the solar system mass within 50 au is as small as the uncertainty on the mass of the Sun. Correcting for this error, I find that ephemeris data can only constrain PBH’s with mass below 1016 g, which is already excluded by constraints on their evaporation via Hawking radiation. Correcting a further error concerning the time-averaged rate of such fluctuations nullifies even this weaker constraint.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
关于 "根据太阳系星历排除作为暗物质的原始黑洞 "的评论
最近有人声称(https://arxiv.org/pdf/2408.10799),太阳系星历数据可以排除质量范围在1018-1022 g的原始黑洞(PBH)暗物质。我的研究表明,这一结论是基于一个难以置信的隐含假设:即太阳系质量在 50 au 范围内的不确定性与太阳质量的不确定性一样小。修正这一误差后,我发现星历表数据只能约束质量低于1016 g的PBH,而通过霍金辐射对其蒸发的约束已经排除了这一质量。修正有关这种波动的时间平均速率的进一步误差,甚至会使这种较弱的约束失效。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Landed Planetary Sensor Model Support with the Community Sensor Model New Pulsating Variable Stars and Eclipsing Binaries Around BL Cam* A Strong Lensing Model of RCS1 J0224−0002.5 New Transit Timing Observations of WASP-12b from TESS Sectors 71 and 72 New Sample of Ultracool Dwarf Benchmarks with Detailed Chemical Characterization
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1