Technically feasible solutions to challenges in preimplantation genetic testing for thalassemia: experiences of multiple centers between 2019 and 2022

IF 3.2 3区 医学 Q2 GENETICS & HEREDITY Journal of Assisted Reproduction and Genetics Pub Date : 2024-09-10 DOI:10.1007/s10815-024-03240-4
Zi Ren, Peng Huang, Yong Wang, Yaxin Yao, Jun Ren, Linan Xu, Jinhui Shu, Liang Zhou, Dunmei Zhao, Xiaolan Li, Zhiqiang Zhang, Chunhui Zhang, Bolan Sun, Sijia Lu, Weiping Qian, Hong Zhou, Cong Fang
{"title":"Technically feasible solutions to challenges in preimplantation genetic testing for thalassemia: experiences of multiple centers between 2019 and 2022","authors":"Zi Ren, Peng Huang, Yong Wang, Yaxin Yao, Jun Ren, Linan Xu, Jinhui Shu, Liang Zhou, Dunmei Zhao, Xiaolan Li, Zhiqiang Zhang, Chunhui Zhang, Bolan Sun, Sijia Lu, Weiping Qian, Hong Zhou, Cong Fang","doi":"10.1007/s10815-024-03240-4","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<h3 data-test=\"abstract-sub-heading\">Purpose</h3><p>In clinical practice, the success of preimplantation genetic testing for monogenic diseases (PGT-M) for thalassemia was hindered by the absence of probands, incomplete family members, or failure in detecting embryonic gene mutation sites. This study aimed to address these issues.</p><h3 data-test=\"abstract-sub-heading\">Methods</h3><p>This retrospective study included 342 couples undergoing PGT-M for α- or β-thalassemia at three reproductive medicine centers from 2019 to 2022. Various methods were used to construct parental haplotypes. A total of 1778 embryos were analyzed and selected for transfer based on chromosomal ploidy and PGT-M results. Follow-up involved amniocentesis results and clinical outcomes.</p><h3 data-test=\"abstract-sub-heading\">Results</h3><p>Haplotypes were established using DNA samples from probands or parents, as well as sibling blood samples, single sperm, and affected embryos, achieving an overall success rate was 99.4% (340/342). For α-thalassemia and β-thalassemia, the concordance between embryo single nucleotide polymorphism (SNP) haplotype analysis results and mutation loci detection results was 93.8% (1011/1078) and 98.2% (538/548), respectively. Multiple annealing and looping-based amplification cycles (MALBAC) showed a higher whole genome amplification success rate than multiple displacement amplification (MDA) (98.8% (1031/1044) vs. 96.2% (703/731), <i>p</i> &lt; 0.001). Amniocentesis confirmed PGT-M outcomes in 100% of cases followed up (99/99).</p><h3 data-test=\"abstract-sub-heading\">Conclusion</h3><p>This study summarizes feasible solutions to various challenging scenarios encountered in PGT-M for thalassemia, providing valuable insights to enhance success rate of PGT-M in clinical practice.</p><h3 data-test=\"abstract-sub-heading\">Graphical Abstract</h3>\n","PeriodicalId":15246,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Assisted Reproduction and Genetics","volume":"26 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":3.2000,"publicationDate":"2024-09-10","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Assisted Reproduction and Genetics","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s10815-024-03240-4","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"GENETICS & HEREDITY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Purpose

In clinical practice, the success of preimplantation genetic testing for monogenic diseases (PGT-M) for thalassemia was hindered by the absence of probands, incomplete family members, or failure in detecting embryonic gene mutation sites. This study aimed to address these issues.

Methods

This retrospective study included 342 couples undergoing PGT-M for α- or β-thalassemia at three reproductive medicine centers from 2019 to 2022. Various methods were used to construct parental haplotypes. A total of 1778 embryos were analyzed and selected for transfer based on chromosomal ploidy and PGT-M results. Follow-up involved amniocentesis results and clinical outcomes.

Results

Haplotypes were established using DNA samples from probands or parents, as well as sibling blood samples, single sperm, and affected embryos, achieving an overall success rate was 99.4% (340/342). For α-thalassemia and β-thalassemia, the concordance between embryo single nucleotide polymorphism (SNP) haplotype analysis results and mutation loci detection results was 93.8% (1011/1078) and 98.2% (538/548), respectively. Multiple annealing and looping-based amplification cycles (MALBAC) showed a higher whole genome amplification success rate than multiple displacement amplification (MDA) (98.8% (1031/1044) vs. 96.2% (703/731), p < 0.001). Amniocentesis confirmed PGT-M outcomes in 100% of cases followed up (99/99).

Conclusion

This study summarizes feasible solutions to various challenging scenarios encountered in PGT-M for thalassemia, providing valuable insights to enhance success rate of PGT-M in clinical practice.

Graphical Abstract

Abstract Image

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
地中海贫血植入前基因检测挑战的技术可行解决方案:2019 年至 2022 年期间多个中心的经验
目的在临床实践中,地中海贫血症的单基因疾病植入前基因检测(PGT-M)的成功率因缺乏原型、家庭成员不完整或未能检测到胚胎基因突变位点而受到阻碍。这项回顾性研究纳入了2019年至2022年期间在三家生殖医学中心接受α或β地中海贫血PGT-M检查的342对夫妇。采用各种方法构建亲本单倍型。根据染色体倍性和PGT-M结果,共分析并选择了1778个胚胎进行移植。随访内容包括羊膜腔穿刺结果和临床结果。结果单倍型的建立使用了来自原核或父母、同胞血样、单精子和受影响胚胎的 DNA 样本,总体成功率为 99.4%(340/342)。对于α地中海贫血和β地中海贫血,胚胎单核苷酸多态性(SNP)单体型分析结果与突变位点检测结果的一致性分别为93.8%(1011/1078)和98.2%(538/548)。基于多重退火和循环扩增循环(MALBAC)的全基因组扩增成功率高于多重位移扩增(MDA)(98.8% (1031/1044) vs. 96.2% (703/731),p < 0.001)。结论本研究总结了地中海贫血 PGT-M 中遇到的各种挑战性情况的可行解决方案,为提高临床实践中 PGT-M 的成功率提供了宝贵的见解。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
5.70
自引率
9.70%
发文量
286
审稿时长
1 months
期刊介绍: The Journal of Assisted Reproduction and Genetics publishes cellular, molecular, genetic, and epigenetic discoveries advancing our understanding of the biology and underlying mechanisms from gametogenesis to offspring health. Special emphasis is placed on the practice and evolution of assisted reproduction technologies (ARTs) with reference to the diagnosis and management of diseases affecting fertility. Our goal is to educate our readership in the translation of basic and clinical discoveries made from human or relevant animal models to the safe and efficacious practice of human ARTs. The scientific rigor and ethical standards embraced by the JARG editorial team ensures a broad international base of expertise guiding the marriage of contemporary clinical research paradigms with basic science discovery. JARG publishes original papers, minireviews, case reports, and opinion pieces often combined into special topic issues that will educate clinicians and scientists with interests in the mechanisms of human development that bear on the treatment of infertility and emerging innovations in human ARTs. The guiding principles of male and female reproductive health impacting pre- and post-conceptional viability and developmental potential are emphasized within the purview of human reproductive health in current and future generations of our species. The journal is published in cooperation with the American Society for Reproductive Medicine, an organization of more than 8,000 physicians, researchers, nurses, technicians and other professionals dedicated to advancing knowledge and expertise in reproductive biology.
期刊最新文献
The impact of Duostim protocol on pregnancy outcomes in infertile patients: A meta-analysis comparing single and double conventional stimulation cycles. Effect of zinc on sperm recovered by swim-up. The nexus between gamete donation and cryobiology in ARTs: Avoiding the unavoidable. Phenotypic impact of CFTR mutations on male reproductive tract agenesis in a Chinese cohort with congenital absence of the vas deferens. A novel homozygous mutation in the NLRP2 gene causes early embryonic arrest.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1