Bo Wu, Gang Yao, Qingqing Zheng, Fenglin Niu, Di Wu
{"title":"Improved elastic full‐waveform inversion of ocean bottom node data","authors":"Bo Wu, Gang Yao, Qingqing Zheng, Fenglin Niu, Di Wu","doi":"10.1111/1365-2478.13601","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Elastic full‐waveform inversion enables the quantitative inversion of multiple subsurface parameters, significantly enhancing the interpretation of subsurface lithology. Simultaneously, with the ongoing advancements in ocean bottom node technology, the application of elastic full‐waveform inversion to marine ocean bottom node data is receiving increasing attention. This is attributed to the capability of ocean bottom node to acquire high‐quality four‐component data. However, elastic full‐waveform inversion of ocean bottom node data typically encounters two challenges: First, the presence of low S‐wave velocity layers in the seabed leads to weak energy of converted S‐waves, resulting in significantly poorer inversion results for S‐wave velocity compared to those for P‐wave velocity; second, the cross‐talk effect of multiple parameters further exacerbates the difficulty in inverting S‐wave velocity. To effectively recover the S‐wave velocity using ocean bottom node data, we modify the S‐wave velocity gradient in conventional elastic full‐waveform inversion to alleviate the impact of cross‐talk from multiple parameters on the inversion of S‐wave velocity. Furthermore, to invert for density parameters, we adopt a two‐stage inversion strategy. In the first stage, P‐wave and S‐wave velocities are updated simultaneously with a single‐step length. Because the initial density model is far from the true one, density is updated using an empirical relationship derived from well‐log data. In the second stage, velocities and density are updated simultaneously with multi‐step length to further refine the models obtained in the first stage. The high effectiveness of the improved elastic full‐waveform inversion is validated by numerical examples.","PeriodicalId":12793,"journal":{"name":"Geophysical Prospecting","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":1.8000,"publicationDate":"2024-09-03","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Geophysical Prospecting","FirstCategoryId":"89","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1111/1365-2478.13601","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"地球科学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"GEOCHEMISTRY & GEOPHYSICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Elastic full‐waveform inversion enables the quantitative inversion of multiple subsurface parameters, significantly enhancing the interpretation of subsurface lithology. Simultaneously, with the ongoing advancements in ocean bottom node technology, the application of elastic full‐waveform inversion to marine ocean bottom node data is receiving increasing attention. This is attributed to the capability of ocean bottom node to acquire high‐quality four‐component data. However, elastic full‐waveform inversion of ocean bottom node data typically encounters two challenges: First, the presence of low S‐wave velocity layers in the seabed leads to weak energy of converted S‐waves, resulting in significantly poorer inversion results for S‐wave velocity compared to those for P‐wave velocity; second, the cross‐talk effect of multiple parameters further exacerbates the difficulty in inverting S‐wave velocity. To effectively recover the S‐wave velocity using ocean bottom node data, we modify the S‐wave velocity gradient in conventional elastic full‐waveform inversion to alleviate the impact of cross‐talk from multiple parameters on the inversion of S‐wave velocity. Furthermore, to invert for density parameters, we adopt a two‐stage inversion strategy. In the first stage, P‐wave and S‐wave velocities are updated simultaneously with a single‐step length. Because the initial density model is far from the true one, density is updated using an empirical relationship derived from well‐log data. In the second stage, velocities and density are updated simultaneously with multi‐step length to further refine the models obtained in the first stage. The high effectiveness of the improved elastic full‐waveform inversion is validated by numerical examples.
弹性全波形反演能够定量反演多个地下参数,大大提高了对地下岩性的解释能力。与此同时,随着海底节点技术的不断进步,弹性全波形反演在海洋海底节点数据中的应用日益受到重视。这归功于海底节点获取高质量四分量数据的能力。然而,海底节点数据的弹性全波形反演通常会遇到两个挑战:首先,海底存在低 S 波速度层,导致转换 S 波的能量较弱,从而导致 S 波速度的反演结果明显不如 P 波速度的反演结果;其次,多参数的串扰效应进一步加剧了 S 波速度反演的难度。为了利用海底节点数据有效恢复 S 波速度,我们修改了传统弹性全波形反演中的 S 波速度梯度,以减轻多参数串扰对 S 波速度反演的影响。此外,为了反演密度参数,我们采用了两阶段反演策略。在第一阶段,以单步长度同时更新 P 波和 S 波速度。由于初始密度模型与真实密度模型相差甚远,因此密度的更新采用了从井记录数据中得出的经验关系。在第二阶段,速度和密度同时以多步长度更新,以进一步完善第一阶段获得的模型。改进后的弹性全波形反演的高效性通过数值实例得到了验证。
期刊介绍:
Geophysical Prospecting publishes the best in primary research on the science of geophysics as it applies to the exploration, evaluation and extraction of earth resources. Drawing heavily on contributions from researchers in the oil and mineral exploration industries, the journal has a very practical slant. Although the journal provides a valuable forum for communication among workers in these fields, it is also ideally suited to researchers in academic geophysics.