Principal component analysis biplot visualization of electromyogram features for submaximal muscle strength grading

IF 7 2区 医学 Q1 BIOLOGY Computers in biology and medicine Pub Date : 2024-09-14 DOI:10.1016/j.compbiomed.2024.109142
{"title":"Principal component analysis biplot visualization of electromyogram features for submaximal muscle strength grading","authors":"","doi":"10.1016/j.compbiomed.2024.109142","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Background</h3><p>Submaximal muscle strength grading is clinically significant to monitor the progress of rehabilitation. Especially muscle strength grading of core back muscles is challenging using the conventional manual muscle testing (MMT) methods. The muscles are crucial to recovery from back pain, spinal cord injury, stroke and other related diseases. The subjective nature of MMT, adds more ambiguity to grade fine progressions in submaximal strength levels involving 4-, 4 and 4+ grades. Electromyogram (EMG) has been widely used as a quantitative measure to provide insight into the progress of muscle strength. However, several EMG features have been reported in previous studies, and the selection of suitable features pertaining to the problem has remained a challenge.</p></div><div><h3>Method</h3><p>Principal Component Analysis (PCA) biplot visualization is employed in this study to select EMG features that highlight fine changes in muscle strength spanning the submaximal range. Features that offer maximum loading in the principal component subspace, as observed in the PCA biplot, are selected for grading submaximal strength.</p><p>The performance of the proposed feature set is compared with conventional Principal Component (PC) scores. Submaximal muscle strength grades of 4-, 4, 4+ or 5 are assigned using K-means and Gaussian mixture model clustering methods. Clustering performance of the two feature selection methods is compared using the silhouette score metric.</p></div><div><h3>Results</h3><p>The proposed feature set from biplot visualization involving Root Mean Square (RMS) EMG and Waveform Length in combination with Gaussian Mixture Model (GMM) clustering method was observed to offer maximum accuracy. Muscle-wise mean Silhouette Index (SI) scores (p &lt; 0.05) of .81, .74 (Longissimus thoracis left, right) and .73, .77 (Iliocostalis lumborum left, right) were observed. Similarly grade wise mean SI scores (p &lt; 0.05) of .80, .76, .73, and .981 for grades 4-, 4, 4+, and 5 respectively, were observed.</p></div><div><h3>Conclusion</h3><p>The study addresses the problem of selecting minimum features that offer maximum variability for EMG assisted submaximal muscle strength grading. The proposed method emphasizes using biplot visualization to overcome the difficulty in choosing appropriate EMG features of the core back muscles that significantly distinguishes between grades 4-, 4, 4+ and 5.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":10578,"journal":{"name":"Computers in biology and medicine","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":7.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-09-14","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Computers in biology and medicine","FirstCategoryId":"5","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0010482524012277","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"BIOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background

Submaximal muscle strength grading is clinically significant to monitor the progress of rehabilitation. Especially muscle strength grading of core back muscles is challenging using the conventional manual muscle testing (MMT) methods. The muscles are crucial to recovery from back pain, spinal cord injury, stroke and other related diseases. The subjective nature of MMT, adds more ambiguity to grade fine progressions in submaximal strength levels involving 4-, 4 and 4+ grades. Electromyogram (EMG) has been widely used as a quantitative measure to provide insight into the progress of muscle strength. However, several EMG features have been reported in previous studies, and the selection of suitable features pertaining to the problem has remained a challenge.

Method

Principal Component Analysis (PCA) biplot visualization is employed in this study to select EMG features that highlight fine changes in muscle strength spanning the submaximal range. Features that offer maximum loading in the principal component subspace, as observed in the PCA biplot, are selected for grading submaximal strength.

The performance of the proposed feature set is compared with conventional Principal Component (PC) scores. Submaximal muscle strength grades of 4-, 4, 4+ or 5 are assigned using K-means and Gaussian mixture model clustering methods. Clustering performance of the two feature selection methods is compared using the silhouette score metric.

Results

The proposed feature set from biplot visualization involving Root Mean Square (RMS) EMG and Waveform Length in combination with Gaussian Mixture Model (GMM) clustering method was observed to offer maximum accuracy. Muscle-wise mean Silhouette Index (SI) scores (p < 0.05) of .81, .74 (Longissimus thoracis left, right) and .73, .77 (Iliocostalis lumborum left, right) were observed. Similarly grade wise mean SI scores (p < 0.05) of .80, .76, .73, and .981 for grades 4-, 4, 4+, and 5 respectively, were observed.

Conclusion

The study addresses the problem of selecting minimum features that offer maximum variability for EMG assisted submaximal muscle strength grading. The proposed method emphasizes using biplot visualization to overcome the difficulty in choosing appropriate EMG features of the core back muscles that significantly distinguishes between grades 4-, 4, 4+ and 5.

Abstract Image

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
主成分分析双图谱可视化肌电图特征,用于亚极限肌力分级
背景次最大肌力分级对监测康复进展具有重要的临床意义。特别是背部核心肌肉的肌力分级,使用传统的人工肌肉测试(MMT)方法具有挑战性。这些肌肉对背痛、脊髓损伤、中风和其他相关疾病的康复至关重要。手动肌肉测试法的主观性使其在亚极限力量水平上的细微进步分级更加模糊,包括 4 级、4 级和 4+ 级。肌电图(EMG)作为一种定量测量方法,已被广泛应用于深入了解肌肉力量的进展情况。本研究采用了主成分分析(PCA)双图可视化方法来选择肌电图特征,以突出跨次极限范围肌力的细微变化。在 PCA 双图中观察到的在主成分子空间中提供最大负载的特征被选中用于亚极限强度分级。使用 K-均值和高斯混合模型聚类方法将次极限肌力分级为 4-、4、4+ 或 5 级。使用剪影得分指标对两种特征选择方法的聚类性能进行了比较。结果发现,结合高斯混合模型(GMM)聚类方法的双图可视化特征集(包括肌电图均方根(RMS)和波形长度)具有最高的准确性。观察到肌肉平均轮廓指数(SI)得分(p < 0.05)分别为.81、.74(左胸长肌、右胸长肌)和.73、.77(左腰髂肌、右腰髂肌)。同样,4 级、4 级、4+ 级和 5 级的等级平均 SI 分数(p < 0.05)分别为 0.80、0.76、0.73 和 0.981。所提出的方法强调使用双图可视化来克服选择适当的背部核心肌肉 EMG 特征的困难,从而显著区分 4 级、4 级、4+ 级和 5 级。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Computers in biology and medicine
Computers in biology and medicine 工程技术-工程:生物医学
CiteScore
11.70
自引率
10.40%
发文量
1086
审稿时长
74 days
期刊介绍: Computers in Biology and Medicine is an international forum for sharing groundbreaking advancements in the use of computers in bioscience and medicine. This journal serves as a medium for communicating essential research, instruction, ideas, and information regarding the rapidly evolving field of computer applications in these domains. By encouraging the exchange of knowledge, we aim to facilitate progress and innovation in the utilization of computers in biology and medicine.
期刊最新文献
Lightweight medical image segmentation network with multi-scale feature-guided fusion. Shuffled ECA-Net for stress detection from multimodal wearable sensor data. Stacking based ensemble learning framework for identification of nitrotyrosine sites. Two-stage deep learning framework for occlusal crown depth image generation. A joint analysis proposal of nonlinear longitudinal and time-to-event right-, interval-censored data for modeling pregnancy miscarriage.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1