Optimal Correction Strategy of Image Guided Radiation Therapy Including the Paraortic Lymph Node Region in Patients With Cervical Cancers

IF 2.2 Q3 ONCOLOGY Advances in Radiation Oncology Pub Date : 2024-08-10 DOI:10.1016/j.adro.2024.101590
Kazuki Wakabayashi PhD , Makoto Hirata PhD , Hajime Monzen PhD , Takaya Inagaki MD , Tetsuo Sonomura MD, PhD
{"title":"Optimal Correction Strategy of Image Guided Radiation Therapy Including the Paraortic Lymph Node Region in Patients With Cervical Cancers","authors":"Kazuki Wakabayashi PhD ,&nbsp;Makoto Hirata PhD ,&nbsp;Hajime Monzen PhD ,&nbsp;Takaya Inagaki MD ,&nbsp;Tetsuo Sonomura MD, PhD","doi":"10.1016/j.adro.2024.101590","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Purpose</h3><p>The clinically accepted planning target volume margin for radiation therapy to the paraortic nodal region in cervical cancer patients is 5 mm. However, the comprehensive alignment and variability from the pelvic bone to all lumbar vertebrae are undetermined. This study aims to quantify the residual setup errors between the pelvic bone and lumbar vertebrae and determine the optimal correction strategy for patients with cervical cancer.</p></div><div><h3>Materials and Methods</h3><p>Fifteen patients underwent pretreatment mega-voltage computed tomography scans (375 total fractions). Residual setup errors and required margins for each lumbar vertebra were calculated based on registrations accounting for pelvic rotation and translation.</p></div><div><h3>Results</h3><p>The systematic residual errors (1 SD) at L1, L2, L3, L4, and L5 using pelvic bone registration were 6.5, 4.9, 3.1, 1.5, and 0.6 mm in the anterior-posterior (AP) direction, 3.1, 2.3, 1.4, 0.6, and 0.3 mm in the right-left direction, and 2.7, 2.2, 1.7, 1.0, and 0.5 mm in the superior-inferior direction, respectively. The residual setup errors were the largest in the AP direction. Registration based on the pelvic bone required margins in the AP direction of 16.0, 12.1, 7.7, 3.6, and 1.3 mm for L1, L2, L3, L4, and L5, respectively, whereas registration based on L3 required margins of 8.8, 4.8, 4.4, 7.1, and 7.7 mm for L1, L2, L4, L5, and pelvic bone, respectively.</p></div><div><h3>Conclusions</h3><p>Considerable local setup variability was found in patients with cervical cancer. After reviewing the corrective strategies, we determined that L3-based registration effectively minimized the required margins.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":7390,"journal":{"name":"Advances in Radiation Oncology","volume":"9 10","pages":"Article 101590"},"PeriodicalIF":2.2000,"publicationDate":"2024-08-10","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2452109424001532/pdfft?md5=a23932bd7bb3450bafaee5bff06a827c&pid=1-s2.0-S2452109424001532-main.pdf","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Advances in Radiation Oncology","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2452109424001532","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"ONCOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Purpose

The clinically accepted planning target volume margin for radiation therapy to the paraortic nodal region in cervical cancer patients is 5 mm. However, the comprehensive alignment and variability from the pelvic bone to all lumbar vertebrae are undetermined. This study aims to quantify the residual setup errors between the pelvic bone and lumbar vertebrae and determine the optimal correction strategy for patients with cervical cancer.

Materials and Methods

Fifteen patients underwent pretreatment mega-voltage computed tomography scans (375 total fractions). Residual setup errors and required margins for each lumbar vertebra were calculated based on registrations accounting for pelvic rotation and translation.

Results

The systematic residual errors (1 SD) at L1, L2, L3, L4, and L5 using pelvic bone registration were 6.5, 4.9, 3.1, 1.5, and 0.6 mm in the anterior-posterior (AP) direction, 3.1, 2.3, 1.4, 0.6, and 0.3 mm in the right-left direction, and 2.7, 2.2, 1.7, 1.0, and 0.5 mm in the superior-inferior direction, respectively. The residual setup errors were the largest in the AP direction. Registration based on the pelvic bone required margins in the AP direction of 16.0, 12.1, 7.7, 3.6, and 1.3 mm for L1, L2, L3, L4, and L5, respectively, whereas registration based on L3 required margins of 8.8, 4.8, 4.4, 7.1, and 7.7 mm for L1, L2, L4, L5, and pelvic bone, respectively.

Conclusions

Considerable local setup variability was found in patients with cervical cancer. After reviewing the corrective strategies, we determined that L3-based registration effectively minimized the required margins.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
包括腹主动脉旁淋巴结区域在内的宫颈癌患者图像引导放射治疗的最佳校正策略
目的 临床上接受的宫颈癌患者腹主动脉旁结节区放射治疗计划目标容积余量为 5 毫米。然而,从盆骨到所有腰椎的全面对准和可变性尚未确定。本研究旨在量化盆骨和腰椎之间的残余设置误差,并确定宫颈癌患者的最佳矫正策略。根据骨盆旋转和平移注册计算出每个腰椎的残余设置误差和所需边缘。前后(AP)方向的系统残余误差分别为 6.5、4.9、3.1、1.5 和 0.6 毫米,左右方向的系统残余误差分别为 3.1、2.3、1.4、0.6 和 0.3 毫米,上下方向的系统残余误差分别为 2.7、2.2、1.7、1.0 和 0.5 毫米。AP 方向的残余设置误差最大。以盆腔骨为基础进行配准,L1、L2、L3、L4 和 L5 在 AP 方向的边缘分别为 16.0、12.1、7.7、3.6 和 1.3 毫米,而以 L3 为基础进行配准,L1、L2、L4、L5 和盆腔骨的边缘分别为 8.8、4.8、4.4、7.1 和 7.7 毫米。在对纠正策略进行审查后,我们确定基于 L3 的套准可有效减少所需的边缘。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Advances in Radiation Oncology
Advances in Radiation Oncology Medicine-Radiology, Nuclear Medicine and Imaging
CiteScore
4.60
自引率
4.30%
发文量
208
审稿时长
98 days
期刊介绍: The purpose of Advances is to provide information for clinicians who use radiation therapy by publishing: Clinical trial reports and reanalyses. Basic science original reports. Manuscripts examining health services research, comparative and cost effectiveness research, and systematic reviews. Case reports documenting unusual problems and solutions. High quality multi and single institutional series, as well as other novel retrospective hypothesis generating series. Timely critical reviews on important topics in radiation oncology, such as side effects. Articles reporting the natural history of disease and patterns of failure, particularly as they relate to treatment volume delineation. Articles on safety and quality in radiation therapy. Essays on clinical experience. Articles on practice transformation in radiation oncology, in particular: Aspects of health policy that may impact the future practice of radiation oncology. How information technology, such as data analytics and systems innovations, will change radiation oncology practice. Articles on imaging as they relate to radiation therapy treatment.
期刊最新文献
Benefit of Avasopasem Manganese on Severe Oral Mucositis in Head and Neck Cancer in the ROMAN Trial: Unplanned Secondary Analysis A Predictive Nomogram for Development of Lymph Node Metastasis in Muscle-Invasive Bladder Cancer Following Neoadjuvant Therapy Outcomes After Stereotactic Body Radiation for Hepatocellular Carcinoma in Patients With Child-Pugh A Versus Child-Pugh B/C Cirrhosis Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer With Brain Metastases and Concomitant Listeria Monocytogenes Brain Abscesses Editorial board
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1