Investigating synergy between beta-blockers and transarterial chemoembolization in the treatment of hepatocellular carcinoma: preliminary data from a propensity matched analysis

IF 1.8 4区 医学 Q3 RADIOLOGY, NUCLEAR MEDICINE & MEDICAL IMAGING Clinical Imaging Pub Date : 2024-09-10 DOI:10.1016/j.clinimag.2024.110283
{"title":"Investigating synergy between beta-blockers and transarterial chemoembolization in the treatment of hepatocellular carcinoma: preliminary data from a propensity matched analysis","authors":"","doi":"10.1016/j.clinimag.2024.110283","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Purpose</h3><p>Favorable clinical outcomes have been reported with the adjunct use of beta-blockers in cancer treatment, hypothetically secondary to their anti-angiogenic/anti-proliferative effects. Hereby, we investigate whether there is synergy between beta-blockers and TACE in the treatment of HCC.</p></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><p>36 HCC patients on beta-blockers (mean dose of 48 mg daily) at the time of first-line treatment with TACE at our institution were retrospectively identified out of a cohort of 221 patients between 2008 and 2019. Using propensity scoring, a matched cohort of 36 patients not exposed to beta-blockers was generated based on age, gender, ethnicity, etiology of liver disease, BCLC, child Pugh score, PS/ECOG, cirrhosis, largest mass treated, type of TACE and treated liver segments. Tumor response was assessed at 1st and 2nd post-TACE imaging timepoints (1.4 and 4.1 months on average respectively). Variables were compared using chi-square test and Student's <em>t</em>-test. Kaplan-Meier transplant-free survival plots were generated using IBM® SPSS® software. Cox regression analysis was used to evaluate survival predictors. A <em>p</em> values &lt; 0.05 was considered significant.</p></div><div><h3>Results</h3><p>Comparing the control and beta-blocker cohorts, there were no differences in baseline characteristics, post-TACE imaging timepoints, tumor response or transplant free survival (<em>p</em> &gt; 0.05). Tumor size was found to be a predictor of survival when the two cohorts were combined (<em>p</em> = 0.03).</p></div><div><h3>Conclusion</h3><p>Transplant-free survival and HCC response to first-line TACE treatment were similar in the control and beta-blocker groups. Large tumor sizes were associated with higher mortality in combined analysis of the cohorts.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":50680,"journal":{"name":"Clinical Imaging","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":1.8000,"publicationDate":"2024-09-10","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Clinical Imaging","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0899707124002134","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"RADIOLOGY, NUCLEAR MEDICINE & MEDICAL IMAGING","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Purpose

Favorable clinical outcomes have been reported with the adjunct use of beta-blockers in cancer treatment, hypothetically secondary to their anti-angiogenic/anti-proliferative effects. Hereby, we investigate whether there is synergy between beta-blockers and TACE in the treatment of HCC.

Methods

36 HCC patients on beta-blockers (mean dose of 48 mg daily) at the time of first-line treatment with TACE at our institution were retrospectively identified out of a cohort of 221 patients between 2008 and 2019. Using propensity scoring, a matched cohort of 36 patients not exposed to beta-blockers was generated based on age, gender, ethnicity, etiology of liver disease, BCLC, child Pugh score, PS/ECOG, cirrhosis, largest mass treated, type of TACE and treated liver segments. Tumor response was assessed at 1st and 2nd post-TACE imaging timepoints (1.4 and 4.1 months on average respectively). Variables were compared using chi-square test and Student's t-test. Kaplan-Meier transplant-free survival plots were generated using IBM® SPSS® software. Cox regression analysis was used to evaluate survival predictors. A p values < 0.05 was considered significant.

Results

Comparing the control and beta-blocker cohorts, there were no differences in baseline characteristics, post-TACE imaging timepoints, tumor response or transplant free survival (p > 0.05). Tumor size was found to be a predictor of survival when the two cohorts were combined (p = 0.03).

Conclusion

Transplant-free survival and HCC response to first-line TACE treatment were similar in the control and beta-blocker groups. Large tumor sizes were associated with higher mortality in combined analysis of the cohorts.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
研究β-受体阻滞剂与经动脉化疗栓塞治疗肝细胞癌的协同作用:倾向匹配分析的初步数据
目的据报道,在癌症治疗中辅助使用β-受体阻滞剂可获得良好的临床疗效,这可能是由于β-受体阻滞剂具有抗血管生成/抗增生作用。方法回顾性地从 2008 年至 2019 年期间的 221 例患者队列中找出了 36 例在我院接受 TACE 一线治疗时服用β-受体阻滞剂(平均每日剂量为 48 毫克)的 HCC 患者。利用倾向评分法,根据年龄、性别、种族、肝病病因、BCLC、儿童 Pugh 评分、PS/ECOG、肝硬化、治疗的最大肿块、TACE 类型和治疗的肝段,生成了 36 例未暴露于β-受体阻滞剂的患者的匹配队列。肿瘤反应在 TACE 术后第一和第二个成像时间点(平均分别为 1.4 个月和 4.1 个月)进行评估。变量比较采用卡方检验和学生 t 检验。使用 IBM® SPSS® 软件生成 Kaplan-Meier 无移植生存图。Cox 回归分析用于评估生存预测因素。结果对照组和β-受体阻滞剂组在基线特征、TACE后成像时间点、肿瘤反应或无移植生存率方面没有差异(p >0.05)。结论对照组和β-受体阻滞剂组的无移植生存率和HCC对一线TACE治疗的反应相似。结论对照组和β受体阻滞剂组的无移植生存率和HCC对一线TACE治疗的反应相似。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Clinical Imaging
Clinical Imaging 医学-核医学
CiteScore
4.60
自引率
0.00%
发文量
265
审稿时长
35 days
期刊介绍: The mission of Clinical Imaging is to publish, in a timely manner, the very best radiology research from the United States and around the world with special attention to the impact of medical imaging on patient care. The journal''s publications cover all imaging modalities, radiology issues related to patients, policy and practice improvements, and clinically-oriented imaging physics and informatics. The journal is a valuable resource for practicing radiologists, radiologists-in-training and other clinicians with an interest in imaging. Papers are carefully peer-reviewed and selected by our experienced subject editors who are leading experts spanning the range of imaging sub-specialties, which include: -Body Imaging- Breast Imaging- Cardiothoracic Imaging- Imaging Physics and Informatics- Molecular Imaging and Nuclear Medicine- Musculoskeletal and Emergency Imaging- Neuroradiology- Practice, Policy & Education- Pediatric Imaging- Vascular and Interventional Radiology
期刊最新文献
Women in Radiology Education (WIRED): An actionable step towards closing the gender gap in radiology. Contents Heart lung axis in acute pulmonary embolism: Role of CT in risk stratification Clinical experience on the limited role of ultrasound for breast cancer screening in BRCA1 and BRCA2 mutations carriers aged 30–39 years Factors affecting mammogram breast cancer surveillance effectiveness in the ipsilateral and contralateral breast
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1