Rate and risk factors for inpatient falls following single-level posterior lumbar fusion: A national registry study

{"title":"Rate and risk factors for inpatient falls following single-level posterior lumbar fusion: A national registry study","authors":"","doi":"10.1016/j.xnsj.2024.100549","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Background</h3><p>Posterior lumbar fusion (PLF) is frequently considered for various spinal pathologies. While many outcome metrics have been assessed, to our knowledge, there has yet to be literature specifically investigating inpatient falls (IPFs) and its risk factors.</p></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><p>Adult patients who underwent single-level PLF were abstracted from the 2010–Q1 2022 M161Ortho PearlDiver Database. Patients who had an IPF were determined based on administrative coding. Various patient variables were extracted and variables independently associated with IPFs were assessed with multivariate logistic regression. Incidence of secondary injuries and cost incurred related to the IPF were determined.</p></div><div><h3>Results</h3><p>Of the 342,890 patients who underwent PLF, IPF was identified for 4,379 (1.4%). Independent predictors of an IPF in decreasing odds ratio (OR) order were those with: active psychosis (OR=3.35), active delirium (OR=2.83), history of falling (OR=2.47), commercial insurance (OR=1.59 relative to Medicare), Medicaid insurance (OR=1.47 relative to Medicare), dementia (OR=1.17), older age (OR=1.12 per decade), alcohol use disorder (O=1.11), higher comorbidity (OR=1.08 per Elixhauser comorbidity index point) (p&lt;.05 for each).</p><p>Of patients with IPF, 44 (1.0%) sustained a head injury, and 42 (1.0%) sustained a fracture. On average, those with IPF incurred greater inpatient costs compared to patients who did not ($36,865 vs. $33,921, p&lt;.001).</p></div><div><h3>Conclusion</h3><p>In this national sample of patients who underwent single-level PLF, postoperative IPFs were identified for 1.4% and were associated with defined patient variables. These findings have potential patient outcome, financial, and medicolegal implications and should help guide refinement of fall prevention programs.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":34622,"journal":{"name":"North American Spine Society Journal","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-08-14","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2666548424002427/pdfft?md5=4dc80135d9daea6f6674fdf29a8dcccc&pid=1-s2.0-S2666548424002427-main.pdf","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"North American Spine Society Journal","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2666548424002427","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"Medicine","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background

Posterior lumbar fusion (PLF) is frequently considered for various spinal pathologies. While many outcome metrics have been assessed, to our knowledge, there has yet to be literature specifically investigating inpatient falls (IPFs) and its risk factors.

Methods

Adult patients who underwent single-level PLF were abstracted from the 2010–Q1 2022 M161Ortho PearlDiver Database. Patients who had an IPF were determined based on administrative coding. Various patient variables were extracted and variables independently associated with IPFs were assessed with multivariate logistic regression. Incidence of secondary injuries and cost incurred related to the IPF were determined.

Results

Of the 342,890 patients who underwent PLF, IPF was identified for 4,379 (1.4%). Independent predictors of an IPF in decreasing odds ratio (OR) order were those with: active psychosis (OR=3.35), active delirium (OR=2.83), history of falling (OR=2.47), commercial insurance (OR=1.59 relative to Medicare), Medicaid insurance (OR=1.47 relative to Medicare), dementia (OR=1.17), older age (OR=1.12 per decade), alcohol use disorder (O=1.11), higher comorbidity (OR=1.08 per Elixhauser comorbidity index point) (p<.05 for each).

Of patients with IPF, 44 (1.0%) sustained a head injury, and 42 (1.0%) sustained a fracture. On average, those with IPF incurred greater inpatient costs compared to patients who did not ($36,865 vs. $33,921, p<.001).

Conclusion

In this national sample of patients who underwent single-level PLF, postoperative IPFs were identified for 1.4% and were associated with defined patient variables. These findings have potential patient outcome, financial, and medicolegal implications and should help guide refinement of fall prevention programs.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
单层后路腰椎融合术后住院患者跌倒的发生率和风险因素:一项全国登记研究
背景腰椎后路融合术(PLF)经常被用于治疗各种脊柱疾病。方法从 2010-2022 年第一季度 M161Ortho PearlDiver 数据库中抽取接受单层腰椎融合术的成人患者。根据行政编码确定患者是否患有 IPF。提取了患者的各种变量,并通过多变量逻辑回归评估了与 IPF 独立相关的变量。结果 在 342,890 名接受 PLF 的患者中,4,379 人(1.4%)发现了 IPF。按几率比 (OR) 递减顺序排列,IPF 的独立预测因素包括:活动性精神病(OR=3.35)、活动性谵妄(OR=2.83)、跌倒史(OR=2.47)、商业保险(相对于医疗保险,OR=1.59)、医疗补助保险(相对于医疗保险,OR=1.在 IPF 患者中,44 人(1.0%)头部受伤,42 人(1.0%)骨折。平均而言,与未发生 IPF 的患者相比,发生 IPF 的患者的住院费用更高(36,865 美元对 33,921 美元,p< .001)。这些发现可能对患者的治疗效果、经济和医疗法律产生影响,并有助于指导完善跌倒预防计划。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
1.80
自引率
0.00%
发文量
71
审稿时长
48 days
期刊最新文献
Genetics and pathogenesis of scoliosis Incidence of temporary intraoperative iliac artery occlusion during anterior spinal surgery The hidden risk: Intracranial hemorrhage following durotomies in spine surgery Sequential correction of sagittal vertical alignment and lumbar lordosis in adult flatback deformity Spinal alignment and surgical correction in the aging spine and osteoporotic patient
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1