Comparative evaluation of conventional and modified Hughes procedures in reconstructing large full-thickness defects of the lower eyelid

IF 1.5 Q3 SURGERY JPRAS Open Pub Date : 2024-09-07 DOI:10.1016/j.jpra.2024.08.005
Lei Zhang , Ye Pan , Jiagen Li , Hong Zhao
{"title":"Comparative evaluation of conventional and modified Hughes procedures in reconstructing large full-thickness defects of the lower eyelid","authors":"Lei Zhang ,&nbsp;Ye Pan ,&nbsp;Jiagen Li ,&nbsp;Hong Zhao","doi":"10.1016/j.jpra.2024.08.005","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Purpose</h3><p>To introduce a modified Hughes procedure for the repair of large full-thickness defects of the lower eyelid.</p></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><p>This retrospective study included 56 patients: 30 in the conventional group treated with a Hughes flap and 26 in the modified group treated with a full-thickness upper eyelid flap pedicled with levator aponeurosis, Muller muscle and conjunctiva. The reconstruction time, period of pedicle division and complication rates were evaluated.</p></div><div><h3>Results</h3><p>The lower eyelid reconstruction time was 89.2±7.7 minutes in the conventional group and 61.7±7.5 minutes in the modified group, whereas the period of pedicle division was 21.1±3.0 days in the conventional group and 10.8±3.0 days in the modified group, and the differences were statistically significant (p = 0.000 and 0.000). Lower eyelid retraction was 0.4±0.4 mm in the conventional group and 0.1±0.2 mm in the modified group, and the difference was statistically significant (p = 0.001).</p></div><div><h3>Conclusion</h3><p>The modified Hughes procedure in this study resulted in a shorter lower eyelid reconstruction time, a shorter period of pedicle division, and a lower degree of lower eyelid retraction. This technique is simple and convenient for reconstructing large full-thickness defects of the lower eyelid.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":37996,"journal":{"name":"JPRAS Open","volume":"42 ","pages":"Pages 152-161"},"PeriodicalIF":1.5000,"publicationDate":"2024-09-07","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2352587824001256/pdfft?md5=4c9c2498700801d669a831197eb2114e&pid=1-s2.0-S2352587824001256-main.pdf","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"JPRAS Open","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2352587824001256","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"SURGERY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Purpose

To introduce a modified Hughes procedure for the repair of large full-thickness defects of the lower eyelid.

Methods

This retrospective study included 56 patients: 30 in the conventional group treated with a Hughes flap and 26 in the modified group treated with a full-thickness upper eyelid flap pedicled with levator aponeurosis, Muller muscle and conjunctiva. The reconstruction time, period of pedicle division and complication rates were evaluated.

Results

The lower eyelid reconstruction time was 89.2±7.7 minutes in the conventional group and 61.7±7.5 minutes in the modified group, whereas the period of pedicle division was 21.1±3.0 days in the conventional group and 10.8±3.0 days in the modified group, and the differences were statistically significant (p = 0.000 and 0.000). Lower eyelid retraction was 0.4±0.4 mm in the conventional group and 0.1±0.2 mm in the modified group, and the difference was statistically significant (p = 0.001).

Conclusion

The modified Hughes procedure in this study resulted in a shorter lower eyelid reconstruction time, a shorter period of pedicle division, and a lower degree of lower eyelid retraction. This technique is simple and convenient for reconstructing large full-thickness defects of the lower eyelid.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
传统和改良休斯手术在重建下眼睑大面积全厚缺损中的比较评估
目的介绍一种修复下眼睑大面积全厚缺损的改良休斯手术方法:方法这项回顾性研究纳入了56名患者:传统组30名,采用休斯皮瓣治疗;改良组26名,采用全厚上眼睑皮瓣,再加上提上睑肌腱膜、Muller肌和结膜。结果 常规组下眼睑重建时间为(89.2±7.7)分钟,改良组为(61.7±7.5)分钟;常规组睫毛根部分离时间为(21.1±3.0)天,改良组为(10.8±3.0)天,差异有统计学意义(P=0.000和0.000)。传统组下眼睑回缩为 0.4±0.4 mm,改良组为 0.1±0.2 mm,差异有统计学意义(P = 0.001)。这种技术对于重建下眼睑大面积全厚缺损简单方便。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
JPRAS Open
JPRAS Open Medicine-Surgery
CiteScore
1.60
自引率
0.00%
发文量
89
审稿时长
22 weeks
期刊介绍: JPRAS Open is an international, open access journal dedicated to publishing case reports, short communications, and full-length articles. JPRAS Open will provide the most current source of information and references in plastic, reconstructive & aesthetic surgery. The Journal is based on the continued need to improve surgical care by providing highlights in general reconstructive surgery; cleft lip, palate and craniofacial surgery; head and neck surgery; skin cancer; breast surgery; hand surgery; lower limb trauma; burns; and aesthetic surgery. The Journal will provide authors with fast publication times.
期刊最新文献
Anatomy and biomechanics of the scapholunate ligament in Vietnamese cadavers Rare presentation and resection of giant cell tumor invading the middle ear and skull base: A case report Orthoplastic surgery research: Three decades of growth and future directions Prevalence of Silicone Lymphadenopathy in Women with Breast Implants: A single-center retrospective study Microsurgery influences breast reconstruction and its timing in patients with breast cancer: A population-based multilevel analysis
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1