Differences between adolescents' and their parents' perceived benefits and barriers to actively commute to school: The PACO y PACA project

IF 3.2 3区 工程技术 Q2 PUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH Journal of Transport & Health Pub Date : 2024-09-13 DOI:10.1016/j.jth.2024.101889
Iván Pinilla-Quintana, Evelyn Martin-Moraleda, Cristina Romero-Blanco, Antonio Hernández-Martínez, Karel Švátora, Maria Teresa Martínez-Romero, Maria Paula Santos, Manuel Herrador-Colmenero, Nuria Castro-Lemus, Carmen Mota, Alberto Dorado-Suárez, Virginia García-Coll, Esther Cabanillas-Cruz, Ana Queralt, Fabio Jiménez-Zazo, Susana Aznar
{"title":"Differences between adolescents' and their parents' perceived benefits and barriers to actively commute to school: The PACO y PACA project","authors":"Iván Pinilla-Quintana,&nbsp;Evelyn Martin-Moraleda,&nbsp;Cristina Romero-Blanco,&nbsp;Antonio Hernández-Martínez,&nbsp;Karel Švátora,&nbsp;Maria Teresa Martínez-Romero,&nbsp;Maria Paula Santos,&nbsp;Manuel Herrador-Colmenero,&nbsp;Nuria Castro-Lemus,&nbsp;Carmen Mota,&nbsp;Alberto Dorado-Suárez,&nbsp;Virginia García-Coll,&nbsp;Esther Cabanillas-Cruz,&nbsp;Ana Queralt,&nbsp;Fabio Jiménez-Zazo,&nbsp;Susana Aznar","doi":"10.1016/j.jth.2024.101889","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Introduction</h3><p>Adolescents' and Parents' perceptions of active commuting to school ACS have been studied mainly separately. This study aims to: (1) examine and compare the benefits and barriers of walking to school perceived by adolescents and their parents within the whole sample, (2) and based on adolescents' modes of commuting to school (walking and using motorized transport).</p></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><p>Third grade adolescents at secondary education from 4 Spanish cities and their parents participated in the PACOyPACA cross-sectional study. All completed a benefits and barriers questionnaires regarding to adolescents walking to school. Descriptive statistics, paired samples <em>t</em>-test and Wilcoxon test were used to identify differences between adolescents' and their parents' perceived benefits and barriers.</p></div><div><h3>Results</h3><p>466 adolescents (age: 14.86 ± 0.51 years old) and 499 parents (age: 48.00 ± 5.42 years old) entered the study. Results showed that 209 (44.8%) adolescents walked to school, and girls did it significantly less (p &lt; 0.01). Benefits were perceived as significantly more important for parents than for adolescents (p &lt; 0.001) in all cases and regardless of the modes of commuting. As for barriers, adolescents cared significantly more about saving time (p &lt; 0.001), and parents significantly gave more importance to traffic danger and additional planning to walk to school (p &lt; 0.001). When adolescents walked to school, they were significantly more concerned than parents about saving time (p &lt; 0.01), weather and walking being a hassle (p &lt; 0.05), and parents reported traffic as a significantly higher concern than adolescents (p &lt; 0.05). When adolescents commuted to school by motorized transport, they significantly gave more importance than parents to saving time (p = 0.001), and parents reported significantly higher values for additional planning to walk to school (p &lt; 0.001), lack of continuous paths (p &lt; 0.01), distance, weather, and traffic (p &lt; 0.05) than adolescents.</p></div><div><h3>Conclusions</h3><p>Perceived benefits were important for adolescents and parents, regardless of the modes of commuting to school. Adolescents and their parents presented higher concerns when adolescents commuted to school by motorized transport.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":47838,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Transport & Health","volume":"39 ","pages":"Article 101889"},"PeriodicalIF":3.2000,"publicationDate":"2024-09-13","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Transport & Health","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S221414052400135X","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"工程技术","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"PUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Introduction

Adolescents' and Parents' perceptions of active commuting to school ACS have been studied mainly separately. This study aims to: (1) examine and compare the benefits and barriers of walking to school perceived by adolescents and their parents within the whole sample, (2) and based on adolescents' modes of commuting to school (walking and using motorized transport).

Methods

Third grade adolescents at secondary education from 4 Spanish cities and their parents participated in the PACOyPACA cross-sectional study. All completed a benefits and barriers questionnaires regarding to adolescents walking to school. Descriptive statistics, paired samples t-test and Wilcoxon test were used to identify differences between adolescents' and their parents' perceived benefits and barriers.

Results

466 adolescents (age: 14.86 ± 0.51 years old) and 499 parents (age: 48.00 ± 5.42 years old) entered the study. Results showed that 209 (44.8%) adolescents walked to school, and girls did it significantly less (p < 0.01). Benefits were perceived as significantly more important for parents than for adolescents (p < 0.001) in all cases and regardless of the modes of commuting. As for barriers, adolescents cared significantly more about saving time (p < 0.001), and parents significantly gave more importance to traffic danger and additional planning to walk to school (p < 0.001). When adolescents walked to school, they were significantly more concerned than parents about saving time (p < 0.01), weather and walking being a hassle (p < 0.05), and parents reported traffic as a significantly higher concern than adolescents (p < 0.05). When adolescents commuted to school by motorized transport, they significantly gave more importance than parents to saving time (p = 0.001), and parents reported significantly higher values for additional planning to walk to school (p < 0.001), lack of continuous paths (p < 0.01), distance, weather, and traffic (p < 0.05) than adolescents.

Conclusions

Perceived benefits were important for adolescents and parents, regardless of the modes of commuting to school. Adolescents and their parents presented higher concerns when adolescents commuted to school by motorized transport.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
青少年及其父母对积极通勤上学的好处和障碍的认识差异:PACO y PACA 项目
导言:青少年和家长对主动上下学 ACS 的看法主要是分开研究的。本研究旨在:(1) 研究和比较整个样本中青少年及其家长对步行上学的益处和障碍的看法,(2) 并根据青少年的上下学方式(步行和使用机动车辆)进行比较。方法来自西班牙 4 个城市的中学三年级学生及其家长参加了 PACOyPACA 横向研究。所有人都填写了一份关于青少年步行上学的益处和障碍的问卷。研究采用了描述性统计、配对样本 t 检验和 Wilcoxon 检验,以确定青少年及其父母所感知的益处和障碍之间的差异。结果显示,209 名青少年(44.8%)步行上学,其中女生步行上学的比例明显较低(p < 0.01)。在所有情况下,无论采用哪种通勤方式,家长都认为步行的好处明显比青少年更重要(p < 0.001)。至于障碍,青少年明显更关心节省时间(p < 0.001),而家长则明显更重视交通危险和步行上学的额外规划(p < 0.001)。当青少年步行上学时,他们对节省时间(p <0.01)、天气和步行麻烦(p <0.05)的关注度明显高于家长,家长对交通的关注度明显高于青少年(p <0.05)。当青少年乘坐机动车上下学时,他们对节省时间的重视程度明显高于家长(p = 0.001),而家长对步行上学的额外计划(p < 0.001)、缺乏连续道路(p < 0.01)、距离、天气和交通(p < 0.05)的重视程度明显高于青少年。当青少年乘坐机动车上下学时,他们及其父母会有更多的担忧。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
6.10
自引率
11.10%
发文量
196
审稿时长
69 days
期刊最新文献
Association between the risk of aberrant driving behavior and sleep disorder indices: A pilot study involving urban taxi drivers Driver vehicle crashes and mental health challenges among commuter college students The biosocial health of U.S. long haul truckers: Syndemics of the road Examining healthcare access with physical vs. telehealth options: Promise and peril for socially vulnerable older adults Physical activity and muscle activity of riding electric scooters
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1