Study of Cerchar abrasive parameters of monomineralic rocks and its application for evaluating cutting efficiency

IF 7 1区 工程技术 Q1 ENGINEERING, GEOLOGICAL International Journal of Rock Mechanics and Mining Sciences Pub Date : 2024-09-14 DOI:10.1016/j.ijrmms.2024.105895
Xin-Fang Li , Xiao-Ping Zhang , Shao-Hui Tang , Wei-Qiang Xie , Xin-Mei Yang , Quan-Sheng Liu
{"title":"Study of Cerchar abrasive parameters of monomineralic rocks and its application for evaluating cutting efficiency","authors":"Xin-Fang Li ,&nbsp;Xiao-Ping Zhang ,&nbsp;Shao-Hui Tang ,&nbsp;Wei-Qiang Xie ,&nbsp;Xin-Mei Yang ,&nbsp;Quan-Sheng Liu","doi":"10.1016/j.ijrmms.2024.105895","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>The Cerchar test is the most commonly used method for evaluating rock abrasivity and estimating tool wear. The conventional test results are reported based on the measured changes of the wear parts, and little attention is paid to what happens on the rock surface and scratching force. Since the cutting process is the interactive behavior between cutting tools and rock materials, the changes in both parts are important to represent rock-tool interaction and evaluate cutting efficiency. In the present study, the Cerchar tests have been carried out on eleven types of monomineralic rocks by using an improved West apparatus. The related abrasive parameters have been comprehensively and systematically analyzed, including stylus tip wear, rock material loss, applied horizontal force, and scratching energy. The variation characteristics of those abrasive parameters have been studied. The specific abrasivity ratio (<em>SAR</em>) and scratching specific energy (<em>SSE</em>), which represent the tool wear and energy consumption per unit of rock removal respectively, have been developed to evaluate the cutting efficiency of different rocks. The results show that the <em>SAR</em> and <em>SSE</em> values of the tested rocks have comparable data ranges and variation trends due to the same mathematical treatment of the indices. Under the given rock removal volume, the <em>SAR</em> and <em>SSE</em> could be used to compare and classify the relative cutting efficiency of different rocks. The lower the <em>SAR</em> and <em>SSE</em> values, the less stylus wear and lower energy consumption in the cutting process, indicating higher cutting efficiency. According to their values, the cutting efficiency of the tested rocks is divided into four categories: high cutting efficiency, medium cutting efficiency, low cutting efficiency, and very low cutting efficiency. The <em>SAR</em>-based and <em>SSE</em>-based classifications are consistent for most of the tested rocks, and the <em>SAR</em>-based classification is lower to higher abrasive rocks (pyroxene, hematite, and quartz) due to it considering the influence of stylus tip wear. Hence the <em>SAR</em>-based classification is more suitable for hard and highly abrasive rocks.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":54941,"journal":{"name":"International Journal of Rock Mechanics and Mining Sciences","volume":"183 ","pages":"Article 105895"},"PeriodicalIF":7.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-09-14","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"International Journal of Rock Mechanics and Mining Sciences","FirstCategoryId":"5","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1365160924002600","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"工程技术","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ENGINEERING, GEOLOGICAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

The Cerchar test is the most commonly used method for evaluating rock abrasivity and estimating tool wear. The conventional test results are reported based on the measured changes of the wear parts, and little attention is paid to what happens on the rock surface and scratching force. Since the cutting process is the interactive behavior between cutting tools and rock materials, the changes in both parts are important to represent rock-tool interaction and evaluate cutting efficiency. In the present study, the Cerchar tests have been carried out on eleven types of monomineralic rocks by using an improved West apparatus. The related abrasive parameters have been comprehensively and systematically analyzed, including stylus tip wear, rock material loss, applied horizontal force, and scratching energy. The variation characteristics of those abrasive parameters have been studied. The specific abrasivity ratio (SAR) and scratching specific energy (SSE), which represent the tool wear and energy consumption per unit of rock removal respectively, have been developed to evaluate the cutting efficiency of different rocks. The results show that the SAR and SSE values of the tested rocks have comparable data ranges and variation trends due to the same mathematical treatment of the indices. Under the given rock removal volume, the SAR and SSE could be used to compare and classify the relative cutting efficiency of different rocks. The lower the SAR and SSE values, the less stylus wear and lower energy consumption in the cutting process, indicating higher cutting efficiency. According to their values, the cutting efficiency of the tested rocks is divided into four categories: high cutting efficiency, medium cutting efficiency, low cutting efficiency, and very low cutting efficiency. The SAR-based and SSE-based classifications are consistent for most of the tested rocks, and the SAR-based classification is lower to higher abrasive rocks (pyroxene, hematite, and quartz) due to it considering the influence of stylus tip wear. Hence the SAR-based classification is more suitable for hard and highly abrasive rocks.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
单矿物岩石的 Cerchar 磨料参数研究及其在切削效率评估中的应用
Cerchar 试验是评估岩石磨损性和估计工具磨损的最常用方法。传统的测试结果是根据测量到的磨损部分的变化来报告的,很少关注岩石表面和刮擦力的变化。由于切削过程是切削工具与岩石材料之间的交互行为,因此这两部分的变化对于表示岩石与工具之间的交互作用和评估切削效率非常重要。在本研究中,使用改进的 West 仪器对 11 种单质岩石进行了 Cerchar 试验。对相关的磨料参数进行了全面系统的分析,包括测尖磨损、岩石材料损耗、施加的水平力和划痕能量。研究了这些磨料参数的变化特征。开发了比磨蚀率(SAR)和划痕比能量(SSE),分别表示单位岩石去除量的工具磨损和能量消耗,用于评估不同岩石的切割效率。结果表明,由于对指标进行了相同的数学处理,被测岩石的 SAR 值和 SSE 值具有可比的数据范围和变化趋势。在给定的岩石去除量下,SAR 和 SSE 可用来比较和划分不同岩石的相对切割效率。SAR 和 SSE 值越低,切割过程中的测针磨损越小,能耗越低,说明切割效率越高。根据它们的数值,测试岩石的切割效率被分为四类:高切割效率、中等切割效率、低切割效率和极低切割效率。基于 SAR 的分类和基于 SSE 的分类对大多数测试岩石都是一致的,而基于 SAR 的分类由于考虑了测尖磨损的影响,对高磨蚀性岩石(辉石、赤铁矿和石英)的分类较低。因此,基于 SAR 的分类方法更适用于坚硬和高磨蚀性岩石。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
14.00
自引率
5.60%
发文量
196
审稿时长
18 weeks
期刊介绍: The International Journal of Rock Mechanics and Mining Sciences focuses on original research, new developments, site measurements, and case studies within the fields of rock mechanics and rock engineering. Serving as an international platform, it showcases high-quality papers addressing rock mechanics and the application of its principles and techniques in mining and civil engineering projects situated on or within rock masses. These projects encompass a wide range, including slopes, open-pit mines, quarries, shafts, tunnels, caverns, underground mines, metro systems, dams, hydro-electric stations, geothermal energy, petroleum engineering, and radioactive waste disposal. The journal welcomes submissions on various topics, with particular interest in theoretical advancements, analytical and numerical methods, rock testing, site investigation, and case studies.
期刊最新文献
Charge signals characterizing the influence of bedding angles on shale damage under cyclic loading and unloading A shear strength criterion of rock joints under dynamic normal load Fully coupled hydro-mechanical–chemical continuum modeling of fluid percolation through rock salt A micro-macro fracture model for evaluating the brittle-ductile transition and rockburst of rock in true triaxial compression Evaluation of Forchheimer equation coefficients for nonlinear flow through rough-walled fractures during shearing
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1