Test results pending at discharge among emergency department patients experiencing homelessness

IF 2.7 3区 医学 Q1 EMERGENCY MEDICINE American Journal of Emergency Medicine Pub Date : 2024-09-14 DOI:10.1016/j.ajem.2024.09.028
{"title":"Test results pending at discharge among emergency department patients experiencing homelessness","authors":"","doi":"10.1016/j.ajem.2024.09.028","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Background</h3><p>Persons experiencing homelessness (PEH) are vulnerable emergency department (ED) patients due to high rates of multi-comorbidity and mortality, as well as a lack of follow up care. Communication of test results pending at discharge (TPAD) is an important area of post-ED follow up care. We examined phone access, successful contact, and change in treatment among PEH and non-PEH with TPAD from the ED.</p></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><p>We performed a retrospective cohort study and included all abnormal TPAD and patient telephone notes regarding TPAD over 7 months extracted from the electronic health record of a single, high-volume, urban, safety-net hospital in Denver, Colorado. Two investigators reviewed all data to determine phone access, successful contact, and recommended treatment change. Descriptive statistics were calculated for all variables and compared between PEH and non-PEH. We assessed associations between homelessness and successful contact and phone access while adjusting for age and sex using multivariable logistic regression.</p></div><div><h3>Results</h3><p>A total of 940 patient encounters with TPAD were included. 142 telephone notes regarding abnormal TPAD were included, of which 33 (23 %) were to PEH. Compared to PEH, housed patients were significantly more likely to have access to a phone (+31 %, 95 % CI: 14–48 %), have an active phone (+46 %, 95 % CI: 29–64 %), and be successfully contacted (+42 %, 95 % CI: 24–60 %), but were less likely to have a recommended change in treatment (−14 %, 95 % CI: −24 to −5 %). Homelessness was significantly associated with decreased successful contact (odds ratio [OR] 0.16, 95 % CI: 0.07–0.38) and decreased phone access (OR 0.11, 95 % CI: 0.04–0.33) after adjusting for age and sex. In the subgroup of patients with phone access (<em>n</em> = 124), homelessness was significantly associated with decreased successful contact (OR 0.26, 95 % CI: 0.10–0.70) after adjusting for age and sex.</p></div><div><h3>Conclusion</h3><p>PEH are less likely to have phone access and be successfully contacted regarding TPAD, resulting in untreated or improperly treated infectious disease. Thus, EDs and hospital systems should explore innovative communication solutions, such as shared responsibility models and partnerships with shelters and healthcare for the homeless clinics to improve successful contact with PEH regarding TPAD.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":55536,"journal":{"name":"American Journal of Emergency Medicine","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":2.7000,"publicationDate":"2024-09-14","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"American Journal of Emergency Medicine","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0735675724004698","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"EMERGENCY MEDICINE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background

Persons experiencing homelessness (PEH) are vulnerable emergency department (ED) patients due to high rates of multi-comorbidity and mortality, as well as a lack of follow up care. Communication of test results pending at discharge (TPAD) is an important area of post-ED follow up care. We examined phone access, successful contact, and change in treatment among PEH and non-PEH with TPAD from the ED.

Methods

We performed a retrospective cohort study and included all abnormal TPAD and patient telephone notes regarding TPAD over 7 months extracted from the electronic health record of a single, high-volume, urban, safety-net hospital in Denver, Colorado. Two investigators reviewed all data to determine phone access, successful contact, and recommended treatment change. Descriptive statistics were calculated for all variables and compared between PEH and non-PEH. We assessed associations between homelessness and successful contact and phone access while adjusting for age and sex using multivariable logistic regression.

Results

A total of 940 patient encounters with TPAD were included. 142 telephone notes regarding abnormal TPAD were included, of which 33 (23 %) were to PEH. Compared to PEH, housed patients were significantly more likely to have access to a phone (+31 %, 95 % CI: 14–48 %), have an active phone (+46 %, 95 % CI: 29–64 %), and be successfully contacted (+42 %, 95 % CI: 24–60 %), but were less likely to have a recommended change in treatment (−14 %, 95 % CI: −24 to −5 %). Homelessness was significantly associated with decreased successful contact (odds ratio [OR] 0.16, 95 % CI: 0.07–0.38) and decreased phone access (OR 0.11, 95 % CI: 0.04–0.33) after adjusting for age and sex. In the subgroup of patients with phone access (n = 124), homelessness was significantly associated with decreased successful contact (OR 0.26, 95 % CI: 0.10–0.70) after adjusting for age and sex.

Conclusion

PEH are less likely to have phone access and be successfully contacted regarding TPAD, resulting in untreated or improperly treated infectious disease. Thus, EDs and hospital systems should explore innovative communication solutions, such as shared responsibility models and partnerships with shelters and healthcare for the homeless clinics to improve successful contact with PEH regarding TPAD.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
无家可归的急诊科患者出院时尚未得到检测结果
背景无家可归者(PEH)是急诊科(ED)的易感性患者,因为他们的多病症发病率和死亡率都很高,而且缺乏后续护理。出院时检验结果的沟通(TPAD)是急诊室后续护理的一个重要方面。方法我们进行了一项回顾性队列研究,从科罗拉多州丹佛市一家单一、大容量、城市、安全网医院的电子健康记录中提取了 7 个月内所有异常 TPAD 和有关 TPAD 的患者电话记录。两名调查人员审查了所有数据,以确定电话接入、成功联系和建议的治疗改变。我们计算了所有变量的描述性统计,并对 PEH 和非 PEH 进行了比较。我们评估了无家可归与成功联系和电话接入之间的关联,同时使用多变量逻辑回归对年龄和性别进行了调整。共纳入了 142 份有关 TPAD 异常的电话记录,其中 33 份(23%)是打给 PEH 的。与 PEH 相比,有住房的患者更有可能使用电话(+31 %,95 % CI:14-48 %)、拥有活动电话(+46 %,95 % CI:29-64 %)和成功取得联系(+42 %,95 % CI:24-60 %),但建议改变治疗方法的可能性较低(-14 %,95 % CI:-24 至 -5 %)。在对年龄和性别进行调整后,无家可归与成功联系率降低(几率比 [OR] 0.16,95 % CI:0.07-0.38)和电话使用率降低(OR 0.11,95 % CI:0.04-0.33)有明显关联。在可使用电话的亚组患者(n = 124)中,在调整年龄和性别后,无家可归与成功联系率降低(OR 0.26,95 % CI:0.10-0.70)显著相关。因此,急诊室和医院系统应探索创新的沟通解决方案,如责任分担模式以及与庇护所和无家可归者医疗诊所合作,以改善与 PEH 就 TPAD 成功取得联系的情况。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
6.00
自引率
5.60%
发文量
730
审稿时长
42 days
期刊介绍: A distinctive blend of practicality and scholarliness makes the American Journal of Emergency Medicine a key source for information on emergency medical care. Covering all activities concerned with emergency medicine, it is the journal to turn to for information to help increase the ability to understand, recognize and treat emergency conditions. Issues contain clinical articles, case reports, review articles, editorials, international notes, book reviews and more.
期刊最新文献
Gabapentinoid prescribing patterns and predictors utilizing neural networks:Comment. Why is oral diltiazem protocol more effective than intravenous protocol for acute rate control in the emergency department? Epidemiology of heart failure presentations to United States emergency departments from 2016 to 2023. Characterizing emergency department surgical airway placement in the setting of trauma - A reply with a data-in-brief analysis of the pediatric cricothyrotomy. An update of the severe trauma scoring system using the Korean National Emergency Department Information System (NEDIS) database.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1