Umbrella index as a conservation tool across pondscapes: A case study using frogs, aquatic insects, and plants in South Africa

IF 5.4 Q1 ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCES Environmental and Sustainability Indicators Pub Date : 2024-09-12 DOI:10.1016/j.indic.2024.100478
Rebecca A. Cawood, Michael J. Samways, James S. Pryke
{"title":"Umbrella index as a conservation tool across pondscapes: A case study using frogs, aquatic insects, and plants in South Africa","authors":"Rebecca A. Cawood,&nbsp;Michael J. Samways,&nbsp;James S. Pryke","doi":"10.1016/j.indic.2024.100478","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>Biological surrogates are valuable for conservation when they are easy and cost-effective to sample, sensitive to anthropogenic change, and show similar assemblage patterns to other taxa. The umbrella index (UI) developed by Fleishman et al. (2000), aims to conserve most species in an ecosystem by focusing on a single or small group of co-occurring species to represent all species present. Here we focus on various lentic aquatic insects (‘aquatic insects’ henceforth refers to aquatic beetles, aquatic bugs, and dragonfly larvae), adult dragonflies, frogs, and aquatic plants as potential surrogates for pond communities in the Midlands, KwaZulu-Natal Province, South Africa. There were some cross-taxon correlations, but these were too weak to consider for surrogacy, largely due to dissimilar responses to the same environmental gradients. However, using UI we identified five dragonfly species, nine aquatic insect species, and three frog species as potential umbrella groups for their own taxa. The UI for same-group surrogates was flexible and covered most taxa, ranging from co-occurring habitat generalists to rare specialist species. Furthermore, all four endemic species sampled here were effective surrogate species for other local taxa, with two of them ranking top in their own taxonomic group. The lack of congruence among the different taxa means that one taxon cannot be used to stand in for another. However, the UI allowed efficient site prioritization, so long as a multi-taxon approach is used. We recommend the UI approach when selecting surrogates to represent aquatic fauna within a pondscape of the Midlands of South Africa.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":36171,"journal":{"name":"Environmental and Sustainability Indicators","volume":"24 ","pages":"Article 100478"},"PeriodicalIF":5.4000,"publicationDate":"2024-09-12","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2665972724001466/pdfft?md5=6b4152ef34658d6c0ea7ac2f32cea486&pid=1-s2.0-S2665972724001466-main.pdf","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Environmental and Sustainability Indicators","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2665972724001466","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Biological surrogates are valuable for conservation when they are easy and cost-effective to sample, sensitive to anthropogenic change, and show similar assemblage patterns to other taxa. The umbrella index (UI) developed by Fleishman et al. (2000), aims to conserve most species in an ecosystem by focusing on a single or small group of co-occurring species to represent all species present. Here we focus on various lentic aquatic insects (‘aquatic insects’ henceforth refers to aquatic beetles, aquatic bugs, and dragonfly larvae), adult dragonflies, frogs, and aquatic plants as potential surrogates for pond communities in the Midlands, KwaZulu-Natal Province, South Africa. There were some cross-taxon correlations, but these were too weak to consider for surrogacy, largely due to dissimilar responses to the same environmental gradients. However, using UI we identified five dragonfly species, nine aquatic insect species, and three frog species as potential umbrella groups for their own taxa. The UI for same-group surrogates was flexible and covered most taxa, ranging from co-occurring habitat generalists to rare specialist species. Furthermore, all four endemic species sampled here were effective surrogate species for other local taxa, with two of them ranking top in their own taxonomic group. The lack of congruence among the different taxa means that one taxon cannot be used to stand in for another. However, the UI allowed efficient site prioritization, so long as a multi-taxon approach is used. We recommend the UI approach when selecting surrogates to represent aquatic fauna within a pondscape of the Midlands of South Africa.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
作为池塘景观保护工具的伞状指数:利用南非的青蛙、水生昆虫和植物进行案例研究
当生物代用体易于取样且成本效益高、对人为变化敏感并显示出与其他类群相似的集合模式时,它们就具有保护价值。由 Fleishman 等人(2000 年)开发的伞状指数(UI)旨在通过关注单一或小群共存物种来代表生态系统中的所有物种,从而保护生态系统中的大多数物种。在此,我们重点研究了南非夸祖鲁-纳塔尔省中部地区的各种透镜水生昆虫(以下 "水生昆虫 "指水生甲虫、水生昆虫和蜻蜓幼虫)、蜻蜓成虫、青蛙和水生植物,作为池塘群落的潜在替代物种。虽然存在一些跨类群的相关性,但这些相关性太弱,不足以作为代用指标,这主要是由于对相同环境梯度的反应不同造成的。不过,利用 UI,我们确定了 5 个蜻蜓物种、9 个水生昆虫物种和 3 个青蛙物种作为其各自类群的潜在伞群。同类代用类群的 UI 非常灵活,涵盖了大多数类群,从共生的生境通类到稀有的专科物种。此外,这里采样的所有四个特有物种都是当地其他类群的有效代用物种,其中两个在各自的分类群中名列前茅。不同分类群之间缺乏一致性,这意味着一个分类群不能代替另一个分类群。不过,只要采用多分类群方法,用户界面就能有效地确定遗址的优先次序。我们建议在南非中部地区池塘景观中选择代表水生动物的代用类群时使用 UI 方法。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Environmental and Sustainability Indicators
Environmental and Sustainability Indicators Environmental Science-Environmental Science (miscellaneous)
CiteScore
7.80
自引率
2.30%
发文量
49
审稿时长
57 days
期刊最新文献
Conservation agriculture measures as a strategy to create sustainable social and psychological changes in agricultural communities Evaluating the implementation of the sustainable sites initiative (SITES) and its adaptation potential in China Navigating the financial sector's role in energy transition: A comprehensive assessment through the lens of the energy trilemma Assessment of groundwater quality for agricultural purposes in Qazvin Province, northwestern Iran: A fuzzy inference and indicator Kriging approach Monocropping vs mixed cropping systems under a changing climate: Smallholder farmers' perceptions and farm profitability in Eastern Rwanda
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1