Sophia Gross, Jana Ihlow, Leonie Busack, Kacper Adamiak, Jens Schrezenmeier, Julia Jesse, Michaela Schwarz, Anne Flörcken, Lam Giang Vuong, Kathrin Rieger, Jan Krönke, Philipp le Coutre, Vivien Boldt, Ann-Christin von Brünneck, David Horst, Thomas Burmeister, Igor-Wolfgang Blau, Ulrich Keller, Lars Bullinger, Jörg Westermann
{"title":"Therapy-related AML: long-term outcome in a large cohort of AML-patients with intensive and non-intensive therapy","authors":"Sophia Gross, Jana Ihlow, Leonie Busack, Kacper Adamiak, Jens Schrezenmeier, Julia Jesse, Michaela Schwarz, Anne Flörcken, Lam Giang Vuong, Kathrin Rieger, Jan Krönke, Philipp le Coutre, Vivien Boldt, Ann-Christin von Brünneck, David Horst, Thomas Burmeister, Igor-Wolfgang Blau, Ulrich Keller, Lars Bullinger, Jörg Westermann","doi":"10.1038/s41408-024-01140-5","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p>Therapy-related acute myeloid leukemia (t-AML) often exhibits adverse (genetic) features. There is ongoing discussion on the impact of t-AML on long-term outcome in AML. Therefore, we retrospectively analyzed clinical and biological characteristics of 1133 AML patients (225 t-AML patients and 908 de novo AML patients) with a median follow-up of 81.8 months. T-AML patients showed more adverse genetic alterations, higher age and more comorbidities as compared to de novo AML. Median OS in intensively treated t-AML patients was 13.7 months as compared to 39.4 months in de novo AML (<i>p</i> < 0.001). With non-intensive therapy, OS did not differ significantly (<i>p</i> = 0.394). With intensive therapy, significant differences in favor of de novo AML were observed in the ELN intermediate I/II (<i>p</i> = 0.009) and adverse (<i>p</i> = 0.016) risk groups but not within favorable risk groups (APL <i>p</i> = 0.927, ELN favorable <i>p</i> = 0.714). However, t-AML was no independent risk factor for OS (<i>p</i> = 0.103), RR (<i>p</i> = 0.982) and NRM (<i>p</i> = 0.320) in the multivariate analysis. A limitation of our study is an ELN 2010 risk stratification due to a lack of more comprehensive molecular data according to ELN 2022. We conclude that therapeutic algorithms in t-AML, in particular with regard to allo-HSCT, should be guided by ELN genetic risk rather than classification as t-AML alone. Our data support the WHO and ICC 2022 classifications, which include t-AML as diagnostic qualifier rather than a separate subcategory.</p>","PeriodicalId":8989,"journal":{"name":"Blood Cancer Journal","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":12.9000,"publicationDate":"2024-09-16","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Blood Cancer Journal","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1038/s41408-024-01140-5","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"HEMATOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Therapy-related acute myeloid leukemia (t-AML) often exhibits adverse (genetic) features. There is ongoing discussion on the impact of t-AML on long-term outcome in AML. Therefore, we retrospectively analyzed clinical and biological characteristics of 1133 AML patients (225 t-AML patients and 908 de novo AML patients) with a median follow-up of 81.8 months. T-AML patients showed more adverse genetic alterations, higher age and more comorbidities as compared to de novo AML. Median OS in intensively treated t-AML patients was 13.7 months as compared to 39.4 months in de novo AML (p < 0.001). With non-intensive therapy, OS did not differ significantly (p = 0.394). With intensive therapy, significant differences in favor of de novo AML were observed in the ELN intermediate I/II (p = 0.009) and adverse (p = 0.016) risk groups but not within favorable risk groups (APL p = 0.927, ELN favorable p = 0.714). However, t-AML was no independent risk factor for OS (p = 0.103), RR (p = 0.982) and NRM (p = 0.320) in the multivariate analysis. A limitation of our study is an ELN 2010 risk stratification due to a lack of more comprehensive molecular data according to ELN 2022. We conclude that therapeutic algorithms in t-AML, in particular with regard to allo-HSCT, should be guided by ELN genetic risk rather than classification as t-AML alone. Our data support the WHO and ICC 2022 classifications, which include t-AML as diagnostic qualifier rather than a separate subcategory.
期刊介绍:
Blood Cancer Journal is dedicated to publishing high-quality articles related to hematologic malignancies and related disorders. The journal welcomes submissions of original research, reviews, guidelines, and letters that are deemed to have a significant impact in the field. While the journal covers a wide range of topics, it particularly focuses on areas such as:
Preclinical studies of new compounds, especially those that provide mechanistic insights
Clinical trials and observations
Reviews related to new drugs and current management of hematologic malignancies
Novel observations related to new mutations, molecular pathways, and tumor genomics
Blood Cancer Journal offers a forum for expedited publication of novel observations regarding new mutations or altered pathways.