Therapy-related AML: long-term outcome in a large cohort of AML-patients with intensive and non-intensive therapy

IF 12.9 1区 医学 Q1 HEMATOLOGY Blood Cancer Journal Pub Date : 2024-09-16 DOI:10.1038/s41408-024-01140-5
Sophia Gross, Jana Ihlow, Leonie Busack, Kacper Adamiak, Jens Schrezenmeier, Julia Jesse, Michaela Schwarz, Anne Flörcken, Lam Giang Vuong, Kathrin Rieger, Jan Krönke, Philipp le Coutre, Vivien Boldt, Ann-Christin von Brünneck, David Horst, Thomas Burmeister, Igor-Wolfgang Blau, Ulrich Keller, Lars Bullinger, Jörg Westermann
{"title":"Therapy-related AML: long-term outcome in a large cohort of AML-patients with intensive and non-intensive therapy","authors":"Sophia Gross, Jana Ihlow, Leonie Busack, Kacper Adamiak, Jens Schrezenmeier, Julia Jesse, Michaela Schwarz, Anne Flörcken, Lam Giang Vuong, Kathrin Rieger, Jan Krönke, Philipp le Coutre, Vivien Boldt, Ann-Christin von Brünneck, David Horst, Thomas Burmeister, Igor-Wolfgang Blau, Ulrich Keller, Lars Bullinger, Jörg Westermann","doi":"10.1038/s41408-024-01140-5","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p>Therapy-related acute myeloid leukemia (t-AML) often exhibits adverse (genetic) features. There is ongoing discussion on the impact of t-AML on long-term outcome in AML. Therefore, we retrospectively analyzed clinical and biological characteristics of 1133 AML patients (225 t-AML patients and 908 de novo AML patients) with a median follow-up of 81.8 months. T-AML patients showed more adverse genetic alterations, higher age and more comorbidities as compared to de novo AML. Median OS in intensively treated t-AML patients was 13.7 months as compared to 39.4 months in de novo AML (<i>p</i> &lt; 0.001). With non-intensive therapy, OS did not differ significantly (<i>p</i> = 0.394). With intensive therapy, significant differences in favor of de novo AML were observed in the ELN intermediate I/II (<i>p</i> = 0.009) and adverse (<i>p</i> = 0.016) risk groups but not within favorable risk groups (APL <i>p</i> = 0.927, ELN favorable <i>p</i> = 0.714). However, t-AML was no independent risk factor for OS (<i>p</i> = 0.103), RR (<i>p</i> = 0.982) and NRM (<i>p</i> = 0.320) in the multivariate analysis. A limitation of our study is an ELN 2010 risk stratification due to a lack of more comprehensive molecular data according to ELN 2022. We conclude that therapeutic algorithms in t-AML, in particular with regard to allo-HSCT, should be guided by ELN genetic risk rather than classification as t-AML alone. Our data support the WHO and ICC 2022 classifications, which include t-AML as diagnostic qualifier rather than a separate subcategory.</p>","PeriodicalId":8989,"journal":{"name":"Blood Cancer Journal","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":12.9000,"publicationDate":"2024-09-16","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Blood Cancer Journal","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1038/s41408-024-01140-5","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"HEMATOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Therapy-related acute myeloid leukemia (t-AML) often exhibits adverse (genetic) features. There is ongoing discussion on the impact of t-AML on long-term outcome in AML. Therefore, we retrospectively analyzed clinical and biological characteristics of 1133 AML patients (225 t-AML patients and 908 de novo AML patients) with a median follow-up of 81.8 months. T-AML patients showed more adverse genetic alterations, higher age and more comorbidities as compared to de novo AML. Median OS in intensively treated t-AML patients was 13.7 months as compared to 39.4 months in de novo AML (p < 0.001). With non-intensive therapy, OS did not differ significantly (p = 0.394). With intensive therapy, significant differences in favor of de novo AML were observed in the ELN intermediate I/II (p = 0.009) and adverse (p = 0.016) risk groups but not within favorable risk groups (APL p = 0.927, ELN favorable p = 0.714). However, t-AML was no independent risk factor for OS (p = 0.103), RR (p = 0.982) and NRM (p = 0.320) in the multivariate analysis. A limitation of our study is an ELN 2010 risk stratification due to a lack of more comprehensive molecular data according to ELN 2022. We conclude that therapeutic algorithms in t-AML, in particular with regard to allo-HSCT, should be guided by ELN genetic risk rather than classification as t-AML alone. Our data support the WHO and ICC 2022 classifications, which include t-AML as diagnostic qualifier rather than a separate subcategory.

Abstract Image

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
与治疗相关的急性髓细胞性白血病:接受强化治疗和非强化治疗的大量急性髓细胞性白血病患者的长期治疗结果
与治疗相关的急性髓性白血病(t-AML)通常具有不良(遗传)特征。人们一直在讨论 t-AML 对急性髓细胞白血病长期预后的影响。因此,我们回顾性分析了 1133 例急性髓细胞白血病患者(225 例 t-AML 患者和 908 例新发急性髓细胞白血病患者)的临床和生物学特征,中位随访时间为 81.8 个月。与新生急性髓细胞性白血病相比,T-AML患者的不良基因改变更多,年龄更大,合并症更多。接受强化治疗的T-AML患者的中位OS为13.7个月,而新生AML患者的中位OS为39.4个月(p <0.001)。采用非强化治疗时,OS 没有显著差异(p = 0.394)。采用强化治疗时,在 ELN 中级 I/II 组(p = 0.009)和不良风险组(p = 0.016)中观察到有利于新发 AML 的显著差异,但在有利风险组中未观察到这种差异(APL p = 0.927,ELN 有利组 p = 0.714)。然而,在多变量分析中,t-AML不是OS(p = 0.103)、RR(p = 0.982)和NRM(p = 0.320)的独立危险因素。我们研究的局限性在于,由于缺乏更全面的分子数据,我们只能根据ELN 2022进行ELN 2010风险分层。我们的结论是,t-AML 的治疗算法,尤其是异体造血干细胞移植(allo-HSCT),应该以 ELN 遗传风险为指导,而不仅仅是 t-AML 的分类。我们的数据支持WHO和ICC 2022的分类,它们将t-AML作为诊断限定符,而不是单独的子类别。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
16.70
自引率
2.30%
发文量
153
审稿时长
>12 weeks
期刊介绍: Blood Cancer Journal is dedicated to publishing high-quality articles related to hematologic malignancies and related disorders. The journal welcomes submissions of original research, reviews, guidelines, and letters that are deemed to have a significant impact in the field. While the journal covers a wide range of topics, it particularly focuses on areas such as: Preclinical studies of new compounds, especially those that provide mechanistic insights Clinical trials and observations Reviews related to new drugs and current management of hematologic malignancies Novel observations related to new mutations, molecular pathways, and tumor genomics Blood Cancer Journal offers a forum for expedited publication of novel observations regarding new mutations or altered pathways.
期刊最新文献
Is CAR T a drug or a therapeutic pathway? Intention to treat versus per protocol analysis of real world studies of CAR-T cell therapy in relapsed refractory diffuse large B cell lymphoma Proteasome inhibitors related thrombotic microangiopathy: a systematic and comprehensive review Mosaic chromosomal alterations (mCAs) in individuals with monoclonal B-cell lymphocytosis (MBL) Neutrophil-to-lymphocyte ratio as a prognostic indicator of mortality in Polycythemia Vera: insights from a prospective cohort analysis Multi-omics reveal immune microenvironment alterations in multiple myeloma and its precursor stages
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1