A systematic review and meta analysis on digital mental health interventions in inpatient settings

IF 12.4 1区 医学 Q1 HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES NPJ Digital Medicine Pub Date : 2024-09-17 DOI:10.1038/s41746-024-01252-z
Alexander Diel, Isabel Carolin Schröter, Anna-Lena Frewer, Christoph Jansen, Anita Robitzsch, Gertraud Gradl-Dietsch, Martin Teufel, Alexander Bäuerle
{"title":"A systematic review and meta analysis on digital mental health interventions in inpatient settings","authors":"Alexander Diel, Isabel Carolin Schröter, Anna-Lena Frewer, Christoph Jansen, Anita Robitzsch, Gertraud Gradl-Dietsch, Martin Teufel, Alexander Bäuerle","doi":"10.1038/s41746-024-01252-z","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"E-mental health (EMH) interventions gain increasing importance in the treatment of mental health disorders. Their outpatient efficacy is well-established. However, research on EMH in inpatient settings remains sparse and lacks a meta-analytic synthesis. This paper presents a meta-analysis on the efficacy of EMH in inpatient settings. Searching multiple databases (PubMed, ScienceGov, PsycInfo, CENTRAL, references), 26 randomized controlled trial (RCT) EMH inpatient studies (n = 6112) with low or medium assessed risk of bias were included. A small significant total effect of EMH treatment was found (g = 0.3). The effect was significant both for blended interventions (g = 0.42) and post-treatment EMH-based aftercare (g = 0.29). EMH treatment yielded significant effects across different patient groups and types of therapy, and the effects remained stable post-treatment. The results show the efficacy of EMH treatment in inpatient settings. The meta-analysis is limited by the small number of included studies.","PeriodicalId":19349,"journal":{"name":"NPJ Digital Medicine","volume":" ","pages":"1-9"},"PeriodicalIF":12.4000,"publicationDate":"2024-09-17","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.nature.com/articles/s41746-024-01252-z.pdf","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"NPJ Digital Medicine","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://www.nature.com/articles/s41746-024-01252-z","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

E-mental health (EMH) interventions gain increasing importance in the treatment of mental health disorders. Their outpatient efficacy is well-established. However, research on EMH in inpatient settings remains sparse and lacks a meta-analytic synthesis. This paper presents a meta-analysis on the efficacy of EMH in inpatient settings. Searching multiple databases (PubMed, ScienceGov, PsycInfo, CENTRAL, references), 26 randomized controlled trial (RCT) EMH inpatient studies (n = 6112) with low or medium assessed risk of bias were included. A small significant total effect of EMH treatment was found (g = 0.3). The effect was significant both for blended interventions (g = 0.42) and post-treatment EMH-based aftercare (g = 0.29). EMH treatment yielded significant effects across different patient groups and types of therapy, and the effects remained stable post-treatment. The results show the efficacy of EMH treatment in inpatient settings. The meta-analysis is limited by the small number of included studies.

Abstract Image

Abstract Image

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
关于住院环境中数字心理健康干预措施的系统回顾和元分析
电子心理健康(EMH)干预措施在心理健康疾病治疗中的重要性与日俱增。其门诊疗效已得到公认。然而,有关住院环境中电子心理健康干预的研究仍然很少,也缺乏荟萃分析。本文对EMH在住院环境中的疗效进行了荟萃分析。通过检索多个数据库(PubMed、ScienceGov、PsycInfo、CENTRAL、参考文献),纳入了26项随机对照试验(RCT)EMH住院研究(n = 6112),这些研究的偏倚风险评估为低或中等。研究发现,EMH治疗的总效果很小(g = 0.3)。混合干预(g = 0.42)和基于EMH的治疗后后续护理(g = 0.29)的效果都很明显。在不同的患者群体和治疗类型中,EMH治疗都产生了明显的效果,而且效果在治疗后保持稳定。结果表明,EMH疗法在住院环境中具有疗效。荟萃分析因纳入的研究数量较少而受到限制。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
25.10
自引率
3.30%
发文量
170
审稿时长
15 weeks
期刊介绍: npj Digital Medicine is an online open-access journal that focuses on publishing peer-reviewed research in the field of digital medicine. The journal covers various aspects of digital medicine, including the application and implementation of digital and mobile technologies in clinical settings, virtual healthcare, and the use of artificial intelligence and informatics. The primary goal of the journal is to support innovation and the advancement of healthcare through the integration of new digital and mobile technologies. When determining if a manuscript is suitable for publication, the journal considers four important criteria: novelty, clinical relevance, scientific rigor, and digital innovation.
期刊最新文献
Learning from the EHR to implement AI in healthcare A data-driven framework for identifying patient subgroups on which an AI/machine learning model may underperform Phenotype driven molecular genetic test recommendation for diagnosing pediatric rare disorders Systematic review to understand users perspectives on AI-enabled decision aids to inform shared decision making The quality and safety of using generative AI to produce patient-centred discharge instructions
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1