A Meta-Analysis of the Relations Between Achievement Goals and Internalizing Problems

IF 10.1 1区 心理学 Q1 PSYCHOLOGY, EDUCATIONAL Educational Psychology Review Pub Date : 2024-09-16 DOI:10.1007/s10648-024-09943-5
Loredana R. Diaconu-Gherasim, Andrew J. Elliot, Alexandra S. Zancu, Laura E. Brumariu, Cornelia Măirean, Cristian Opariuc‑Dan, Irina Crumpei-Tanasă
{"title":"A Meta-Analysis of the Relations Between Achievement Goals and Internalizing Problems","authors":"Loredana R. Diaconu-Gherasim, Andrew J. Elliot, Alexandra S. Zancu, Laura E. Brumariu, Cornelia Măirean, Cristian Opariuc‑Dan, Irina Crumpei-Tanasă","doi":"10.1007/s10648-024-09943-5","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p>This systematic meta-analytic review investigated the relations between achievement goals and internalizing symptoms and disorders, namely, anxiety and depression. The number of samples for each focal relationship ranged from 3 to 36. The results indicated significant effect sizes for the relations between mastery-approach goals and anxiety (<i>r</i> = − .10) and depression (r = − .18), as well as performance-avoidance goals and anxiety (<i>r</i> = .25) and depression (<i>r</i> = .16). A significant effect size was also found for the relation between performance-approach goals and anxiety (<i>r</i> = .15), and a non-significant effect size was observed for the relation between performance-approach goals and depression (<i>r</i> = .05). Mastery-avoidance goals were not significantly related to either anxiety (<i>r</i> = .08) or depression (<i>r</i> = − .13). Several moderators representing the conceptualization of achievement goals (e.g., theoretical model), sample characteristics (e.g., education level), and methodology- and publication-based characteristics (e.g., year of publication) were significant, and suggested avenues for future research. These findings herein have implications for intervention programs that could focus on reducing the links between achievement goals and internalizing problems.</p>","PeriodicalId":48344,"journal":{"name":"Educational Psychology Review","volume":"19 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":10.1000,"publicationDate":"2024-09-16","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Educational Psychology Review","FirstCategoryId":"102","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s10648-024-09943-5","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"心理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"PSYCHOLOGY, EDUCATIONAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

This systematic meta-analytic review investigated the relations between achievement goals and internalizing symptoms and disorders, namely, anxiety and depression. The number of samples for each focal relationship ranged from 3 to 36. The results indicated significant effect sizes for the relations between mastery-approach goals and anxiety (r = − .10) and depression (r = − .18), as well as performance-avoidance goals and anxiety (r = .25) and depression (r = .16). A significant effect size was also found for the relation between performance-approach goals and anxiety (r = .15), and a non-significant effect size was observed for the relation between performance-approach goals and depression (r = .05). Mastery-avoidance goals were not significantly related to either anxiety (r = .08) or depression (r = − .13). Several moderators representing the conceptualization of achievement goals (e.g., theoretical model), sample characteristics (e.g., education level), and methodology- and publication-based characteristics (e.g., year of publication) were significant, and suggested avenues for future research. These findings herein have implications for intervention programs that could focus on reducing the links between achievement goals and internalizing problems.

Abstract Image

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
成就目标与内化问题之间关系的元分析
本系统性荟萃分析综述调查了成就目标与内化症状和障碍(即焦虑和抑郁)之间的关系。每种焦点关系的样本数量从 3 个到 36 个不等。结果表明,掌握-追求目标与焦虑(r = - .10)和抑郁(r = - .18)之间的关系,以及成绩-回避目标与焦虑(r = .25)和抑郁(r = .16)之间的关系,都有明显的效应大小。研究还发现,成绩接近目标与焦虑(r = .15)之间的关系有明显的效应大小,而成绩接近目标与抑郁(r = .05)之间的关系则没有明显的效应大小。掌握-逃避目标与焦虑(r = .08)或抑郁(r = - .13)的关系都不显著。代表成就目标概念化(如理论模型)、样本特征(如教育水平)以及方法论和出版物特征(如出版物年份)的几个调节因子具有重要意义,并为未来研究提供了途径。这些研究结果对干预计划有一定的启示,干预计划可以重点减少成就目标与内化问题之间的联系。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Educational Psychology Review
Educational Psychology Review PSYCHOLOGY, EDUCATIONAL-
CiteScore
15.70
自引率
3.00%
发文量
62
期刊介绍: Educational Psychology Review aims to disseminate knowledge and promote dialogue within the field of educational psychology. It serves as a platform for the publication of various types of articles, including peer-reviewed integrative reviews, special thematic issues, reflections on previous research or new research directions, interviews, and research-based advice for practitioners. The journal caters to a diverse readership, ranging from generalists in educational psychology to experts in specific areas of the discipline. The content offers a comprehensive coverage of topics and provides in-depth information to meet the needs of both specialized researchers and practitioners.
期刊最新文献
On Being Accepted: Interrogating How University Cultural Scripts Shape Personal and Political Facets of Belonging Linking Disparate Strands: A Critical Review of the Relationship Between Creativity and Education Exploring the Nature-Creativity Connection Across Different Settings: A Scoping Review Bold, Humble, Collaborative, and Virtuous: The Future of Theory Development in Educational Psychology Effects of School-led Greenspace Interventions on Mental, Physical and Social Wellbeing in Children and Adolescents: A Systematic Review
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1