Integrated ground-penetrating radar and electromagnetic induction offer a non-destructive approach to predict soil bulk density in boreal podzolic soil

IF 5.6 1区 农林科学 Q1 SOIL SCIENCE Geoderma Pub Date : 2024-09-16 DOI:10.1016/j.geoderma.2024.117028
Sashini Pathirana, Sébastien Lambot, Manokararajah Krishnapillai, Mumtaz Cheema, Christina Smeaton, Lakshman Galagedara
{"title":"Integrated ground-penetrating radar and electromagnetic induction offer a non-destructive approach to predict soil bulk density in boreal podzolic soil","authors":"Sashini Pathirana, Sébastien Lambot, Manokararajah Krishnapillai, Mumtaz Cheema, Christina Smeaton, Lakshman Galagedara","doi":"10.1016/j.geoderma.2024.117028","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Tillage and soil compaction affect soil properties, processes, and state variables influencing soil health, hydrodynamics, and crop growth. Assessing soil compaction levels using traditional methods, such as soil sampling and penetration resistance, is inefficient for scaling up from plot to field scales. Geophysical methods like Ground-penetrating Radar (GPR) and Electromagnetic Induction (EMI) are becoming prominent for assessing soil properties and state variables in agriculture due to their ability to overcome the limitations of traditional methods. However, a research gap exists in non-destructively estimating bulk density changes related to tillage and soil compaction. This study aimed to (1) assess the influence of soil compaction on GPR and EMI responses in boreal podzolic soil and (2) develop and evaluate prediction models to determine soil bulk density using GPR and EMI. The experiment was conducted by compacting loamy sand-textured soil using a lawn roller. GPR data were collected to determine the soil dielectric constant (K) and the direct ground wave amplitude (A), along with EMI-measured apparent electrical conductivity (EC) under three compaction levels (no, four and ten roller passes). Relationships between K, A and EC and the average bulk density of 0–0.30 m depth at three compaction levels were tested. A Random Forest (RF) regression approach was employed to identify the most significant variables for predicting bulk density. Simple and multiple linear regression (SLR and MLR, respectively) models were developed using EC and K and were subsequently evaluated. Results revealed significant differences between the measured bulk density and geophysical data across the tested compaction levels. During the model development, SLR and MLR showed > 0.65, and the model evaluation showed a root mean square error of < 0.14 g/cm. This study highlights the potential of using GPR and EMI for the non-destructive prediction of bulk density in the agricultural landscape. However, further research is needed to explore the applicability and limitations of this approach across varying water contents, electrical conductivities, and soil types.","PeriodicalId":12511,"journal":{"name":"Geoderma","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":5.6000,"publicationDate":"2024-09-16","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Geoderma","FirstCategoryId":"97","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.geoderma.2024.117028","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"农林科学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"SOIL SCIENCE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Tillage and soil compaction affect soil properties, processes, and state variables influencing soil health, hydrodynamics, and crop growth. Assessing soil compaction levels using traditional methods, such as soil sampling and penetration resistance, is inefficient for scaling up from plot to field scales. Geophysical methods like Ground-penetrating Radar (GPR) and Electromagnetic Induction (EMI) are becoming prominent for assessing soil properties and state variables in agriculture due to their ability to overcome the limitations of traditional methods. However, a research gap exists in non-destructively estimating bulk density changes related to tillage and soil compaction. This study aimed to (1) assess the influence of soil compaction on GPR and EMI responses in boreal podzolic soil and (2) develop and evaluate prediction models to determine soil bulk density using GPR and EMI. The experiment was conducted by compacting loamy sand-textured soil using a lawn roller. GPR data were collected to determine the soil dielectric constant (K) and the direct ground wave amplitude (A), along with EMI-measured apparent electrical conductivity (EC) under three compaction levels (no, four and ten roller passes). Relationships between K, A and EC and the average bulk density of 0–0.30 m depth at three compaction levels were tested. A Random Forest (RF) regression approach was employed to identify the most significant variables for predicting bulk density. Simple and multiple linear regression (SLR and MLR, respectively) models were developed using EC and K and were subsequently evaluated. Results revealed significant differences between the measured bulk density and geophysical data across the tested compaction levels. During the model development, SLR and MLR showed > 0.65, and the model evaluation showed a root mean square error of < 0.14 g/cm. This study highlights the potential of using GPR and EMI for the non-destructive prediction of bulk density in the agricultural landscape. However, further research is needed to explore the applicability and limitations of this approach across varying water contents, electrical conductivities, and soil types.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
综合探地雷达和电磁感应技术为预测北方豆荚状土壤容重提供了一种无损方法
耕作和土壤压实会影响土壤性质、过程和状态变量,从而影响土壤健康、流体力学和作物生长。使用土壤取样和穿透阻力等传统方法评估土壤压实程度,对于从地块扩大到田间规模而言效率低下。由于能够克服传统方法的局限性,探地雷达(GPR)和电磁感应(EMI)等地球物理方法在评估土壤特性和农业状态变量方面正变得越来越重要。然而,在非破坏性地估计与耕作和土壤压实有关的容重变化方面还存在研究空白。本研究旨在:(1)评估土壤压实对北方豆荚状土壤中 GPR 和 EMI 响应的影响;(2)开发和评估预测模型,以使用 GPR 和 EMI 确定土壤容重。实验使用草坪压路机压实壤质砂土。收集了 GPR 数据,以确定土壤介电常数 (K) 和直接地波振幅 (A),以及三种压实水平(无压实、四压实和十压实)下 EMI 测量的表观导电率 (EC)。测试了 K、A 和 EC 与三个压实度下 0-0.30 米深度的平均容重之间的关系。采用随机森林(RF)回归法来确定预测容重的最重要变量。利用 EC 和 K 建立了简单和多元线性回归(分别为 SLR 和 MLR)模型,并随后进行了评估。结果表明,在所有测试的压实水平上,测量的体积密度与地球物理数据之间存在明显差异。在模型开发过程中,SLR 和 MLR 均大于 0.65,模型评估显示均方根误差小于 0.14 克/厘米。这项研究强调了使用 GPR 和 EMI 对农业景观中的体积密度进行非破坏性预测的潜力。不过,还需要进一步研究探讨这种方法在不同含水量、电导率和土壤类型中的适用性和局限性。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Geoderma
Geoderma 农林科学-土壤科学
CiteScore
11.80
自引率
6.60%
发文量
597
审稿时长
58 days
期刊介绍: Geoderma - the global journal of soil science - welcomes authors, readers and soil research from all parts of the world, encourages worldwide soil studies, and embraces all aspects of soil science and its associated pedagogy. The journal particularly welcomes interdisciplinary work focusing on dynamic soil processes and functions across space and time.
期刊最新文献
Prediction and spatial–temporal changes of soil organic matter in the Huanghuaihai Plain by combining legacy and recent data Biomarkers evidence shows a preferential occlusion of microbial necromass in mineral-associated and not particle organic matter Legume cover crops sequester more soil organic carbon than non-legume cover crops by stimulating microbial transformations Integrated ground-penetrating radar and electromagnetic induction offer a non-destructive approach to predict soil bulk density in boreal podzolic soil Effects of soil heating changes on soil hydraulic properties in Central Chile
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1