Decoding Musical Neural Activity in Patients With Disorders of Consciousness Through Self-Supervised Contrastive Domain Generalization

IF 9.8 2区 计算机科学 Q1 COMPUTER SCIENCE, ARTIFICIAL INTELLIGENCE IEEE Transactions on Affective Computing Pub Date : 2024-09-17 DOI:10.1109/TAFFC.2024.3462603
Honghua Cai;Jiahui Pan;Qiuyi Xiao;Jiarui Jin;Yuanqing Li;Qiuyou Xie
{"title":"Decoding Musical Neural Activity in Patients With Disorders of Consciousness Through Self-Supervised Contrastive Domain Generalization","authors":"Honghua Cai;Jiahui Pan;Qiuyi Xiao;Jiarui Jin;Yuanqing Li;Qiuyou Xie","doi":"10.1109/TAFFC.2024.3462603","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Identifying the brain responses of patients with disorders of consciousness (DOCs), which include comas, vegetative states (VSs, also called unresponsive wakefulness syndrome (UWS)) and minimally conscious states (MCSs), based on electroencephalography (EEG) has important clinical diagnosis implications. However, due to impaired motor and cognitive abilities, patients with DOCs may not be able to express their feelings and their brain responses to different stimuli, making it difficult to correctly label data. EEG classification algorithms trained with these data cannot make reliable classifications and predictions for clinical diagnosis purposes. To identify the brain responses produced for different types of stimuli in patients with DOCs, we proposed a self-supervised contrastive domain generalization framework (SSCDG) for cross-subject EEG classification. The model was first trained with healthy-subject EEG data induced by different stimuli to learn their corresponding unsupervised representations. Then, we used these representations to train a classifier to predict the emotional states of patients with DOCs under the corresponding stimuli. SSCDG was first evaluated on the SEED dataset, and it achieved an accuracy of 87.6%, which was 1.1% higher than that of the state-of-the-art (SOTA) approaches. Moreover, the SSCDG method was utilized to categorize EEG data acquired from seventeen DOC patients, including eleven in a UWS state and six in an MCS state, with seven patients demonstrating notable accuracy in three-class EEG classification tasks. The SSCDG results indicated that the seven patients with DOCs may have shown classifiable EEG responses to the presented stimuli.","PeriodicalId":13131,"journal":{"name":"IEEE Transactions on Affective Computing","volume":"16 2","pages":"726-743"},"PeriodicalIF":9.8000,"publicationDate":"2024-09-17","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"IEEE Transactions on Affective Computing","FirstCategoryId":"94","ListUrlMain":"https://ieeexplore.ieee.org/document/10681490/","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"计算机科学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"COMPUTER SCIENCE, ARTIFICIAL INTELLIGENCE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Identifying the brain responses of patients with disorders of consciousness (DOCs), which include comas, vegetative states (VSs, also called unresponsive wakefulness syndrome (UWS)) and minimally conscious states (MCSs), based on electroencephalography (EEG) has important clinical diagnosis implications. However, due to impaired motor and cognitive abilities, patients with DOCs may not be able to express their feelings and their brain responses to different stimuli, making it difficult to correctly label data. EEG classification algorithms trained with these data cannot make reliable classifications and predictions for clinical diagnosis purposes. To identify the brain responses produced for different types of stimuli in patients with DOCs, we proposed a self-supervised contrastive domain generalization framework (SSCDG) for cross-subject EEG classification. The model was first trained with healthy-subject EEG data induced by different stimuli to learn their corresponding unsupervised representations. Then, we used these representations to train a classifier to predict the emotional states of patients with DOCs under the corresponding stimuli. SSCDG was first evaluated on the SEED dataset, and it achieved an accuracy of 87.6%, which was 1.1% higher than that of the state-of-the-art (SOTA) approaches. Moreover, the SSCDG method was utilized to categorize EEG data acquired from seventeen DOC patients, including eleven in a UWS state and six in an MCS state, with seven patients demonstrating notable accuracy in three-class EEG classification tasks. The SSCDG results indicated that the seven patients with DOCs may have shown classifiable EEG responses to the presented stimuli.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
通过自监督对比领域泛化解码意识障碍患者的音乐神经活动
基于脑电图(EEG)识别意识障碍(doc)患者的大脑反应,包括昏迷、植物人状态(VSs,也称为无反应性清醒综合征(UWS))和最低意识状态(MCSs),具有重要的临床诊断意义。然而,由于运动和认知能力受损,doc患者可能无法表达自己的感受和大脑对不同刺激的反应,这使得正确标记数据变得困难。用这些数据训练的脑电分类算法不能为临床诊断做出可靠的分类和预测。为了确定doc患者对不同类型刺激产生的大脑反应,我们提出了一个自监督对比域泛化框架(SSCDG)用于跨受试者EEG分类。首先用不同刺激诱导的健康受试者脑电数据对模型进行训练,学习相应的无监督表征。然后,我们使用这些表征来训练分类器来预测相应刺激下doc患者的情绪状态。SSCDG首先在SEED数据集上进行了评估,其准确率达到87.6%,比最先进的(SOTA)方法高出1.1%。此外,利用SSCDG方法对17例DOC患者的脑电数据进行了分类,其中11例处于UWS状态,6例处于MCS状态,其中7例患者在三类脑电分类任务中表现出显著的准确性。SSCDG结果表明,7例doc患者可能对所呈现的刺激表现出可分类的EEG反应。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
IEEE Transactions on Affective Computing
IEEE Transactions on Affective Computing COMPUTER SCIENCE, ARTIFICIAL INTELLIGENCE-COMPUTER SCIENCE, CYBERNETICS
CiteScore
15.00
自引率
6.20%
发文量
174
期刊介绍: The IEEE Transactions on Affective Computing is an international and interdisciplinary journal. Its primary goal is to share research findings on the development of systems capable of recognizing, interpreting, and simulating human emotions and related affective phenomena. The journal publishes original research on the underlying principles and theories that explain how and why affective factors shape human-technology interactions. It also focuses on how techniques for sensing and simulating affect can enhance our understanding of human emotions and processes. Additionally, the journal explores the design, implementation, and evaluation of systems that prioritize the consideration of affect in their usability. We also welcome surveys of existing work that provide new perspectives on the historical and future directions of this field.
期刊最新文献
Hierarchical Dynamics Aggregation Network for Speech-based Depression Detection Bootstrap Wayfinding Questions to Elicit Emotion Shift Reasoning with Large Language Models PersonalityLLM: Fine-tuning Large Language Models for Personality Assessment from Asynchronous Video Interviews Gait Emotion Recognition via Uncertainty-oriented Class Discriminative Learning MGMIN-FSA: A Multi-Granularity Multimodal Interaction Network for Sentiment Analysis of Financial Review Videos
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1