Impact of polyvinyl alcohol application and wheat straw mulching on soil loss and infiltration rate in semi-arid tropics

IF 5.7 3区 环境科学与生态学 Q1 WATER RESOURCES Applied Water Science Pub Date : 2024-09-18 DOI:10.1007/s13201-024-02290-4
Mahesh Chand Singh, Gaganpreet Singh, Chetak Bishnoi, Anurag Malik, Nadhir Al-Ansari, Mohamed A. Mattar
{"title":"Impact of polyvinyl alcohol application and wheat straw mulching on soil loss and infiltration rate in semi-arid tropics","authors":"Mahesh Chand Singh,&nbsp;Gaganpreet Singh,&nbsp;Chetak Bishnoi,&nbsp;Anurag Malik,&nbsp;Nadhir Al-Ansari,&nbsp;Mohamed A. Mattar","doi":"10.1007/s13201-024-02290-4","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>A study was conducted at Punjab Agricultural University, Ludhiana, Punjab, with the aim of monitoring soil loss and infiltration rate in loamy sand soil. The study focused on the effects of applying polyvinyl alcohol (PVA) and mulch under simulated rainfall conditions. The experimental setup involved testing three levels of PVA (0.5%, 0.75%, and 1.0%), one level of wheat-straw mulch (600 g/m<sup>2</sup>), and a Control treatment (untreated soil). Each of these treatments was replicated four times. The lowest soil loss (20.9 g/m<sup>2</sup>) was recorded under the 1.0% PVA treatment, while the highest (120.1 g/m<sup>2</sup>) was seen under the 0.5% PVA treatment. The 1.0% PVA treatment showed a significant reduction in soil loss compared to the 0.5% PVA, 0.75% PVA, mulch, and Control treatments, with reductions of approximately 82.6%, 45.1%, 81.2%, and 89.6%, respectively. Regarding infiltration rates, the Control treatment exhibited the lowest rate (2.4 cm/h), while the 1.0% PVA treatment displayed the highest rate (9.6 cm/h). Additionally, the use of mulch led to a 44.7% reduction in soil loss compared to the treatment without mulch, likely due to the mitigated impact of raindrops. The infiltration rate was significantly higher (4.8 cm/h) under the mulched treatment compared to the unmulched treatment (2.4 cm/h). Overall, the application of PVA and mulch resulted in a drastic reduction in soil loss, likely attributable to the enhanced stability of soil aggregates, improved infiltration rate, and reduced runoff.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":8374,"journal":{"name":"Applied Water Science","volume":"14 10","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":5.7000,"publicationDate":"2024-09-18","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://link.springer.com/content/pdf/10.1007/s13201-024-02290-4.pdf","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Applied Water Science","FirstCategoryId":"93","ListUrlMain":"https://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/s13201-024-02290-4","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"环境科学与生态学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"WATER RESOURCES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

A study was conducted at Punjab Agricultural University, Ludhiana, Punjab, with the aim of monitoring soil loss and infiltration rate in loamy sand soil. The study focused on the effects of applying polyvinyl alcohol (PVA) and mulch under simulated rainfall conditions. The experimental setup involved testing three levels of PVA (0.5%, 0.75%, and 1.0%), one level of wheat-straw mulch (600 g/m2), and a Control treatment (untreated soil). Each of these treatments was replicated four times. The lowest soil loss (20.9 g/m2) was recorded under the 1.0% PVA treatment, while the highest (120.1 g/m2) was seen under the 0.5% PVA treatment. The 1.0% PVA treatment showed a significant reduction in soil loss compared to the 0.5% PVA, 0.75% PVA, mulch, and Control treatments, with reductions of approximately 82.6%, 45.1%, 81.2%, and 89.6%, respectively. Regarding infiltration rates, the Control treatment exhibited the lowest rate (2.4 cm/h), while the 1.0% PVA treatment displayed the highest rate (9.6 cm/h). Additionally, the use of mulch led to a 44.7% reduction in soil loss compared to the treatment without mulch, likely due to the mitigated impact of raindrops. The infiltration rate was significantly higher (4.8 cm/h) under the mulched treatment compared to the unmulched treatment (2.4 cm/h). Overall, the application of PVA and mulch resulted in a drastic reduction in soil loss, likely attributable to the enhanced stability of soil aggregates, improved infiltration rate, and reduced runoff.

Abstract Image

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
施用聚乙烯醇和小麦秸秆覆盖物对半干旱热带地区土壤流失和渗透率的影响
旁遮普省卢迪亚纳的旁遮普农业大学开展了一项研究,目的是监测壤质砂土的土壤流失和渗透率。研究重点是在模拟降雨条件下施用聚乙烯醇(PVA)和覆盖物的效果。实验设置包括测试三种水平的 PVA(0.5%、0.75% 和 1.0%)、一种水平的麦秸覆盖物(600 克/平方米)和一种对照处理(未处理的土壤)。每个处理重复四次。1.0% PVA 处理的土壤流失量最低(20.9 克/平方米),而 0.5% PVA 处理的土壤流失量最高(120.1 克/平方米)。与 0.5% PVA、0.75% PVA、覆盖物和对照处理相比,1.0% PVA 处理的土壤流失量显著减少,分别减少了约 82.6%、45.1%、81.2% 和 89.6%。在渗透率方面,对照组处理的渗透率最低(2.4 厘米/小时),而 1.0% PVA 处理的渗透率最高(9.6 厘米/小时)。此外,与不使用覆盖物的处理相比,使用覆盖物使土壤流失减少了 44.7%,这可能是由于雨滴的影响得到了缓解。与未覆盖地膜的处理(2.4 厘米/小时)相比,覆盖地膜的处理的渗透率(4.8 厘米/小时)明显更高。总体而言,施用 PVA 和覆盖物后,土壤流失量大幅减少,这可能归因于土壤团聚体的稳定性增强、渗透率提高以及径流减少。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Applied Water Science
Applied Water Science WATER RESOURCES-
CiteScore
9.90
自引率
3.60%
发文量
268
审稿时长
13 weeks
期刊介绍:
期刊最新文献
Analytical study on 2D groundwater flow in a sloping unconfined aquifer under spatiotemporal recharge Evaluation of ZnO/NiO/kaolin nanocomposite as a sorbent/photocatalyst in hybrid water remediation process Water desalination using atmospheric pressure plasma combined with thermal treatment Studying the kinetic energy budget and moisture transport during a severe case of cyclogenesis Advanced reference crop evapotranspiration prediction: a novel framework combining neural nets, bee optimization algorithm, and mode decomposition
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1