Multidisciplinary team meetings and their impact on survival in rectal cancer. Population-based analysis in Catalonia (Spain)

IF 3.5 2区 医学 Q2 ONCOLOGY Ejso Pub Date : 2024-09-12 DOI:10.1016/j.ejso.2024.108675
{"title":"Multidisciplinary team meetings and their impact on survival in rectal cancer. Population-based analysis in Catalonia (Spain)","authors":"","doi":"10.1016/j.ejso.2024.108675","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Background</h3><p>Multidisciplinary team meetings (MTMs) are considered a pillar of cancer care; however, evidence of the independent benefit of MTMs on survival in rectal cancer is controversial.</p></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><p>This population-based cohort analysis included patients undergoing surgery for primary rectal cancer with curative intent. We drew data derived from three clinical audits conducted in Catalonia from 2011 to 2020. The primary outcome was 2-year survival. Multivariable Cox regression analysis was used to assess the hazard ratio for death in patients whose cases were versus were not discussed in a preoperative MTM.</p></div><div><h3>Results</h3><p>A total of 5249 patients were included (66.1 % male, 58.3 % aged 60–79 years, 63.2 % receiving anterior resection): 4096 cases were discussed in a preoperative MTM, and 1153 were not. Multivariable Cox proportional hazards regression analysis showed that the MTM group had better survival than those with no preoperative MTM (hazard ratio 1.22, 95 % confidence interval 1.02–1.48), after adjusting for potential confounders.</p></div><div><h3>Conclusions</h3><p>Preoperative MTM may be associated with improved survival in patients with rectal cancer in Catalonia. Efforts to ensure universal access to MTMs for all newly diagnosed patients should be supported.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":11522,"journal":{"name":"Ejso","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":3.5000,"publicationDate":"2024-09-12","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Ejso","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0748798324007273","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"ONCOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background

Multidisciplinary team meetings (MTMs) are considered a pillar of cancer care; however, evidence of the independent benefit of MTMs on survival in rectal cancer is controversial.

Methods

This population-based cohort analysis included patients undergoing surgery for primary rectal cancer with curative intent. We drew data derived from three clinical audits conducted in Catalonia from 2011 to 2020. The primary outcome was 2-year survival. Multivariable Cox regression analysis was used to assess the hazard ratio for death in patients whose cases were versus were not discussed in a preoperative MTM.

Results

A total of 5249 patients were included (66.1 % male, 58.3 % aged 60–79 years, 63.2 % receiving anterior resection): 4096 cases were discussed in a preoperative MTM, and 1153 were not. Multivariable Cox proportional hazards regression analysis showed that the MTM group had better survival than those with no preoperative MTM (hazard ratio 1.22, 95 % confidence interval 1.02–1.48), after adjusting for potential confounders.

Conclusions

Preoperative MTM may be associated with improved survival in patients with rectal cancer in Catalonia. Efforts to ensure universal access to MTMs for all newly diagnosed patients should be supported.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
背景多学科团队会议(MTMs)被认为是癌症护理的支柱;然而,MTMs 对直肠癌患者生存率的独立益处的证据尚存争议。我们从 2011 年至 2020 年在加泰罗尼亚进行的三次临床审计中提取了数据。主要结果是两年生存率。我们使用多变量 Cox 回归分析来评估术前 MTM 讨论与未讨论病例患者的死亡危险比。结果共纳入 5249 例患者(66.1% 为男性,58.3% 年龄在 60-79 岁之间,63.2% 接受前切除术):4096例患者在术前进行了MTM讨论,1153例未进行MTM讨论。多变量考克斯比例危险回归分析显示,在调整了潜在的混杂因素后,术前 MTM 组的生存率高于未进行术前 MTM 的患者(危险比为 1.22,95% 置信区间为 1.02-1.48)。应支持确保所有新确诊患者都能接受 MTM 的努力。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Ejso
Ejso 医学-外科
CiteScore
6.40
自引率
2.60%
发文量
1148
审稿时长
41 days
期刊介绍: JSO - European Journal of Surgical Oncology ("the Journal of Cancer Surgery") is the Official Journal of the European Society of Surgical Oncology and BASO ~ the Association for Cancer Surgery. The EJSO aims to advance surgical oncology research and practice through the publication of original research articles, review articles, editorials, debates and correspondence.
期刊最新文献
Editorial Board Calendar of events IFC: Filler advert_sciencedirect_210x280.pdf Filler advert_pharmapendium_2021_210x280.pdf Filler advert_scopus_2021_210x280.pdf
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1