Early-stage implementation of peer-led interventions for emergency department patients with substance use disorder: Findings from a formative qualitative evaluation

{"title":"Early-stage implementation of peer-led interventions for emergency department patients with substance use disorder: Findings from a formative qualitative evaluation","authors":"","doi":"10.1016/j.josat.2024.209518","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Introduction</h3><p>Emergency department (ED)-based peer recovery coach (PRC) programs can improve access to substance use disorder treatment (SUD) for ED patients. As literature on early stages of PRC implementation is limited, we conducted a qualitative assessment of ED PRC program implementation from several US-based PRC programs focusing on barriers and facilitators for implementation and providing recommendations based on the findings.</p></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><p>We collected qualitative data from 39 key informants (peer recovery coaches, PRC program managers, ED physicians and staff, representatives of community-based organizations) via 6 focus groups and 21 interviews in February–December 2023. We transcribed audio-recordings and analyzed data using codebook thematic analysis.</p></div><div><h3>Results</h3><p>We identified the following major themes related to specific barriers and recommendations to address them. To facilitate <em>timely linkage to PRCs</em>, programs would regularly inform ED staff about the program and its linkage procedures, establish trust between PRC and ED staff, streamline the linkage procedures, and choose an “opt-out” linkage approach. To address barriers related to <em>external referrals,</em> programs use “warm handoff” and “warm line” strategies, maintain and update a comprehensive catalog of resources, and familiarize peer coaches with local service providers. <em>Telehealth services</em> implementation requires addressing logistical barriers, ensuring patients' privacy, and training peer coaches on building trust and rapport online. Peer coaches' <em>wellness and quality of services</em> can be improved by limiting PRC's workload, prioritizing quality over quantity, facilitating self-, peer- and professional care to mitigate stress and burnout; and, importantly, by providing supportive supervision and training to peer coaches and advocating for PRC team as an equal partner in the ED settings. To facilitate PRC <em>program adoption and sustainment</em> program managers engage local communities and program champions, seek diverse sources of funding, and advocate for structural changes to accommodate recruitment and retention of peer recovery coaches.</p></div><div><h3>Conclusions</h3><p>We compiled a wealth of best practices used by PRC programs to address numerous implementation barriers and challenges. These recommendations are intended for PRC program planners, managers and champions, hospital leadership, and state and local public health agencies leading SUD epidemic response.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":73960,"journal":{"name":"Journal of substance use and addiction treatment","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-09-13","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of substance use and addiction treatment","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2949875924002303","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"0","JCRName":"PSYCHOLOGY, CLINICAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Introduction

Emergency department (ED)-based peer recovery coach (PRC) programs can improve access to substance use disorder treatment (SUD) for ED patients. As literature on early stages of PRC implementation is limited, we conducted a qualitative assessment of ED PRC program implementation from several US-based PRC programs focusing on barriers and facilitators for implementation and providing recommendations based on the findings.

Methods

We collected qualitative data from 39 key informants (peer recovery coaches, PRC program managers, ED physicians and staff, representatives of community-based organizations) via 6 focus groups and 21 interviews in February–December 2023. We transcribed audio-recordings and analyzed data using codebook thematic analysis.

Results

We identified the following major themes related to specific barriers and recommendations to address them. To facilitate timely linkage to PRCs, programs would regularly inform ED staff about the program and its linkage procedures, establish trust between PRC and ED staff, streamline the linkage procedures, and choose an “opt-out” linkage approach. To address barriers related to external referrals, programs use “warm handoff” and “warm line” strategies, maintain and update a comprehensive catalog of resources, and familiarize peer coaches with local service providers. Telehealth services implementation requires addressing logistical barriers, ensuring patients' privacy, and training peer coaches on building trust and rapport online. Peer coaches' wellness and quality of services can be improved by limiting PRC's workload, prioritizing quality over quantity, facilitating self-, peer- and professional care to mitigate stress and burnout; and, importantly, by providing supportive supervision and training to peer coaches and advocating for PRC team as an equal partner in the ED settings. To facilitate PRC program adoption and sustainment program managers engage local communities and program champions, seek diverse sources of funding, and advocate for structural changes to accommodate recruitment and retention of peer recovery coaches.

Conclusions

We compiled a wealth of best practices used by PRC programs to address numerous implementation barriers and challenges. These recommendations are intended for PRC program planners, managers and champions, hospital leadership, and state and local public health agencies leading SUD epidemic response.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
针对急诊科药物使用障碍患者的同伴引导干预措施的早期实施:形成性定性评估结果
导言:基于急诊科(ED)的同伴康复指导(PRC)项目可以改善急诊科患者获得药物使用障碍治疗(SUD)的机会。由于有关同伴康复教练项目早期实施阶段的文献有限,我们从几个美国的同伴康复教练项目中对急诊科同伴康复教练项目的实施情况进行了定性评估,重点关注实施过程中的障碍和促进因素,并根据评估结果提出建议。方法我们在 2023 年 2 月至 12 月期间通过 6 个焦点小组和 21 次访谈收集了 39 位关键信息提供者(同伴康复教练、同伴康复教练项目经理、急诊科医生和工作人员、社区组织代表)的定性数据。我们对录音进行了转录,并使用编码本主题分析法对数据进行了分析。结果我们确定了以下与具体障碍相关的主要主题以及解决这些障碍的建议。为便于及时与 PRC 建立联系,项目应定期向教育部门员工介绍项目及其联系程序,在 PRC 和教育部门员工之间建立信任,简化联系程序,并选择 "选择退出 "的联系方法。为了解决与外部转介相关的障碍,项目会使用 "温暖交接 "和 "温暖热线 "策略,维护和更新综合资源目录,并让同伴辅导员熟悉当地的服务提供者。远程保健服务的实施需要解决后勤障碍,确保患者的隐私,并培训同伴辅导员如何在网上建立信任和融洽的关系。通过限制同伴辅导员的工作量、重质不重量、促进自我、同伴和专业护理以减轻压力和职业倦怠,以及为同伴辅导员提供支持性监督和培训,并倡导同伴辅导员团队成为 ED 环境中的平等合作伙伴,可以提高同伴辅导员的健康水平和服务质量。为促进同伴康复项目的采用和持续发展,项目管理人员应与当地社区和项目支持者合作,寻求不同的资金来源,并倡导结构性改革,以适应同伴康复教练的招募和保留。这些建议适用于 PRC 项目的规划者、管理者和拥护者、医院领导层以及领导 SUD 流行病应对工作的州和地方公共卫生机构。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Journal of substance use and addiction treatment
Journal of substance use and addiction treatment Biological Psychiatry, Neuroscience (General), Psychiatry and Mental Health, Psychology (General)
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Parent SMART: Effects of residential treatment and an adjunctive parenting intervention on behavioral health services utilization. “Yeah, this is not going to work for me”–The impact of federal policy restrictions on methadone continuation upon release from jail or prison A community-academic partnership to develop an implementation support package for overdose prevention in permanent supportive housing Factors affecting problem-solving court team decisions about medications for opioid use disorder Is naloxone where it needs to be? Using spatial analytics to examine equitable distribution of community-based naloxone sites
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1