Does immunohistochemical staining predict mobilization success in multiple myeloma patients?

IF 1.4 4区 医学 Q4 HEMATOLOGY Transfusion and Apheresis Science Pub Date : 2024-09-15 DOI:10.1016/j.transci.2024.104004
Fatma Keklik Karadag , Murat Aysin , Nur Soyer , Ajda Güneş , Denis Bozer , Derya Demir , Aysenur Arslan , Fahri Sahin , Mahmut Töbü , Guray Saydam , Filiz Vural
{"title":"Does immunohistochemical staining predict mobilization success in multiple myeloma patients?","authors":"Fatma Keklik Karadag ,&nbsp;Murat Aysin ,&nbsp;Nur Soyer ,&nbsp;Ajda Güneş ,&nbsp;Denis Bozer ,&nbsp;Derya Demir ,&nbsp;Aysenur Arslan ,&nbsp;Fahri Sahin ,&nbsp;Mahmut Töbü ,&nbsp;Guray Saydam ,&nbsp;Filiz Vural","doi":"10.1016/j.transci.2024.104004","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Background</h3><p>So many risk factors for mobilization failure have been described so far. We aimed to identify the risk factors and search the possible effects of bone marrow fibrosis (BMF), CD56, c-myc, and cyclinD1 expression on mobilization.</p></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><p>We evaluated 189 patients with MM who were admitted for stem cell mobilization before autologous stem cell transplantation (ASCT) between 2015 and June 2021. Clinical, laboratory, treatment features, and survival outcomes were compared in patients who were successfully mobilized and who were not.</p></div><div><h3>Results</h3><p>Mobilization failure rate was 11.1 % (21) in our study group. Male gender, mobilization with only G-CSF, history of previous ASCT, lenalidomide exposure, and 2 lines of chemotherapy before stem cell mobilization were observed more commonly in mobilization failure group. There is no relationship between mobilization failure and BMF, CD56, c-myc, and cyclin D1 expression status in patients who received either only G-CSF or G-CSF+ chemotherapy for mobilization. Overall survival (OS) was not different in groups of patients who were successfully mobilized and who were not. Neutrophil engraftment was faster in patients who were transfused &gt; 5 × 10<sup>6</sup>/kg stem cells (p = 0.015). ECOG performance status (p = 0.004), c-myc expression (p = 0.005), lenalidomide therapy before mobilization (p = 0.032), and mobilization with G-CSF+chemotherapy was found to be predictive factors for OS.</p></div><div><h3>Conclusion</h3><p>Even though we could not find any predictive value of CD56, c-myc, and cyclin D1 expression on mobilization, c-myc was found to be associated with low OS. Further studies with large and homogenous study population would be more informative.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":49422,"journal":{"name":"Transfusion and Apheresis Science","volume":"63 6","pages":"Article 104004"},"PeriodicalIF":1.4000,"publicationDate":"2024-09-15","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Transfusion and Apheresis Science","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1473050224001757","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"HEMATOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background

So many risk factors for mobilization failure have been described so far. We aimed to identify the risk factors and search the possible effects of bone marrow fibrosis (BMF), CD56, c-myc, and cyclinD1 expression on mobilization.

Methods

We evaluated 189 patients with MM who were admitted for stem cell mobilization before autologous stem cell transplantation (ASCT) between 2015 and June 2021. Clinical, laboratory, treatment features, and survival outcomes were compared in patients who were successfully mobilized and who were not.

Results

Mobilization failure rate was 11.1 % (21) in our study group. Male gender, mobilization with only G-CSF, history of previous ASCT, lenalidomide exposure, and 2 lines of chemotherapy before stem cell mobilization were observed more commonly in mobilization failure group. There is no relationship between mobilization failure and BMF, CD56, c-myc, and cyclin D1 expression status in patients who received either only G-CSF or G-CSF+ chemotherapy for mobilization. Overall survival (OS) was not different in groups of patients who were successfully mobilized and who were not. Neutrophil engraftment was faster in patients who were transfused > 5 × 106/kg stem cells (p = 0.015). ECOG performance status (p = 0.004), c-myc expression (p = 0.005), lenalidomide therapy before mobilization (p = 0.032), and mobilization with G-CSF+chemotherapy was found to be predictive factors for OS.

Conclusion

Even though we could not find any predictive value of CD56, c-myc, and cyclin D1 expression on mobilization, c-myc was found to be associated with low OS. Further studies with large and homogenous study population would be more informative.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
免疫组化染色能否预测多发性骨髓瘤患者的转移成功率?
背景迄今为止,动员失败的风险因素有很多。我们旨在确定这些风险因素,并研究骨髓纤维化(BMF)、CD56、c-myc和cyclinD1表达对动员可能产生的影响。方法我们评估了2015年至2021年6月期间入院进行自体干细胞移植(ASCT)前干细胞动员的189名MM患者。结果在我们的研究组中,动员失败率为11.1%(21例)。在动员失败组中,男性、仅使用G-CSF动员、既往ASCT病史、来那度胺暴露和干细胞动员前接受过2次化疗的情况更为常见。在仅接受G-CSF或G-CSF+化疗动员的患者中,动员失败与BMF、CD56、c-myc和细胞周期蛋白D1的表达状态没有关系。成功动员和未成功动员患者的总生存期(OS)没有差异。输注> 5 × 106/kg干细胞的患者中性粒细胞移植速度更快(p = 0.015)。ECOG表现状态(p = 0.004)、c-myc表达(p = 0.005)、动员前来那度胺治疗(p = 0.032)和动员时使用G-CSF+化疗被认为是OS的预测因素。对大量同质研究人群的进一步研究将提供更多信息。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
3.60
自引率
5.30%
发文量
181
审稿时长
42 days
期刊介绍: Transfusion and Apheresis Science brings comprehensive and up-to-date information to physicians and health care professionals involved in the rapidly changing fields of transfusion medicine, hemostasis and apheresis. The journal presents original articles relating to scientific and clinical studies in the areas of immunohematology, transfusion practice, bleeding and thrombotic disorders and both therapeutic and donor apheresis including hematopoietic stem cells. Topics covered include the collection and processing of blood, compatibility testing and guidelines for the use of blood products, as well as screening for and transmission of blood-borne diseases. All areas of apheresis - therapeutic and collection - are also addressed. We would like to specifically encourage allied health professionals in this area to submit manuscripts that relate to improved patient and donor care, technical aspects and educational issues. Transfusion and Apheresis Science features a "Theme" section which includes, in each issue, a group of papers designed to review a specific topic of current importance in transfusion and hemostasis for the discussion of topical issues specific to apheresis and focuses on the operators'' viewpoint. Another section is "What''s Happening" which provides informal reporting of activities in the field. In addition, brief case reports and Letters to the Editor, as well as reviews of meetings and events of general interest, and a listing of recent patents make the journal a complete source of information for practitioners of transfusion, hemostasis and apheresis science. Immediate dissemination of important information is ensured by the commitment of Transfusion and Apheresis Science to rapid publication of both symposia and submitted papers.
期刊最新文献
Mechanistic insights from a pilot exploratory study of the dynamic proteomic changes during plasma exchange in patients with acute liver failure. Editorial commentary: The latest viewpoint on a statistical analysis of total analytical errors in diagnostic tools used for quantitative testing of medical devices in transfusion medicine & insights on the development of autoantibody isotypes to the Annexin A1 protein of the neutrophil in association with COVID-19-induced hyperinflammatory processes Laboratory measurement of autoantibodies to Annexin A1: Review and measurements in health and COVID-19 A non-parametric framework for evaluating total analytical error in in vitro diagnostic medical devices in transfusion medicine International forum: WAA meets in Yogaykarta
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1