High-frequency chest wall oscillation devices: An umbrella review and bibliometric analysis

IF 7 2区 医学 Q1 BIOLOGY Computers in biology and medicine Pub Date : 2024-09-18 DOI:10.1016/j.compbiomed.2024.109135
{"title":"High-frequency chest wall oscillation devices: An umbrella review and bibliometric analysis","authors":"","doi":"10.1016/j.compbiomed.2024.109135","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Introduction</h3><p>High-frequency chest wall oscillation (HFCWO) devices are used to improve airway clearance in various respiratory conditions. This study comprehensively assesses the evidence on efficacy and safety and identifies trends in scientific publications and patents across geographic regions.</p></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><p>This study utilized an integrated approach, combining bibliographic and bibliometric research with artificial intelligence (AI) tools. Four databases – PubMed, Europe Pubmed Central, Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews, and CINAHL – were searched for systematic reviews on the effectiveness of treatment options for HFCWO. The AMSTAR-2 tool was used to evaluate the risk of bias in systematic reviews. Bibliographic research synthesized the evidence following PRISMA and Cochrane guidelines. The Dimensions platform was used for bibliometric analysis to provide insights into the global landscape. AI tools with prompt engineering tools Chain-of-Thoughts (CoT) and Tree of Thoughts (ToT) were used to enhance data extraction capabilities.</p></div><div><h3>Results</h3><p>The umbrella review identified 12 systematic reviews supporting the effectiveness of HFCWO in improving pulmonary function parameters, sputum characteristics, dyspnea, health scores, and quality of life in conditions including cystic fibrosis, bronchiectasis, chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD), or neuromuscular diseases, with varying evidence of certainty. Eight of the twelve reviews had a moderate to high AMSTAR-2 confidence level, while several studies lacked sufficient descriptions of methods, treatment regimens, outcome measures, and adverse effects. Despite the absence of adverse events, the overall evidence quality between studies is evaluated as low to very low. Bibliometric analysis found a significant increase in global interest over the past two decades, with 230 research publications, 137 patents, and 56 clinical trials.</p></div><div><h3>Conclusions</h3><p>The study highlights the potential of HFCWO devices in respiratory care but demands more robust evidence. The increasing interest in airway clearance devices highlights the necessity for HFCWO mechanism and safety research, underlining its therapeutic relevance in respiratory medicine. The interdisciplinary integration of AI tools and prompt engineering contributes to a nuanced understanding of the available evidence.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":10578,"journal":{"name":"Computers in biology and medicine","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":7.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-09-18","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Computers in biology and medicine","FirstCategoryId":"5","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0010482524012204","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"BIOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Introduction

High-frequency chest wall oscillation (HFCWO) devices are used to improve airway clearance in various respiratory conditions. This study comprehensively assesses the evidence on efficacy and safety and identifies trends in scientific publications and patents across geographic regions.

Methods

This study utilized an integrated approach, combining bibliographic and bibliometric research with artificial intelligence (AI) tools. Four databases – PubMed, Europe Pubmed Central, Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews, and CINAHL – were searched for systematic reviews on the effectiveness of treatment options for HFCWO. The AMSTAR-2 tool was used to evaluate the risk of bias in systematic reviews. Bibliographic research synthesized the evidence following PRISMA and Cochrane guidelines. The Dimensions platform was used for bibliometric analysis to provide insights into the global landscape. AI tools with prompt engineering tools Chain-of-Thoughts (CoT) and Tree of Thoughts (ToT) were used to enhance data extraction capabilities.

Results

The umbrella review identified 12 systematic reviews supporting the effectiveness of HFCWO in improving pulmonary function parameters, sputum characteristics, dyspnea, health scores, and quality of life in conditions including cystic fibrosis, bronchiectasis, chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD), or neuromuscular diseases, with varying evidence of certainty. Eight of the twelve reviews had a moderate to high AMSTAR-2 confidence level, while several studies lacked sufficient descriptions of methods, treatment regimens, outcome measures, and adverse effects. Despite the absence of adverse events, the overall evidence quality between studies is evaluated as low to very low. Bibliometric analysis found a significant increase in global interest over the past two decades, with 230 research publications, 137 patents, and 56 clinical trials.

Conclusions

The study highlights the potential of HFCWO devices in respiratory care but demands more robust evidence. The increasing interest in airway clearance devices highlights the necessity for HFCWO mechanism and safety research, underlining its therapeutic relevance in respiratory medicine. The interdisciplinary integration of AI tools and prompt engineering contributes to a nuanced understanding of the available evidence.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
高频胸壁振荡装置:综述和文献计量分析
导言高频胸壁振荡(HFCWO)设备用于改善各种呼吸系统疾病的气道通畅状况。本研究全面评估了有关疗效和安全性的证据,并确定了不同地区科学出版物和专利的趋势。方法本研究采用了一种综合方法,将文献和文献计量学研究与人工智能(AI)工具相结合。在 PubMed、Europe Pubmed Central、Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews 和 CINAHL 四个数据库中检索了有关 HFCWO 治疗方案有效性的系统综述。AMSTAR-2工具用于评估系统性综述的偏倚风险。文献研究按照 PRISMA 和 Cochrane 指南对证据进行了综合。使用 Dimensions 平台进行文献计量分析,以深入了解全球情况。结果总综述确定了 12 篇系统综述,这些综述支持 HFCWO 在改善囊性纤维化、支气管扩张、慢性阻塞性肺病 (COPD) 或神经肌肉疾病的肺功能参数、痰液特征、呼吸困难、健康评分和生活质量方面的有效性,但证据的确定性各不相同。在 12 篇综述中,有 8 篇的 AMSTAR-2 可信度为中度到高度,而有几项研究缺乏对方法、治疗方案、结果测量和不良反应的充分说明。尽管没有不良反应,但研究之间的总体证据质量被评定为低至极低。文献计量分析发现,在过去二十年中,全球对 HFCWO 设备的兴趣显著增加,共发表了 230 篇研究论文、137 项专利和 56 项临床试验。人们对气道通畅设备的兴趣与日俱增,这凸显了 HFCWO 机制和安全性研究的必要性,同时也强调了其在呼吸医学中的治疗意义。人工智能工具和及时工程学的跨学科整合有助于对现有证据进行细致入微的理解。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Computers in biology and medicine
Computers in biology and medicine 工程技术-工程:生物医学
CiteScore
11.70
自引率
10.40%
发文量
1086
审稿时长
74 days
期刊介绍: Computers in Biology and Medicine is an international forum for sharing groundbreaking advancements in the use of computers in bioscience and medicine. This journal serves as a medium for communicating essential research, instruction, ideas, and information regarding the rapidly evolving field of computer applications in these domains. By encouraging the exchange of knowledge, we aim to facilitate progress and innovation in the utilization of computers in biology and medicine.
期刊最新文献
A conflict-free multi-modal fusion network with spatial reinforcement transformers for brain tumor segmentation. Deep learning approaches for automated classification of neonatal lung ultrasound with assessment of human-to-AI interrater agreement. In silico exploration of phytochemicals as inhibitors for acute myeloid leukemia by targeting LIN28A gene: A cheminformatics study. Multi-lesion segmentation guided deep attention network for automated detection of diabetic retinopathy. Simulation of hip bony range of motion (BROM) corresponds to the observed functional range of motion (FROM) for pure flexion, internal rotation in deep flexion, and external rotation in minimal flexion-extension - A cadaver study.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1