The Impact of Location and Asset Type on the Success of Advanced Airway Management in a Critical Care Transport Environment

Q3 Nursing Air Medical Journal Pub Date : 2024-09-01 DOI:10.1016/j.amj.2024.06.001
Winny Li MD , Mahvareh Ahghari , Johannes von Vopelius-Feldt MD, PhD , Brodie Nolan MD, MSc
{"title":"The Impact of Location and Asset Type on the Success of Advanced Airway Management in a Critical Care Transport Environment","authors":"Winny Li MD ,&nbsp;Mahvareh Ahghari ,&nbsp;Johannes von Vopelius-Feldt MD, PhD ,&nbsp;Brodie Nolan MD, MSc","doi":"10.1016/j.amj.2024.06.001","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Objective</h3><p>Advanced airway management (AAM) is a critical component of prehospital critical care. Airway management in flight can be more challenging because of spatial, ergonomic, and environmental factors. This study examines the frequency of in-flight intubation (IFI), first-pass success (FPS) rates, and definitive airway sans hypoxia/hypotension on first attempt (DASH-1A) across different locations of airway management.</p></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><p>We conducted a retrospective database analysis of all patients transported between January 2016 and July 2021 who received AAM from a single air medical service. Patient records were reviewed for location of intubation, patient characteristics, and FPS and DASH-1A rates. The primary outcome was the frequency of IFI. The secondary outcomes included FPS and DASH-1A rates by location and type of transport asset.</p></div><div><h3>Results</h3><p>During the study period, 473 patients required AAM. Three percent (15/473) of patients were intubated in an in-flight setting, 28% (130/473) were intubated on scene, and 70% (328/473) were intubated in a health care facility. The primary reason for IFI was unanticipated cardiac arrest or clinical deterioration. The overall FPS rate was 69% (328/473), and the DASH-1A rate was 49% (194/399). Based on the location of AAM, the FPS and DASH-1A rates were the lowest for on-scene intubations (56% [74/130] and 27% [20/74], respectively). Most of the on-scene AAM took place with rotor wing flight crews.</p></div><div><h3>Conclusion</h3><p>Airway management occurs infrequently in an in-flight setting and is necessary because of patient deterioration or cardiac arrest. Based on our results, we identified opportunities for targeted AAM quality improvement and clinical governance.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":35737,"journal":{"name":"Air Medical Journal","volume":"43 5","pages":"Pages 416-420"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-09-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1067991X24001238/pdfft?md5=bdb08ca83db043757d92ae5f7cda0225&pid=1-s2.0-S1067991X24001238-main.pdf","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Air Medical Journal","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1067991X24001238","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"Nursing","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objective

Advanced airway management (AAM) is a critical component of prehospital critical care. Airway management in flight can be more challenging because of spatial, ergonomic, and environmental factors. This study examines the frequency of in-flight intubation (IFI), first-pass success (FPS) rates, and definitive airway sans hypoxia/hypotension on first attempt (DASH-1A) across different locations of airway management.

Methods

We conducted a retrospective database analysis of all patients transported between January 2016 and July 2021 who received AAM from a single air medical service. Patient records were reviewed for location of intubation, patient characteristics, and FPS and DASH-1A rates. The primary outcome was the frequency of IFI. The secondary outcomes included FPS and DASH-1A rates by location and type of transport asset.

Results

During the study period, 473 patients required AAM. Three percent (15/473) of patients were intubated in an in-flight setting, 28% (130/473) were intubated on scene, and 70% (328/473) were intubated in a health care facility. The primary reason for IFI was unanticipated cardiac arrest or clinical deterioration. The overall FPS rate was 69% (328/473), and the DASH-1A rate was 49% (194/399). Based on the location of AAM, the FPS and DASH-1A rates were the lowest for on-scene intubations (56% [74/130] and 27% [20/74], respectively). Most of the on-scene AAM took place with rotor wing flight crews.

Conclusion

Airway management occurs infrequently in an in-flight setting and is necessary because of patient deterioration or cardiac arrest. Based on our results, we identified opportunities for targeted AAM quality improvement and clinical governance.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
在重症监护运输环境中,位置和资产类型对高级气道管理成功与否的影响
目标高级气道管理(AAM)是院前重症监护的重要组成部分。由于空间、人体工程学和环境因素的影响,飞行中的气道管理可能更具挑战性。本研究探讨了不同气道管理地点的飞行中插管(IFI)频率、首次插管成功率(FPS)和首次尝试无缺氧/低血压气道(DASH-1A)的确定性。方法我们对 2016 年 1 月至 2021 年 7 月间转运的所有患者进行了回顾性数据库分析,这些患者均接受了单一空中医疗服务机构的气道管理。我们查阅了患者记录,以了解插管地点、患者特征、FPS 和 DASH-1A 率。主要结果是 IFI 的频率。次要结果包括按地点和运输工具类型划分的 FPS 和 DASH-1A 率。3%的患者(15/473)是在机上插管,28%的患者(130/473)是在现场插管,70%的患者(328/473)是在医疗机构插管。IFI 的主要原因是意外的心脏骤停或临床恶化。总的 FPS 率为 69%(328/473),DASH-1A 率为 49%(194/399)。根据 AAM 的位置,现场插管的 FPS 和 DASH-1A 率最低(分别为 56% [74/130] 和 27% [20/74])。结论气道管理在飞行环境中并不常见,但由于患者病情恶化或心脏骤停,有必要进行气道管理。根据我们的研究结果,我们发现了有针对性地改进气道管理质量和临床管理的机会。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Air Medical Journal
Air Medical Journal Nursing-Emergency Nursing
CiteScore
1.20
自引率
0.00%
发文量
112
审稿时长
69 days
期刊介绍: Air Medical Journal is the official journal of the five leading air medical transport associations in the United States. AMJ is the premier provider of information for the medical transport industry, addressing the unique concerns of medical transport physicians, nurses, pilots, paramedics, emergency medical technicians, communication specialists, and program administrators. The journal contains practical how-to articles, debates on controversial industry issues, legislative updates, case studies, and peer-reviewed original research articles covering all aspects of the medical transport profession.
期刊最新文献
Table of Contents Editorial Board Psychomotor Vigilance Testing on Neonatal Transport: A Western Australian Experience Pericardiocentesis During Transport for Cardiac Tamponade Complicating Acute Type A Aortic Dissection Recent Outcomes Research in Helicopter Emergency Medical Services: A Scoping Review of Publication Year 2023 Additions to the Helicopter Outcomes Assessment Research Database
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1