Reliability-driven large group consensus decision-making method with hesitant fuzzy linguistic information for the selection of hydrogen storage technology

IF 8.1 1区 计算机科学 0 COMPUTER SCIENCE, INFORMATION SYSTEMS Information Sciences Pub Date : 2024-09-12 DOI:10.1016/j.ins.2024.121457
{"title":"Reliability-driven large group consensus decision-making method with hesitant fuzzy linguistic information for the selection of hydrogen storage technology","authors":"","doi":"10.1016/j.ins.2024.121457","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>The use of hydrogen storage technology (HST) as a bridge for producing and utilizing hydrogen energy in the hydrogen industry chain is significant, and its evaluation has attracted the interest of researchers. Since there are different types of HSTs, selecting the most appropriate one requires the participation of plenty of experts with different professional backgrounds, which makes this be modeled as a large group decision-making problem. This paper develops a reliability-driven large group consensus decision-making (LGCDM) method for HST selection using the hesitant fuzzy linguistic terms set (HFLTS) as the evaluation representation format. Specifically, the expertise level of individuals and the reliability of group opinions are measured based on the set variables, and then the dimensionality of large groups is reduced based on the reliability of subgroup opinions. Furthermore, an opinion reliability rating mechanism is designed and, when consensus is not satisfactory, a feedback recommendation mechanism and consensus optimization mechanism are developed for implementation. Finally, the proposed reliability-driven LGCDM approach is applied to the HST selection for THVOW Company, and the comparison with existent related approaches indicates that it not only is practical and reasonable, but also provides a technical path for relevant departments to make decisions on practical issues.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":51063,"journal":{"name":"Information Sciences","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":8.1000,"publicationDate":"2024-09-12","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Information Sciences","FirstCategoryId":"94","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0020025524013719","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"计算机科学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"0","JCRName":"COMPUTER SCIENCE, INFORMATION SYSTEMS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

The use of hydrogen storage technology (HST) as a bridge for producing and utilizing hydrogen energy in the hydrogen industry chain is significant, and its evaluation has attracted the interest of researchers. Since there are different types of HSTs, selecting the most appropriate one requires the participation of plenty of experts with different professional backgrounds, which makes this be modeled as a large group decision-making problem. This paper develops a reliability-driven large group consensus decision-making (LGCDM) method for HST selection using the hesitant fuzzy linguistic terms set (HFLTS) as the evaluation representation format. Specifically, the expertise level of individuals and the reliability of group opinions are measured based on the set variables, and then the dimensionality of large groups is reduced based on the reliability of subgroup opinions. Furthermore, an opinion reliability rating mechanism is designed and, when consensus is not satisfactory, a feedback recommendation mechanism and consensus optimization mechanism are developed for implementation. Finally, the proposed reliability-driven LGCDM approach is applied to the HST selection for THVOW Company, and the comparison with existent related approaches indicates that it not only is practical and reasonable, but also provides a technical path for relevant departments to make decisions on practical issues.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
利用犹豫不决的模糊语言信息选择储氢技术的可靠性驱动型大组共识决策方法
在氢能产业链中,利用氢储存技术(HST)作为生产和利用氢能的桥梁意义重大,其评估也引起了研究人员的兴趣。由于储氢技术有多种类型,选择最合适的储氢技术需要大量具有不同专业背景的专家参与,这就使其成为一个大型群体决策问题。本文使用犹豫模糊语言术语集(HFLTS)作为评估表示格式,开发了一种可靠性驱动的大型群体一致决策(LGCDM)方法,用于选择 HST。具体来说,根据集合变量来衡量个人的专业知识水平和群体意见的可靠性,然后根据子群体意见的可靠性来降低大群体的维度。此外,还设计了一种意见可靠性评级机制,当共识不理想时,还开发了反馈建议机制和共识优化机制,以便实施。最后,将所提出的可靠性驱动的 LGCDM 方法应用于 THVOW 公司的 HST 选择,并与现有相关方法进行了比较,结果表明该方法不仅实用合理,而且为相关部门在实际问题上的决策提供了技术路径。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Information Sciences
Information Sciences 工程技术-计算机:信息系统
CiteScore
14.00
自引率
17.30%
发文量
1322
审稿时长
10.4 months
期刊介绍: Informatics and Computer Science Intelligent Systems Applications is an esteemed international journal that focuses on publishing original and creative research findings in the field of information sciences. We also feature a limited number of timely tutorial and surveying contributions. Our journal aims to cater to a diverse audience, including researchers, developers, managers, strategic planners, graduate students, and anyone interested in staying up-to-date with cutting-edge research in information science, knowledge engineering, and intelligent systems. While readers are expected to share a common interest in information science, they come from varying backgrounds such as engineering, mathematics, statistics, physics, computer science, cell biology, molecular biology, management science, cognitive science, neurobiology, behavioral sciences, and biochemistry.
期刊最新文献
Wavelet structure-texture-aware super-resolution for pedestrian detection HVASR: Enhancing 360-degree video delivery with viewport-aware super resolution KNEG-CL: Unveiling data patterns using a k-nearest neighbor evolutionary graph for efficient clustering Fréchet and Gateaux gH-differentiability for interval valued functions of multiple variables Detecting fuzzy-rough conditional anomalies
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1