Is the clique a pond? The big-fish-little-pond effect and the relative meaning of clique and classroom

IF 4.7 1区 教育学 Q1 EDUCATION & EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH Learning and Instruction Pub Date : 2024-09-18 DOI:10.1016/j.learninstruc.2024.101997
{"title":"Is the clique a pond? The big-fish-little-pond effect and the relative meaning of clique and classroom","authors":"","doi":"10.1016/j.learninstruc.2024.101997","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Background</h3><p>Academic self-concept (ASC) is a key predictor of learning behaviors and educational outcomes. In adolescence, the evaluation of academic abilities is mainly shaped by the social environment and comparisons with various reference groups. The effect of making social comparisons with the academic achievement of a reference group is known as the big-fish-little-pond effect (BFLPE).</p></div><div><h3>Aims</h3><p>Based on social comparison theory and the local dominance effect (LDE), the present study aimed to investigate a pivotal adolescent reference group beside the classroom: the clique. We investigated to what extent students’ social comparison with the mathematics achievement of clique members was related to the ASC of individual students more than general classroom comparisons.</p></div><div><h3>Sample</h3><p>The sample comprised 743 German secondary students in sixth and eighth grade (93 cliques in 40 classrooms).</p></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><p>We estimated a three-level structural equation model using data from a two-wave longitudinal study in one school year. The change in students’ ASC was determined using latent change modeling.</p></div><div><h3>Results</h3><p>The average academic achievement of the clique negatively predicted ASC development. Classroom academic achievement had no effect.</p></div><div><h3>Conclusions</h3><p>The results underline the importance of informal peer groups like cliques as important reference groups for social comparisons and ASC development during adolescence.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":48357,"journal":{"name":"Learning and Instruction","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":4.7000,"publicationDate":"2024-09-18","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0959475224001245/pdfft?md5=50667f0aec5097d3514cc2f818765c29&pid=1-s2.0-S0959475224001245-main.pdf","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Learning and Instruction","FirstCategoryId":"95","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0959475224001245","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"教育学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"EDUCATION & EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background

Academic self-concept (ASC) is a key predictor of learning behaviors and educational outcomes. In adolescence, the evaluation of academic abilities is mainly shaped by the social environment and comparisons with various reference groups. The effect of making social comparisons with the academic achievement of a reference group is known as the big-fish-little-pond effect (BFLPE).

Aims

Based on social comparison theory and the local dominance effect (LDE), the present study aimed to investigate a pivotal adolescent reference group beside the classroom: the clique. We investigated to what extent students’ social comparison with the mathematics achievement of clique members was related to the ASC of individual students more than general classroom comparisons.

Sample

The sample comprised 743 German secondary students in sixth and eighth grade (93 cliques in 40 classrooms).

Methods

We estimated a three-level structural equation model using data from a two-wave longitudinal study in one school year. The change in students’ ASC was determined using latent change modeling.

Results

The average academic achievement of the clique negatively predicted ASC development. Classroom academic achievement had no effect.

Conclusions

The results underline the importance of informal peer groups like cliques as important reference groups for social comparisons and ASC development during adolescence.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
小团体是池塘吗?大鱼小池效应以及小团体和教室的相对意义
背景学业自我概念(ASC)是预测学习行为和教育成果的关键因素。在青少年时期,对学习能力的评价主要受社会环境和与不同参照群体比较的影响。本研究以社会比较理论和局部优势效应(LDE)为基础,旨在调查班级中一个重要的青少年参照群体:小团体。我们研究了学生对小团体成员数学成绩的社会比较在多大程度上比一般的课堂比较更能影响学生个体的 ASC。方法我们利用一学年两波纵向研究的数据估算了一个三级结构方程模型。结果小团体的平均学业成绩对 ASC 的发展有负面影响。结论研究结果表明,像小团体这样的非正式同伴群体是青春期社会比较和ASC发展的重要参照群体。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
11.30
自引率
4.80%
发文量
109
期刊介绍: As an international, multi-disciplinary, peer-refereed journal, Learning and Instruction provides a platform for the publication of the most advanced scientific research in the areas of learning, development, instruction and teaching. The journal welcomes original empirical investigations. The papers may represent a variety of theoretical perspectives and different methodological approaches. They may refer to any age level, from infants to adults and to a diversity of learning and instructional settings, from laboratory experiments to field studies. The major criteria in the review and the selection process concern the significance of the contribution to the area of learning and instruction, and the rigor of the study.
期刊最新文献
Nine partner languages, one path: Minority language reading proficiency development among German two-way immersion students Effects of SI-PASS on a high-risk course – A randomized controlled trial Context counts: Unveiling the impact of achievement level on teachers’ text assessment How to teach Bayesian reasoning: An empirical study comparing four different probability training courses Understanding teacher judgments of student motivation: The role of (un-)available cues
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1