Mobile mental health application use, and app feature preferences among individuals with mental disorders in Ethiopia: A cross-sectional survey

IF 3.7 2区 医学 Q2 COMPUTER SCIENCE, INFORMATION SYSTEMS International Journal of Medical Informatics Pub Date : 2024-09-14 DOI:10.1016/j.ijmedinf.2024.105628
{"title":"Mobile mental health application use, and app feature preferences among individuals with mental disorders in Ethiopia: A cross-sectional survey","authors":"","doi":"10.1016/j.ijmedinf.2024.105628","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Background</h3><p>Mobile health applications have been shown to assist in the treatment of mental illnesses, yet their potential remains underutilized. As supportive care, mental health applications use may be useful tools in improving mental health literacy and treatment outcomes, but patients’ use of and interest in using these apps have not been studied in low-income countries like Ethiopia. This study explores the determinants of patients’ mental health app use interests and app feature preferences.</p></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><p>A cross-sectional study was conducted with 419 outpatient individuals with mental health disorders at Amanuel Mental Specialized Hospital, Ethiopia, between October and November 2023, using a convenience sampling method. Patients’ self-reported mental health app use, interests, attitudes, and app feature preferences were collected. A multivariate logistic regression model was used to identify the associated factors.</p></div><div><h3>Results</h3><p>Overall prevalence of not interested, somewhat interested, interested, and extremely interested in mental health app use was 5.3 %, 16.9 %, 27.7 %, and 50.1 % respectively. The proportion of current mental health apps use was low (21.2 %). Current mental health app use is associated with living in an urban area (AOR = 6.69, CI: 3.19–14) and having a higher education level (4.12 (2.02–8.04). Furthermore, app features such as psychoeducation, symptom tracking, and self-management techniques ranked as the most preferred app features.</p></div><div><h3>Conclusions</h3><p>Most study participants were interested in using mental health apps, but only about one in four were using mental health apps. This suggests promise for their utility in the Ethiopian context. App developers and policymakers should consider rural residents’, lower educational levels, and patient app preferences when developing these applications.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":54950,"journal":{"name":"International Journal of Medical Informatics","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":3.7000,"publicationDate":"2024-09-14","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1386505624002910/pdfft?md5=3e024e419cb7a866fad10181cc39ac0a&pid=1-s2.0-S1386505624002910-main.pdf","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"International Journal of Medical Informatics","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1386505624002910","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"COMPUTER SCIENCE, INFORMATION SYSTEMS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background

Mobile health applications have been shown to assist in the treatment of mental illnesses, yet their potential remains underutilized. As supportive care, mental health applications use may be useful tools in improving mental health literacy and treatment outcomes, but patients’ use of and interest in using these apps have not been studied in low-income countries like Ethiopia. This study explores the determinants of patients’ mental health app use interests and app feature preferences.

Methods

A cross-sectional study was conducted with 419 outpatient individuals with mental health disorders at Amanuel Mental Specialized Hospital, Ethiopia, between October and November 2023, using a convenience sampling method. Patients’ self-reported mental health app use, interests, attitudes, and app feature preferences were collected. A multivariate logistic regression model was used to identify the associated factors.

Results

Overall prevalence of not interested, somewhat interested, interested, and extremely interested in mental health app use was 5.3 %, 16.9 %, 27.7 %, and 50.1 % respectively. The proportion of current mental health apps use was low (21.2 %). Current mental health app use is associated with living in an urban area (AOR = 6.69, CI: 3.19–14) and having a higher education level (4.12 (2.02–8.04). Furthermore, app features such as psychoeducation, symptom tracking, and self-management techniques ranked as the most preferred app features.

Conclusions

Most study participants were interested in using mental health apps, but only about one in four were using mental health apps. This suggests promise for their utility in the Ethiopian context. App developers and policymakers should consider rural residents’, lower educational levels, and patient app preferences when developing these applications.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
埃塞俄比亚精神障碍患者对移动精神健康应用程序的使用情况和应用程序功能的偏好:横断面调查
背景移动医疗应用程序已被证明有助于治疗精神疾病,但其潜力仍未得到充分利用。作为支持性护理,心理健康应用程序可能是提高心理健康知识水平和治疗效果的有用工具,但在埃塞俄比亚等低收入国家,尚未对患者使用这些应用程序的情况和兴趣进行研究。本研究探讨了患者使用心理健康应用程序的兴趣和应用程序功能偏好的决定因素。方法在 2023 年 10 月至 11 月期间,采用方便抽样法对埃塞俄比亚 Amanuel 精神专科医院的 419 名精神疾病门诊患者进行了横断面研究。研究收集了患者自我报告的心理健康应用程序使用情况、兴趣、态度和应用程序功能偏好。结果对使用心理健康应用程序不感兴趣、有点感兴趣、感兴趣和非常感兴趣的总体比例分别为 5.3%、16.9%、27.7% 和 50.1%。目前使用心理健康应用程序的比例较低(21.2%)。当前心理健康应用程序的使用与居住在城市地区(AOR = 6.69,CI:3.19-14)和教育程度较高(4.12(2.02-8.04))有关。此外,心理教育、症状跟踪和自我管理技巧等应用程序功能也是最受青睐的应用程序功能。结论大多数研究参与者都有兴趣使用心理健康应用程序,但只有约四分之一的人在使用心理健康应用程序。这表明它们在埃塞俄比亚的应用前景广阔。应用程序开发人员和政策制定者在开发这些应用程序时应考虑到农村居民、较低的教育水平和患者对应用程序的偏好。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
International Journal of Medical Informatics
International Journal of Medical Informatics 医学-计算机:信息系统
CiteScore
8.90
自引率
4.10%
发文量
217
审稿时长
42 days
期刊介绍: International Journal of Medical Informatics provides an international medium for dissemination of original results and interpretative reviews concerning the field of medical informatics. The Journal emphasizes the evaluation of systems in healthcare settings. The scope of journal covers: Information systems, including national or international registration systems, hospital information systems, departmental and/or physician''s office systems, document handling systems, electronic medical record systems, standardization, systems integration etc.; Computer-aided medical decision support systems using heuristic, algorithmic and/or statistical methods as exemplified in decision theory, protocol development, artificial intelligence, etc. Educational computer based programs pertaining to medical informatics or medicine in general; Organizational, economic, social, clinical impact, ethical and cost-benefit aspects of IT applications in health care.
期刊最新文献
Application of the openEHR reference model for PGHD: A case study on the DH-Convener initiative Tracking provenance in clinical data warehouses for quality management Acute myocardial infarction risk prediction in emergency chest pain patients: An external validation study Healthcare professionals’ cross-organizational access to electronic health records: A scoping review Cross-modal similar clinical case retrieval using a modular model based on contrastive learning and k-nearest neighbor search
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1