Relating pronunciation distance metrics to intelligibility across English accents

IF 1.9 1区 文学 0 LANGUAGE & LINGUISTICS Journal of Phonetics Pub Date : 2024-09-17 DOI:10.1016/j.wocn.2024.101357
{"title":"Relating pronunciation distance metrics to intelligibility across English accents","authors":"","doi":"10.1016/j.wocn.2024.101357","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>Unfamiliar accents can cause word recognition challenges, particularly in noisy environments, but few studies have incorporated quantitative pronunciation distance metrics to explain intelligibility differences across accents. To address this gap, intelligibility was measured for 18 talkers -- two from each of three first-language, one bilingual, and five second-language accents -- in quiet and two noise conditions. The relations between two edit distance metrics, which quantify phonetic differences from a reference accent, and intelligibility scores were assessed. Intelligibility was quantified through both fuzzy string matching and percent words correct. Both edit distance metrics were significantly related to intelligibility scores; a heuristic edit distance metric was the best predictor of intelligibility for both scoring methods. Further, there were stronger effects of edit distance as the listening condition increased in difficulty. Talker accent also contributed substantially to intelligibility models, but relations between accent and edit distance did not consistently pattern for the two talkers representing each accent. Frequency of production differences in vowels and consonants was negatively correlated with intelligibility, particularly for consonants. Together, these results suggest that significant amounts of variability in intelligibility across accents can be predicted by phonetic differences from the listener’s home accent. However, talker- and accent-specific pronunciation features, including suprasegmental characteristics, must be quantified to fully explain intelligibility across talkers and listening conditions.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":51397,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Phonetics","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":1.9000,"publicationDate":"2024-09-17","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0095447024000639/pdfft?md5=8f68608c6b33b9f8c629933aabc9e62b&pid=1-s2.0-S0095447024000639-main.pdf","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Phonetics","FirstCategoryId":"98","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0095447024000639","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"文学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"0","JCRName":"LANGUAGE & LINGUISTICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Unfamiliar accents can cause word recognition challenges, particularly in noisy environments, but few studies have incorporated quantitative pronunciation distance metrics to explain intelligibility differences across accents. To address this gap, intelligibility was measured for 18 talkers -- two from each of three first-language, one bilingual, and five second-language accents -- in quiet and two noise conditions. The relations between two edit distance metrics, which quantify phonetic differences from a reference accent, and intelligibility scores were assessed. Intelligibility was quantified through both fuzzy string matching and percent words correct. Both edit distance metrics were significantly related to intelligibility scores; a heuristic edit distance metric was the best predictor of intelligibility for both scoring methods. Further, there were stronger effects of edit distance as the listening condition increased in difficulty. Talker accent also contributed substantially to intelligibility models, but relations between accent and edit distance did not consistently pattern for the two talkers representing each accent. Frequency of production differences in vowels and consonants was negatively correlated with intelligibility, particularly for consonants. Together, these results suggest that significant amounts of variability in intelligibility across accents can be predicted by phonetic differences from the listener’s home accent. However, talker- and accent-specific pronunciation features, including suprasegmental characteristics, must be quantified to fully explain intelligibility across talkers and listening conditions.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
将发音距离指标与不同英语口音的可懂度联系起来
不熟悉的口音会给单词识别带来困难,尤其是在嘈杂的环境中,但很少有研究采用定量发音距离指标来解释不同口音之间的可懂度差异。为了弥补这一不足,研究人员在安静和噪音两种环境下测量了 18 位说话者的可懂度,其中三种第一语言口音、一种双语口音和五种第二语言口音各占两位。两个编辑距离指标量化了与参考口音的语音差异,评估了这两个指标与可懂度得分之间的关系。可懂度通过模糊字符串匹配和单词正确率进行量化。两种编辑距离指标都与可懂度得分有显著关系;启发式编辑距离指标是两种评分方法中预测可懂度的最佳指标。此外,随着听力条件难度的增加,编辑距离的影响也越来越大。说话者的口音对可懂度模型也有很大影响,但口音和编辑距离之间的关系在代表每种口音的两个说话者身上并没有一致的模式。元音和辅音的发音差异频率与可懂度呈负相关,尤其是辅音。总之,这些结果表明,不同口音之间的可懂度差异可以通过听者家乡口音的语音差异来预测。然而,要全面解释不同说话者和听力条件下的可懂度,还必须量化说话者和口音的特定发音特征,包括超音段特征。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
3.50
自引率
26.30%
发文量
49
期刊介绍: The Journal of Phonetics publishes papers of an experimental or theoretical nature that deal with phonetic aspects of language and linguistic communication processes. Papers dealing with technological and/or pathological topics, or papers of an interdisciplinary nature are also suitable, provided that linguistic-phonetic principles underlie the work reported. Regular articles, review articles, and letters to the editor are published. Themed issues are also published, devoted entirely to a specific subject of interest within the field of phonetics.
期刊最新文献
Language-specific and individual variation in anticipatory nasal coarticulation: A comparative study of American English, French, and German Towards a dynamical model of English vowels. Evidence from diphthongisation Code-switching experience as a mitigating factor for cross-linguistic phonetic interference Relating pronunciation distance metrics to intelligibility across English accents The relation between perceptual retuning and articulatory restructuring: Individual differences in accommodating a novel phonetic variant
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1