German mHealth App Usability Questionnaire (G-MAUQ) and short version (G-MAUQ-S): Translation and validation study

Q2 Health Professions Smart Health Pub Date : 2024-09-17 DOI:10.1016/j.smhl.2024.100517
Marvin Kopka , Anna Slagman , Claudia Schorr , Henning Krampe , Maria Altendorf , Felix Balzer , Myrto Bolanaki , Doreen Kuschick , Martin Möckel , Hendrik Napierala , Lennart Scatturin , Konrad Schmidt , Alica Thissen , Malte L. Schmieding
{"title":"German mHealth App Usability Questionnaire (G-MAUQ) and short version (G-MAUQ-S): Translation and validation study","authors":"Marvin Kopka ,&nbsp;Anna Slagman ,&nbsp;Claudia Schorr ,&nbsp;Henning Krampe ,&nbsp;Maria Altendorf ,&nbsp;Felix Balzer ,&nbsp;Myrto Bolanaki ,&nbsp;Doreen Kuschick ,&nbsp;Martin Möckel ,&nbsp;Hendrik Napierala ,&nbsp;Lennart Scatturin ,&nbsp;Konrad Schmidt ,&nbsp;Alica Thissen ,&nbsp;Malte L. Schmieding","doi":"10.1016/j.smhl.2024.100517","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Background</h3><p>The use of mobile health applications is increasingly common among the general public and in healthcare systems. With such apps percolating into the classic healthcare sector, the necessity of sound and standardized evaluation grows. The mHealth App Usability Questionnaire (MAUQ) provides a novel and custom-tailored psychometrically validated instrument to capture users’ perception of the usefulness and usability of an mHealth application. So far, this questionnaire is only available in English, Malay and Chinese. The aim of this study was to translate and validate a German version of the MAUQ (G-MAUQ). Further, we developed a short scale with 6 items (G-MAUQ-S) in German.</p></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><p>We used the Translation, Review, Adjudication, Pretest and Documentation (TRAPD) method to translate the MAUQ. Subsequently, we assessed content validity with 15 expert ratings and face validity with 15 German speaking mHealth users. To further validate the questionnaire, we used data from 148 participants of an RCT examining symptom checkers in the Emergency Department to assess convergent validity by correlating the G-MAUQ with the German version of the System Usability Scale and discriminant validity by correlating the G-MAUQ with other unrelated questionnaires. Lastly, we developed a short version by assessing item discrimination, factor loadings, correlation with the full scale and construct validity.</p></div><div><h3>Results</h3><p>All but one item showed sufficient content validity with item-level content validity index values between CVI-I = 0.8 and 1.0. Face validity was excellent with item-level face validity index values ranging from FVI-I = 0.87 to 1. Convergent validity was sufficient with r = 0.769, and discriminant validity was sufficient with values between r = −0.014 and r = 0.220. An internal consistency of Cronbach's α = 0.93 demonstrated high reliability. The short scale showed sufficient convergent validity (r = 0.762) and discriminant validity (r between −0.012 and 0.201).</p></div><div><h3>Conclusions</h3><p>A validated and reliable G-MAUQ can be used by researchers and practitioners to assess the usability of mHealth interventions. We also provide the German mHealth App Usability Questionnaire – Short Version (G-MAUQ-S) with six questions to quickly assess the usability of an intervention.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":37151,"journal":{"name":"Smart Health","volume":"34 ","pages":"Article 100517"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-09-17","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2352648324000734/pdfft?md5=695393762eb37c368501d137f28a9fa2&pid=1-s2.0-S2352648324000734-main.pdf","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Smart Health","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2352648324000734","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"Health Professions","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background

The use of mobile health applications is increasingly common among the general public and in healthcare systems. With such apps percolating into the classic healthcare sector, the necessity of sound and standardized evaluation grows. The mHealth App Usability Questionnaire (MAUQ) provides a novel and custom-tailored psychometrically validated instrument to capture users’ perception of the usefulness and usability of an mHealth application. So far, this questionnaire is only available in English, Malay and Chinese. The aim of this study was to translate and validate a German version of the MAUQ (G-MAUQ). Further, we developed a short scale with 6 items (G-MAUQ-S) in German.

Methods

We used the Translation, Review, Adjudication, Pretest and Documentation (TRAPD) method to translate the MAUQ. Subsequently, we assessed content validity with 15 expert ratings and face validity with 15 German speaking mHealth users. To further validate the questionnaire, we used data from 148 participants of an RCT examining symptom checkers in the Emergency Department to assess convergent validity by correlating the G-MAUQ with the German version of the System Usability Scale and discriminant validity by correlating the G-MAUQ with other unrelated questionnaires. Lastly, we developed a short version by assessing item discrimination, factor loadings, correlation with the full scale and construct validity.

Results

All but one item showed sufficient content validity with item-level content validity index values between CVI-I = 0.8 and 1.0. Face validity was excellent with item-level face validity index values ranging from FVI-I = 0.87 to 1. Convergent validity was sufficient with r = 0.769, and discriminant validity was sufficient with values between r = −0.014 and r = 0.220. An internal consistency of Cronbach's α = 0.93 demonstrated high reliability. The short scale showed sufficient convergent validity (r = 0.762) and discriminant validity (r between −0.012 and 0.201).

Conclusions

A validated and reliable G-MAUQ can be used by researchers and practitioners to assess the usability of mHealth interventions. We also provide the German mHealth App Usability Questionnaire – Short Version (G-MAUQ-S) with six questions to quickly assess the usability of an intervention.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
德国移动医疗应用程序可用性问卷(G-MAUQ)和简版(G-MAUQ-S):翻译和验证研究
背景移动医疗应用程序在公众和医疗系统中的使用越来越普遍。随着此类应用程序逐渐渗入传统的医疗保健领域,对其进行完善和标准化评估的必要性与日俱增。移动医疗应用程序可用性问卷(MAUQ)提供了一种新颖的、经过心理测量验证的定制工具,用于获取用户对移动医疗应用程序有用性和可用性的感知。迄今为止,该问卷仅有英文、马来文和中文版。本研究旨在翻译并验证德文版的 MAUQ(G-MAUQ)。此外,我们还开发了一个包含 6 个项目的德文简易量表(G-MAUQ-S)。方法我们采用了翻译、审阅、裁定、预试和记录(TRAPD)的方法来翻译 MAUQ。随后,我们对 15 位专家的评分进行了内容效度评估,并对 15 位讲德语的移动医疗用户进行了面效度评估。为了进一步验证问卷,我们使用了一项研究调查的 148 名参与者的数据,该研究调查了急诊科的症状检查器,通过将 G-MAUQ 与德文版系统可用性量表相关联来评估收敛效度,并通过将 G-MAUQ 与其他无关问卷相关联来评估判别效度。最后,我们通过评估项目区分度、因子载荷、与全量表的相关性和建构效度,开发了一个简短版本。结果 除一个项目外,其他所有项目都显示出充分的内容效度,项目级内容效度指数值在 CVI-I = 0.8 和 1.0 之间。表面效度非常好,项目层面的表面效度指数值在 FVI-I = 0.87 到 1 之间。收敛效度充足,r = 0.769,判别效度充足,r = -0.014 至 r = 0.220。内部一致性为 Cronbach's α = 0.93,显示了较高的可靠性。短量表显示了充分的收敛效度(r = 0.762)和区分效度(r 值介于 -0.012 和 0.201 之间)。我们还提供了包含六个问题的德国移动医疗应用程序可用性问卷--简版(G-MAUQ-S),用于快速评估干预措施的可用性。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Smart Health
Smart Health Computer Science-Computer Science Applications
CiteScore
6.50
自引率
0.00%
发文量
81
期刊最新文献
Editorial Board Smart health practices: Strategies to improve healthcare efficiency through digital twin technology Human knowledge-based artificial intelligence methods for skin cancer management: Accuracy and interpretability study SAFE: Sound Analysis for Fall Event detection using machine learning Latent Space Representation of Adversarial AutoEncoder for Human Activity Recognition: Application to a low-cost commercial force plate and inertial measurement units
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1