Psychometric Testing of NASA-TLX to Measure Learners’ Cognitive Load in Individual and Group Nursing Simulations

IF 3.4 3区 医学 Q1 NURSING Clinical Simulation in Nursing Pub Date : 2024-09-17 DOI:10.1016/j.ecns.2024.101607
{"title":"Psychometric Testing of NASA-TLX to Measure Learners’ Cognitive Load in Individual and Group Nursing Simulations","authors":"","doi":"10.1016/j.ecns.2024.101607","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Background</h3><p>The National Aeronautics and Space Administration-Task Load Index (NASATLX) is a subjective instrument for measuring cognitive load. Originally designed for aviation, it has proven a valid and reliable instrument across disciplines. Despite extensive use, its ability to measure cognitive load in group and individual nursing simulation has yet to be explored.</p></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><p>This secondary analysis investigates NASA-TLX psychometric properties among 488 surveys completed by learners from a Bachelor's nursing program during individual and group simulation. Psychometric tests included item analysis, Cronbach's alpha, inter-item correlations, and exploratory factor analysis.</p></div><div><h3>Results</h3><p>NASA-TLX demonstrated acceptable reliability and validity in individual simulation; however, there was less reliability in group simulations.</p></div><div><h3>Conclusion</h3><p>Administration variances across individual and group simulation impact NASATLX validity and reliability.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":48753,"journal":{"name":"Clinical Simulation in Nursing","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":3.4000,"publicationDate":"2024-09-17","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Clinical Simulation in Nursing","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1876139924000999","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"NURSING","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background

The National Aeronautics and Space Administration-Task Load Index (NASATLX) is a subjective instrument for measuring cognitive load. Originally designed for aviation, it has proven a valid and reliable instrument across disciplines. Despite extensive use, its ability to measure cognitive load in group and individual nursing simulation has yet to be explored.

Methods

This secondary analysis investigates NASA-TLX psychometric properties among 488 surveys completed by learners from a Bachelor's nursing program during individual and group simulation. Psychometric tests included item analysis, Cronbach's alpha, inter-item correlations, and exploratory factor analysis.

Results

NASA-TLX demonstrated acceptable reliability and validity in individual simulation; however, there was less reliability in group simulations.

Conclusion

Administration variances across individual and group simulation impact NASATLX validity and reliability.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
对 NASA-TLX 进行心理测试,以测量学习者在个人和小组护理模拟中的认知负荷
背景美国国家航空航天局任务负荷指数(NASATLX)是一种测量认知负荷的主观工具。它最初是为航空业设计的,现已证明是一种有效、可靠的跨学科工具。尽管该工具已被广泛使用,但其在小组和个人护理模拟中测量认知负荷的能力仍有待探索。方法本二次分析调查了 NASA-TLX 的心理测量特性,调查对象是本科护理课程的学员在个人和小组模拟中完成的 488 份调查问卷。心理测试包括项目分析、克朗巴赫α、项目间相关性和探索性因子分析。结果NASA-TLX在个人模拟中表现出了可接受的信度和效度;但在小组模拟中的信度较低。结论个人和小组模拟的管理差异会影响NASATLX的效度和信度。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
5.50
自引率
15.40%
发文量
107
期刊介绍: Clinical Simulation in Nursing is an international, peer reviewed journal published online monthly. Clinical Simulation in Nursing is the official journal of the International Nursing Association for Clinical Simulation & Learning (INACSL) and reflects its mission to advance the science of healthcare simulation. We will review and accept articles from other health provider disciplines, if they are determined to be of interest to our readership. The journal accepts manuscripts meeting one or more of the following criteria: Research articles and literature reviews (e.g. systematic, scoping, umbrella, integrative, etc.) about simulation Innovative teaching/learning strategies using simulation Articles updating guidelines, regulations, and legislative policies that impact simulation Leadership for simulation Simulation operations Clinical and academic uses of simulation.
期刊最新文献
Embracing quick response technology to bring assessments to life during simulation Combining storytelling and a scenario re-enactment of Mt. Everest expeditions to practice cognitive and social skills Psychometric Testing of NASA-TLX to Measure Learners’ Cognitive Load in Individual and Group Nursing Simulations Becoming a team player: Evaluating a simulation interprofessional activity between third year nursing students and second year medical radiation science students - A feasibility study Interprofessional Learning for Nursing Students during a Mass Casualty Incident Simulation
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1