Kolmogorov n-widths for multitask physics-informed machine learning (PIML) methods: Towards robust metrics

IF 6 1区 计算机科学 Q1 COMPUTER SCIENCE, ARTIFICIAL INTELLIGENCE Neural Networks Pub Date : 2024-09-04 DOI:10.1016/j.neunet.2024.106703
{"title":"Kolmogorov n-widths for multitask physics-informed machine learning (PIML) methods: Towards robust metrics","authors":"","doi":"10.1016/j.neunet.2024.106703","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>Physics-informed machine learning (PIML) as a means of solving partial differential equations (PDEs) has garnered much attention in the Computational Science and Engineering (CS&amp;E) world. This topic encompasses a broad array of methods and models aimed at solving a single or a collection of PDE problems, called multitask learning. PIML is characterized by the incorporation of physical laws into the training process of machine learning models in lieu of large data when solving PDE problems. Despite the overall success of this collection of methods, it remains incredibly difficult to analyze, benchmark, and generally compare one approach to another. Using Kolmogorov n-widths as a measure of effectiveness of approximating functions, we judiciously apply this metric in the comparison of various multitask PIML architectures. We compute lower accuracy bounds and analyze the model’s learned basis functions on various PDE problems. This is the first objective metric for comparing multitask PIML architectures and helps remove uncertainty in model validation from selective sampling and overfitting. We also identify avenues of improvement for model architectures, such as the choice of activation function, which can drastically affect model generalization to “worst-case” scenarios, which is not observed when reporting task-specific errors. We also incorporate this metric into the optimization process through regularization, which improves the models’ generalizability over the multitask PDE problem.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":49763,"journal":{"name":"Neural Networks","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":6.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-09-04","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Neural Networks","FirstCategoryId":"94","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0893608024006270","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"计算机科学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"COMPUTER SCIENCE, ARTIFICIAL INTELLIGENCE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Physics-informed machine learning (PIML) as a means of solving partial differential equations (PDEs) has garnered much attention in the Computational Science and Engineering (CS&E) world. This topic encompasses a broad array of methods and models aimed at solving a single or a collection of PDE problems, called multitask learning. PIML is characterized by the incorporation of physical laws into the training process of machine learning models in lieu of large data when solving PDE problems. Despite the overall success of this collection of methods, it remains incredibly difficult to analyze, benchmark, and generally compare one approach to another. Using Kolmogorov n-widths as a measure of effectiveness of approximating functions, we judiciously apply this metric in the comparison of various multitask PIML architectures. We compute lower accuracy bounds and analyze the model’s learned basis functions on various PDE problems. This is the first objective metric for comparing multitask PIML architectures and helps remove uncertainty in model validation from selective sampling and overfitting. We also identify avenues of improvement for model architectures, such as the choice of activation function, which can drastically affect model generalization to “worst-case” scenarios, which is not observed when reporting task-specific errors. We also incorporate this metric into the optimization process through regularization, which improves the models’ generalizability over the multitask PDE problem.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
多任务物理信息机器学习(PIML)方法的柯尔莫哥洛夫 n 宽:实现稳健度量
物理信息机器学习(PIML)作为求解偏微分方程(PDE)的一种手段,在计算科学与工程(CS&E)领域备受关注。这一主题包括一系列广泛的方法和模型,旨在解决单个或一系列 PDE 问题,即所谓的多任务学习。PIML 的特点是在解决 PDE 问题时,将物理规律纳入机器学习模型的训练过程,以代替大数据。尽管这一系列方法总体上取得了成功,但要对一种方法与另一种方法进行分析、基准测试和总体比较,仍然非常困难。我们使用 Kolmogorov n 宽作为近似函数有效性的衡量标准,在比较各种多任务 PIML 架构时明智地应用了这一指标。我们计算了精度下限,并分析了模型在各种 PDE 问题上学习到的基函数。这是首个用于比较多任务 PIML 架构的客观指标,有助于消除选择性采样和过度拟合带来的模型验证不确定性。我们还确定了模型架构的改进途径,例如激活函数的选择,这会极大地影响模型对 "最坏情况 "场景的泛化,而在报告特定任务误差时却观察不到这一点。我们还通过正则化将这一指标纳入优化过程,从而提高了模型对多任务 PDE 问题的泛化能力。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Neural Networks
Neural Networks 工程技术-计算机:人工智能
CiteScore
13.90
自引率
7.70%
发文量
425
审稿时长
67 days
期刊介绍: Neural Networks is a platform that aims to foster an international community of scholars and practitioners interested in neural networks, deep learning, and other approaches to artificial intelligence and machine learning. Our journal invites submissions covering various aspects of neural networks research, from computational neuroscience and cognitive modeling to mathematical analyses and engineering applications. By providing a forum for interdisciplinary discussions between biology and technology, we aim to encourage the development of biologically-inspired artificial intelligence.
期刊最新文献
Multi-focus image fusion with parameter adaptive dual channel dynamic threshold neural P systems. Joint computation offloading and resource allocation for end-edge collaboration in internet of vehicles via multi-agent reinforcement learning. An information-theoretic perspective of physical adversarial patches. Contrastive fine-grained domain adaptation network for EEG-based vigilance estimation. Decoupling visual and identity features for adversarial palm-vein image attack
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1