Nursing students’ perceptions and satisfaction with a self-learning methodology in simulated environments: A mixed-methods study

IF 3.3 3区 医学 Q1 NURSING Nurse Education in Practice Pub Date : 2024-09-12 DOI:10.1016/j.nepr.2024.104141
Rocío Romero-Castillo , Miguel Garrido-Bueno , Pablo Fernández-León
{"title":"Nursing students’ perceptions and satisfaction with a self-learning methodology in simulated environments: A mixed-methods study","authors":"Rocío Romero-Castillo ,&nbsp;Miguel Garrido-Bueno ,&nbsp;Pablo Fernández-León","doi":"10.1016/j.nepr.2024.104141","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Aim</h3><p>The aim of this study was to explore the perceptions and satisfaction of last-year nursing students with the Self-Learning Methodology in Simulated Environments (MAES©).</p></div><div><h3>Background</h3><p>As a learning method, clinical simulation uses elements that replicate real clinical practice scenarios and facilitates the acquisition of competencies and learning objectives. Simulations promote critical thinking, knowledge, techniques and teamwork in nursing students. The Self-Learning Methodology in Simulated Environments (MAES©) is a method that integrates problem-based learning with realistic clinical simulation.</p></div><div><h3>Design</h3><p>A cross-sectional mixed-method study implemented a simulation learning method as part of the mandatory nursing training practice; that was registered in Open Science Framework (Registration DOI: <span><span>https://doi.org/10.17605/OSF.IO/R89PZ</span><svg><path></path></svg></span>).</p></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><p>Students were invited to complete a cross-sectional questionnaire about satisfaction with the simulation and were asked to participate in an interview about their perceptions on the simulation. All data were collected in December 2023 in a mid-sized southern Spanish university. A total of 69 last-year nursing students were enrolled in the simulation course and were selected using eligibility criteria.</p></div><div><h3>Results</h3><p>Satisfaction measures showed no significant differences across gender, university access, or age (p&gt;0.05 each). However, strong correlations were found between students' preference for the simulation method and perceived effort value (p&lt;0.001 each). Qualitative analysis identified key themes in different stages of simulation (prebriefing, scenario, briefing, debriefing), simulation benefits (learning, usefulness, positive emotions) and challenges (difficulty, realism, time constraints). Despite some realism concerns, overall, students viewed the methodology positively.</p></div><div><h3>Conclusions</h3><p>The findings of this study underscore the vital role of simulation-based learning in nursing education. As the field of nursing continues to evolve, so too must the educational methods we employ, with simulation-based learning standing at the forefront of this transformative journey.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":48715,"journal":{"name":"Nurse Education in Practice","volume":"80 ","pages":"Article 104141"},"PeriodicalIF":3.3000,"publicationDate":"2024-09-12","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1471595324002701/pdfft?md5=6ed2603857a920874999fc4e136ba181&pid=1-s2.0-S1471595324002701-main.pdf","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Nurse Education in Practice","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1471595324002701","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"NURSING","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Aim

The aim of this study was to explore the perceptions and satisfaction of last-year nursing students with the Self-Learning Methodology in Simulated Environments (MAES©).

Background

As a learning method, clinical simulation uses elements that replicate real clinical practice scenarios and facilitates the acquisition of competencies and learning objectives. Simulations promote critical thinking, knowledge, techniques and teamwork in nursing students. The Self-Learning Methodology in Simulated Environments (MAES©) is a method that integrates problem-based learning with realistic clinical simulation.

Design

A cross-sectional mixed-method study implemented a simulation learning method as part of the mandatory nursing training practice; that was registered in Open Science Framework (Registration DOI: https://doi.org/10.17605/OSF.IO/R89PZ).

Methods

Students were invited to complete a cross-sectional questionnaire about satisfaction with the simulation and were asked to participate in an interview about their perceptions on the simulation. All data were collected in December 2023 in a mid-sized southern Spanish university. A total of 69 last-year nursing students were enrolled in the simulation course and were selected using eligibility criteria.

Results

Satisfaction measures showed no significant differences across gender, university access, or age (p>0.05 each). However, strong correlations were found between students' preference for the simulation method and perceived effort value (p<0.001 each). Qualitative analysis identified key themes in different stages of simulation (prebriefing, scenario, briefing, debriefing), simulation benefits (learning, usefulness, positive emotions) and challenges (difficulty, realism, time constraints). Despite some realism concerns, overall, students viewed the methodology positively.

Conclusions

The findings of this study underscore the vital role of simulation-based learning in nursing education. As the field of nursing continues to evolve, so too must the educational methods we employ, with simulation-based learning standing at the forefront of this transformative journey.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
护理专业学生对模拟环境中自学方法的看法和满意度:混合方法研究
背景作为一种学习方法,临床模拟使用的元素复制了真实的临床实践场景,促进了能力和学习目标的获得。模拟教学可促进护理专业学生的批判性思维、知识、技术和团队合作。模拟环境中的自学方法(MAES©)是一种将基于问题的学习与真实的临床模拟相结合的方法。设计一项横断面混合方法研究,将模拟学习方法作为护理培训实践必修课程的一部分;该研究已在开放科学框架中注册(注册 DOI:https://doi.org/10.17605/OSF.IO/R89PZ)。方法邀请学生填写一份横断面问卷,了解他们对模拟学习的满意度,并要求他们参加访谈,了解他们对模拟学习的看法。所有数据于 2023 年 12 月在西班牙南部一所中等规模的大学收集。共有 69 名护理专业的最后一年学生参加了模拟课程,他们都是根据资格标准选拔出来的。结果满意度测量结果显示,不同性别、就读大学和年龄之间没有显著差异(p>0.05)。然而,在学生对模拟方法的偏好和感知的努力价值之间发现了很强的相关性(p<0.001)。定性分析确定了模拟不同阶段(汇报前、情景模拟、简报、汇报)、模拟益处(学习、有用性、积极情绪)和挑战(难度、逼真度、时间限制)的关键主题。尽管存在一些对真实性的担忧,但总体而言,学生对该方法的评价是积极的。随着护理领域的不断发展,我们所采用的教育方法也必须与时俱进,而模拟学习则是这一变革历程中的佼佼者。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
5.40
自引率
9.40%
发文量
180
审稿时长
51 days
期刊介绍: Nurse Education in Practice enables lecturers and practitioners to both share and disseminate evidence that demonstrates the actual practice of education as it is experienced in the realities of their respective work environments. It is supportive of new authors and will be at the forefront in publishing individual and collaborative papers that demonstrate the link between education and practice.
期刊最新文献
Effectiveness of high versus mixed-level fidelity simulation on undergraduate nursing students: A randomised controlled trial Effectiveness of an e-book in enhancing knowledge, coping behaviors and preventive strategies for sexual harassment prevention among new nurses: A randomized controlled study Features influencing surface acting of different clusters of nursing students in vocational college based on interpretable machine learning: A cross-sectional study Impact of a mindful self-compassion workshop incorporating sandtray on burnout in undergraduate nursing students: A mixed methods, pre-post study Professional identity development of advanced practice nurses: Evaluating its integration in curricula and relevance for professional practice
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1