Damage propagation and failure mechanism of single dome historical Masonry Mosque after February 6, 2023, Kahramanmaraş earthquake doublets (Mw = 7.7 and Mw = 7.6)

IF 3.9 2区 工程技术 Q1 ENGINEERING, CIVIL Structures Pub Date : 2024-09-18 DOI:10.1016/j.istruc.2024.107288
{"title":"Damage propagation and failure mechanism of single dome historical Masonry Mosque after February 6, 2023, Kahramanmaraş earthquake doublets (Mw = 7.7 and Mw = 7.6)","authors":"","doi":"10.1016/j.istruc.2024.107288","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>Many historical masonry mosques and minarets, including Milky Minaret Mosque and Ulu Mosque, which are very close to Ak Minaret Mosque in Malatya, suffered severe damage and collapsed after the Kahramanmaraş earthquake on February 6, 2023. Despite the settled loose soil properties and the presence of a small stream flow near the mosque, Ak Minaret Mosque, a historical masonry mosque with a single dome and square, remains operational even after the aforementioned earthquakes. Additionally, DEMA's strong ground motion station was out of service during both earthquakes. This situation raises questions about the mosque's ability to withstand the seismic load. The basic purpose of this paper is to investigate in detail the seismic performance, damage limits, the reason for unexpectedly less damage due to the earthquakes, the potential failure mode, and possible resisted earthquake loads of the historical Ak Minaret Mosque in Malatya, Türkiye. To achieve this goal, first, dynamic identification was performed on the mosque one year prior to the aforementioned earthquakes. Next, the material properties were determined using both non-destructive and destructive testing methods. Following the dynamic identification, a numerical model was generated by 3-D solid elements, and this 3-D model was calibrated using the dynamic identification tests. The mosque underwent both nonlinear static and nonlinear dynamic analyses. Nine seismic records were selected for the nonlinear dynamic analysis. Five of them were national, including even Kahramanmaraş earthquake records, and three of them were selected from an international database on the basis of fault characteristics and site classification. The analysis results indicate that Ak Minaret Mosque incurred less damage than expected during the Kahramanmaraş earthquakes. This could be due to soil improvement prior to the construction of Ak Minaret Mosque in 1573. Moreover, the effective restoration increased stiffness and maintained the mosque’s stability. Finally, the possible resisted PGA by the mosque was around 0.22 g.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":48642,"journal":{"name":"Structures","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":3.9000,"publicationDate":"2024-09-18","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Structures","FirstCategoryId":"5","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2352012424014401","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"工程技术","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ENGINEERING, CIVIL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Many historical masonry mosques and minarets, including Milky Minaret Mosque and Ulu Mosque, which are very close to Ak Minaret Mosque in Malatya, suffered severe damage and collapsed after the Kahramanmaraş earthquake on February 6, 2023. Despite the settled loose soil properties and the presence of a small stream flow near the mosque, Ak Minaret Mosque, a historical masonry mosque with a single dome and square, remains operational even after the aforementioned earthquakes. Additionally, DEMA's strong ground motion station was out of service during both earthquakes. This situation raises questions about the mosque's ability to withstand the seismic load. The basic purpose of this paper is to investigate in detail the seismic performance, damage limits, the reason for unexpectedly less damage due to the earthquakes, the potential failure mode, and possible resisted earthquake loads of the historical Ak Minaret Mosque in Malatya, Türkiye. To achieve this goal, first, dynamic identification was performed on the mosque one year prior to the aforementioned earthquakes. Next, the material properties were determined using both non-destructive and destructive testing methods. Following the dynamic identification, a numerical model was generated by 3-D solid elements, and this 3-D model was calibrated using the dynamic identification tests. The mosque underwent both nonlinear static and nonlinear dynamic analyses. Nine seismic records were selected for the nonlinear dynamic analysis. Five of them were national, including even Kahramanmaraş earthquake records, and three of them were selected from an international database on the basis of fault characteristics and site classification. The analysis results indicate that Ak Minaret Mosque incurred less damage than expected during the Kahramanmaraş earthquakes. This could be due to soil improvement prior to the construction of Ak Minaret Mosque in 1573. Moreover, the effective restoration increased stiffness and maintained the mosque’s stability. Finally, the possible resisted PGA by the mosque was around 0.22 g.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Structures
Structures Engineering-Architecture
CiteScore
5.70
自引率
17.10%
发文量
1187
期刊介绍: Structures aims to publish internationally-leading research across the full breadth of structural engineering. Papers for Structures are particularly welcome in which high-quality research will benefit from wide readership of academics and practitioners such that not only high citation rates but also tangible industrial-related pathways to impact are achieved.
期刊最新文献
Efficient sensitivity analysis for structural seismic fragility assessment based on surrogate models Experimental investigation on the compression-bending performance of rubberized concrete columns confined by galvanized corrugated steel tubes Damage propagation and failure mechanism of single dome historical Masonry Mosque after February 6, 2023, Kahramanmaraş earthquake doublets (Mw = 7.7 and Mw = 7.6) Seismic performance of pentagonal type aluminum alloy suspen-dome structure with large opening Comparative analysis of GFRP and CFRP bars for marine concrete: Insights into influence on the bond performance
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1