Comparative analysis of GFRP and CFRP bars for marine concrete: Insights into influence on the bond performance

IF 3.9 2区 工程技术 Q1 ENGINEERING, CIVIL Structures Pub Date : 2024-09-18 DOI:10.1016/j.istruc.2024.107273
{"title":"Comparative analysis of GFRP and CFRP bars for marine concrete: Insights into influence on the bond performance","authors":"","doi":"10.1016/j.istruc.2024.107273","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>Fibre-reinforced polymer (FRP) bars are usually manufactured with diverse surface configurations to increase their bond to surrounding matrix. The bond performance is highly dependent on many factors such as the fibre type, surface configuration and environmental conditions. In this research, the bond performance of glass and carbon FRP bars were comparatively analysed to estimate their potentials in marine concrete, with the aim of mechanical and economic considerations. Influences from the w/c ratio change and harmful seawater solutes of Cl<sup>-</sup> and SO<sub>4</sub><sup>2-</sup> were explored. Impact of the revealed bond interface failure modes on the concrete member strength was examined via three-point bending test using beams with FRP bars as the flexural reinforcement. GFRP bars were measured to achieve an ultimate bond stress ∼4 times higher than CFRP bars, induced from their bond interface failure difference that occurred at the surface-rib-to-concrete for GFRP bars and at the surface-coating-to-interior-FRP for CFRP bars. The reduced w/c ratio increased the bond stress of CFRP bars while the accelerated chloride and sulfate exposures mainly reduced the initial bond stress of GFRP bars. Generally, the interface bond failure that happened at the surface-rib-to-concrete by GFRP bars exhibited better strength development and reinforcing effectiveness than that at the interior-FRP-to-coating for CFRP bars. This research concluded by estimating factors that manifested the bond performance and reinforcing effectiveness difference between tested GFRP and CFRP bars. These factors combined results from the pull-out and three-point bending tests, providing a more holistic approach to compare the FRP bar interface bond performance.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":48642,"journal":{"name":"Structures","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":3.9000,"publicationDate":"2024-09-18","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2352012424014255/pdfft?md5=afe13c1ea75a97d47e2c00abdf014b22&pid=1-s2.0-S2352012424014255-main.pdf","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Structures","FirstCategoryId":"5","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2352012424014255","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"工程技术","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ENGINEERING, CIVIL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Fibre-reinforced polymer (FRP) bars are usually manufactured with diverse surface configurations to increase their bond to surrounding matrix. The bond performance is highly dependent on many factors such as the fibre type, surface configuration and environmental conditions. In this research, the bond performance of glass and carbon FRP bars were comparatively analysed to estimate their potentials in marine concrete, with the aim of mechanical and economic considerations. Influences from the w/c ratio change and harmful seawater solutes of Cl- and SO42- were explored. Impact of the revealed bond interface failure modes on the concrete member strength was examined via three-point bending test using beams with FRP bars as the flexural reinforcement. GFRP bars were measured to achieve an ultimate bond stress ∼4 times higher than CFRP bars, induced from their bond interface failure difference that occurred at the surface-rib-to-concrete for GFRP bars and at the surface-coating-to-interior-FRP for CFRP bars. The reduced w/c ratio increased the bond stress of CFRP bars while the accelerated chloride and sulfate exposures mainly reduced the initial bond stress of GFRP bars. Generally, the interface bond failure that happened at the surface-rib-to-concrete by GFRP bars exhibited better strength development and reinforcing effectiveness than that at the interior-FRP-to-coating for CFRP bars. This research concluded by estimating factors that manifested the bond performance and reinforcing effectiveness difference between tested GFRP and CFRP bars. These factors combined results from the pull-out and three-point bending tests, providing a more holistic approach to compare the FRP bar interface bond performance.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Structures
Structures Engineering-Architecture
CiteScore
5.70
自引率
17.10%
发文量
1187
期刊介绍: Structures aims to publish internationally-leading research across the full breadth of structural engineering. Papers for Structures are particularly welcome in which high-quality research will benefit from wide readership of academics and practitioners such that not only high citation rates but also tangible industrial-related pathways to impact are achieved.
期刊最新文献
Efficient sensitivity analysis for structural seismic fragility assessment based on surrogate models Experimental investigation on the compression-bending performance of rubberized concrete columns confined by galvanized corrugated steel tubes Damage propagation and failure mechanism of single dome historical Masonry Mosque after February 6, 2023, Kahramanmaraş earthquake doublets (Mw = 7.7 and Mw = 7.6) Seismic performance of pentagonal type aluminum alloy suspen-dome structure with large opening Comparative analysis of GFRP and CFRP bars for marine concrete: Insights into influence on the bond performance
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1