Appropriateness of proton pump Inhibitor therapy in patients with cirrhosis: a retrospective study

IF 4 3区 医学 Q1 GASTROENTEROLOGY & HEPATOLOGY Digestive and Liver Disease Pub Date : 2024-09-01 DOI:10.1016/j.dld.2024.08.023
G. Santamorena , A. Pasta , S. Labanca , S. Marenco , G. Pieri , M.C. Plaz Torres , E.G. Giannini
{"title":"Appropriateness of proton pump Inhibitor therapy in patients with cirrhosis: a retrospective study","authors":"G. Santamorena ,&nbsp;A. Pasta ,&nbsp;S. Labanca ,&nbsp;S. Marenco ,&nbsp;G. Pieri ,&nbsp;M.C. Plaz Torres ,&nbsp;E.G. Giannini","doi":"10.1016/j.dld.2024.08.023","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Introduction</h3><p>Proton pump inhibitors (PPIs) are commonly prescribed for gastroesophageal reflux disease (GERD) or prophylaxis of non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs and aspirin-induced gastric damage. However, their prolonged use in cirrhotic patients has been linked to complications like spontaneous bacterial peritonitis (SBP) and hepatic encephalopathy (EE).</p></div><div><h3>Aim</h3><p>To evaluate the appropriateness of PPI therapy in patients with cirrhosis.</p></div><div><h3>Materials and Methods</h3><p>We reviewed medical records of 209 cirrhotic patients admitted to our gastrointestinal ward (December 2021-December 2022). Demographics, clinical characteristics, PPI use indications, and incidence of EE and SBP were assessed.</p></div><div><h3>Results</h3><p>The median age was 69 years, and 74.4% were males. Main reasons for hospitalization were hepatocellular carcinoma (n=63, 28.7%), elective diagnostic-therapeutic procedures (n=63, 28.7%), non-liver-related events (n=54, 24.7%), and acute decompensation (n=39, 17.7%). Etiology of liver disease was alcohol in 91 patients (41.6%), virus-related in 77 (35.1%), and metabolic-associated in 30 (13.7%). The median MELD-Na score was 10 (8-14). At admission, 145 patients (66.2%) were on PPIs: of these, 42 patients (29.0%) had confirmed GERD, 12 (8.3%) had esophagitis ≥grade B, and 27 (18.6%) were on aspirin with bleeding risk-factors. Overall, inappropriate PPI use was observed in 74 patients (44.1%). Patients on PPIs were older, with higher MELD-Na and creatinine, and lower hemoglobin and Na compared to those not on PPIs (p&lt;0.05). Multivariate analysis showed that PPI use was independently associated with older age (OR 1.03, IC95% 1.01-1.07) and lower hemoglobin (OR 0.82, IC95% 0.70-0.97). During a median follow-up of 18 months, the incidence of EE and SBP did not differ between PPI users and non-users.</p></div><div><h3>Conclusions</h3><p>A significant proportion of patients with cirrhosis is inappropriately prescribed PPIs. Although this did not correlate with major liver-related events in the short term, proper PPI prescription education is crucial to prevent potential long-term consequences.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":11268,"journal":{"name":"Digestive and Liver Disease","volume":"56 ","pages":"Page S325"},"PeriodicalIF":4.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-09-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Digestive and Liver Disease","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1590865824009423","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"GASTROENTEROLOGY & HEPATOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Introduction

Proton pump inhibitors (PPIs) are commonly prescribed for gastroesophageal reflux disease (GERD) or prophylaxis of non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs and aspirin-induced gastric damage. However, their prolonged use in cirrhotic patients has been linked to complications like spontaneous bacterial peritonitis (SBP) and hepatic encephalopathy (EE).

Aim

To evaluate the appropriateness of PPI therapy in patients with cirrhosis.

Materials and Methods

We reviewed medical records of 209 cirrhotic patients admitted to our gastrointestinal ward (December 2021-December 2022). Demographics, clinical characteristics, PPI use indications, and incidence of EE and SBP were assessed.

Results

The median age was 69 years, and 74.4% were males. Main reasons for hospitalization were hepatocellular carcinoma (n=63, 28.7%), elective diagnostic-therapeutic procedures (n=63, 28.7%), non-liver-related events (n=54, 24.7%), and acute decompensation (n=39, 17.7%). Etiology of liver disease was alcohol in 91 patients (41.6%), virus-related in 77 (35.1%), and metabolic-associated in 30 (13.7%). The median MELD-Na score was 10 (8-14). At admission, 145 patients (66.2%) were on PPIs: of these, 42 patients (29.0%) had confirmed GERD, 12 (8.3%) had esophagitis ≥grade B, and 27 (18.6%) were on aspirin with bleeding risk-factors. Overall, inappropriate PPI use was observed in 74 patients (44.1%). Patients on PPIs were older, with higher MELD-Na and creatinine, and lower hemoglobin and Na compared to those not on PPIs (p<0.05). Multivariate analysis showed that PPI use was independently associated with older age (OR 1.03, IC95% 1.01-1.07) and lower hemoglobin (OR 0.82, IC95% 0.70-0.97). During a median follow-up of 18 months, the incidence of EE and SBP did not differ between PPI users and non-users.

Conclusions

A significant proportion of patients with cirrhosis is inappropriately prescribed PPIs. Although this did not correlate with major liver-related events in the short term, proper PPI prescription education is crucial to prevent potential long-term consequences.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
肝硬化患者质子泵抑制剂治疗的适宜性:一项回顾性研究
导言质子泵抑制剂(PPI)通常用于治疗胃食管反流病(GERD)或预防非甾体抗炎药物和阿司匹林引起的胃损伤。然而,肝硬化患者长期使用这些药物与自发性细菌性腹膜炎(SBP)和肝性脑病(EE)等并发症有关。材料与方法我们回顾了胃肠病房收治的 209 名肝硬化患者的病历(2021 年 12 月至 2022 年 12 月)。结果中位年龄为 69 岁,74.4% 为男性。住院的主要原因是肝细胞癌(63人,占28.7%)、选择性诊断治疗程序(63人,占28.7%)、非肝脏相关事件(54人,占24.7%)和急性失代偿(39人,占17.7%)。91名患者(41.6%)的肝病病因与酒精有关,77名患者(35.1%)的病因与病毒有关,30名患者(13.7%)的病因与代谢有关。MELD-Na 评分的中位数为 10(8-14 分)。入院时,145 名患者(66.2%)服用了 PPIs:其中,42 名患者(29.0%)确诊患有胃食管反流病,12 名患者(8.3%)患有≥B 级食管炎,27 名患者(18.6%)服用了具有出血风险因素的阿司匹林。总体而言,有 74 名患者(44.1%)不适当地使用了 PPI。与未服用 PPIs 的患者相比,服用 PPIs 的患者年龄更大,MELD-Na 和肌酐更高,血红蛋白和 Na 更低(p<0.05)。多变量分析显示,使用 PPI 与年龄较大(OR 1.03,IC95% 1.01-1.07)和血红蛋白较低(OR 0.82,IC95% 0.70-0.97)独立相关。在中位随访 18 个月期间,PPI 使用者和非使用者的 EE 和 SBP 发生率没有差异。尽管短期内这与重大肝脏相关事件并无关联,但适当的 PPI 处方教育对于预防潜在的长期后果至关重要。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Digestive and Liver Disease
Digestive and Liver Disease 医学-胃肠肝病学
CiteScore
6.10
自引率
2.20%
发文量
632
审稿时长
19 days
期刊介绍: Digestive and Liver Disease is an international journal of Gastroenterology and Hepatology. It is the official journal of Italian Association for the Study of the Liver (AISF); Italian Association for the Study of the Pancreas (AISP); Italian Association for Digestive Endoscopy (SIED); Italian Association for Hospital Gastroenterologists and Digestive Endoscopists (AIGO); Italian Society of Gastroenterology (SIGE); Italian Society of Pediatric Gastroenterology and Hepatology (SIGENP) and Italian Group for the Study of Inflammatory Bowel Disease (IG-IBD). Digestive and Liver Disease publishes papers on basic and clinical research in the field of gastroenterology and hepatology. Contributions consist of: Original Papers Correspondence to the Editor Editorials, Reviews and Special Articles Progress Reports Image of the Month Congress Proceedings Symposia and Mini-symposia.
期刊最新文献
Small bowel metastasis from pulmonary pleomorphic carcinoma. Mannitol for bowel preparation: Efficacy and safety results from the SATISFACTION randomised clinical trial. Dexamethasone improves clinical and biological tolerance of transcatheter arterial chemoembolization for hepatocellular carcinoma. Enhanced bowel prep quality with 1L-PEG vs 2L-PEG and picosulphate: Real-world retrospective study. Exploring the role of fatty acid esters of hydroxy fatty acids in metabolic dysfunction-associated steatotic liver disease in morbidly obese women.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1