Developing Grounded Theory Systematic Approach for Logistics and Supply Chain Management Research

IF 11.2 2区 管理学 Q1 MANAGEMENT Journal of Business Logistics Pub Date : 2024-09-17 DOI:10.1111/jbl.12396
Martyna Wilczewska, Joanicjusz Nazarko
{"title":"Developing Grounded Theory Systematic Approach for Logistics and Supply Chain Management Research","authors":"Martyna Wilczewska,&nbsp;Joanicjusz Nazarko","doi":"10.1111/jbl.12396","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div>\n \n <p>The emergence of the supply chain management (SCM) discipline and its integration with other research fields, such as logistics, has sparked research that aims to combine scientific rigor with business utility. Calls for increased theory-building and practically relevant research have driven the discipline's development. This article advocates the wider use of grounded theory methodology, providing practical guidance to ensure reliable theoretical contributions. The study employs a multi-method approach (bibliometric analysis, mapping review, and state-of-the-art analysis) to quantitatively review existing grounded theory research on logistics and SCM issues, investigate its methodological attributes, and outline its strengths and weaknesses. Based on these findings, guidelines are proposed for methodologically sound grounded theory building in the discipline. Derived from empirically grounded theory studies, these guidelines address issues that hinder the effective use of the method, such as misunderstanding its fundamentals, improper use of literature, coding challenges, inadequate research design, and difficulties in transitioning from analysis to theorizing. By adding an empirical perspective to supplement existing guidelines, the study aims to enhance the quality of SCM research. While grounded theory is not the only solution for advancing the discipline, its judicious use is advocated to bring rigorous, theory-driven, and practice-oriented contributions to logistics and SCM research.</p>\n </div>","PeriodicalId":48090,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Business Logistics","volume":"45 4","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":11.2000,"publicationDate":"2024-09-17","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Business Logistics","FirstCategoryId":"91","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/jbl.12396","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"管理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"MANAGEMENT","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

The emergence of the supply chain management (SCM) discipline and its integration with other research fields, such as logistics, has sparked research that aims to combine scientific rigor with business utility. Calls for increased theory-building and practically relevant research have driven the discipline's development. This article advocates the wider use of grounded theory methodology, providing practical guidance to ensure reliable theoretical contributions. The study employs a multi-method approach (bibliometric analysis, mapping review, and state-of-the-art analysis) to quantitatively review existing grounded theory research on logistics and SCM issues, investigate its methodological attributes, and outline its strengths and weaknesses. Based on these findings, guidelines are proposed for methodologically sound grounded theory building in the discipline. Derived from empirically grounded theory studies, these guidelines address issues that hinder the effective use of the method, such as misunderstanding its fundamentals, improper use of literature, coding challenges, inadequate research design, and difficulties in transitioning from analysis to theorizing. By adding an empirical perspective to supplement existing guidelines, the study aims to enhance the quality of SCM research. While grounded theory is not the only solution for advancing the discipline, its judicious use is advocated to bring rigorous, theory-driven, and practice-oriented contributions to logistics and SCM research.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
为物流与供应链管理研究开发基础理论系统方法
供应链管理(SCM)学科的出现及其与物流等其他研究领域的融合,引发了旨在将科学严谨性与商业实用性相结合的研究。加强理论建设和实用性研究的呼声推动了该学科的发展。本文倡导更广泛地使用基础理论方法,为确保可靠的理论贡献提供实践指导。本研究采用多种方法(文献计量分析、图谱回顾和最新分析),定量回顾了有关物流和供应链管理问题的现有基础理论研究,调查了其方法论属性,并概述了其优缺点。在这些研究结果的基础上,提出了在该学科中构建方法合理的基础理论的指导原则。这些指导原则源于实证基础理论研究,解决了妨碍有效使用该方法的问题,如误解其基本原理、文献使用不当、编码难题、研究设计不足以及从分析过渡到理论化的困难。通过增加实证视角来补充现有指南,本研究旨在提高单片机研究的质量。虽然基础理论并不是推动该学科发展的唯一解决方案,但我们提倡合理使用基础理论,为物流和供应链管理研究带来严谨、理论驱动和以实践为导向的贡献。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
14.40
自引率
14.60%
发文量
34
期刊介绍: Supply chain management and logistics processes play a crucial role in the success of businesses, both in terms of operations, strategy, and finances. To gain a deep understanding of these processes, it is essential to explore academic literature such as The Journal of Business Logistics. This journal serves as a scholarly platform for sharing original ideas, research findings, and effective strategies in the field of logistics and supply chain management. By providing innovative insights and research-driven knowledge, it equips organizations with the necessary tools to navigate the ever-changing business environment.
期刊最新文献
The Impact of Product Packaging Characteristics on Order Picking Performance in Grocery Retailing Issue Information Consumer-Centric Supply Chain Management: A Literature Review, Framework, and Research Agenda Supply Chain Plasticity: A Responsive Network Capability to Ensure Resilience Last-Mile Delivery: A Process View, Framework, and Research Agenda
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1