Cross-step detection using center-of-pressure based algorithm for real-time applications

IF 5.2 2区 医学 Q1 ENGINEERING, BIOMEDICAL Journal of NeuroEngineering and Rehabilitation Pub Date : 2024-09-16 DOI:10.1186/s12984-024-01460-4
Matjaž Zadravec, Zlatko Matjačić
{"title":"Cross-step detection using center-of-pressure based algorithm for real-time applications","authors":"Matjaž Zadravec, Zlatko Matjačić","doi":"10.1186/s12984-024-01460-4","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Gait event detection is crucial for assessment, evaluation and provision of biofeedback during rehabilitation of walking. Existing online gait event detection algorithms mostly rely on add-on sensors, limiting their practicality. Instrumented treadmills offer a promising alternative by utilizing the Center of Pressure (CoP) signal for real-time gait event detection. However, current methods have limitations, particularly in detecting cross-step events during perturbed walking conditions. We present and validate a CoP-based algorithm to detect gait events and cross-steps in real-time, which combines thresholding and logic techniques. The algorithm was evaluated on CoP datasets from healthy participants (age range 21–61 years), stroke survivors (age range 20–67 years), and people with unilateral transtibial amputation (age range 28–63 years) that underwent perturbation-based balance assessments, encompassing different walking speeds. Detected gait events from a simulated real-time processing operation were compared to offline identified counterparts in order to present related temporal absolute mean errors (AME) and success rate. The proposed algorithm demonstrated high accuracy in detecting gait events during native gait, as well as cross-step events during perturbed walking conditions. It successfully recognized the majority of cross-steps, with a detection success rate of 94%. However, some misclassifications or missed events occurred, mainly due to the complexity of cross-step events. AME for heel strikes (HS) during native gait and cross-step events averaged at 78 ms and 64 ms respectively, while toe off (TO) AME were 126 ms and 111 ms respectively. A statistically significant difference in the algorithm's success rate score in detecting gait events during cross-step intervals was observed across various walking speeds in a sample of 12 healthy participants, while there was no significant difference among groups. The proposed algorithm represents an advancement in gait event detection on instrumented treadmills. By leveraging the CoP signal, it successfully identifies gait events and cross-steps in the simulated real-time processing operation, providing valuable insights into human locomotion. The algorithm's ability to accommodate diverse CoP patterns enhance its applicability to a wide range of individuals and gait characteristics. The algorithm's performance was consistent across different populations, suggesting its potential for diverse clinical and research settings, particularly in the domains of gait analysis and rehabilitation practices.","PeriodicalId":16384,"journal":{"name":"Journal of NeuroEngineering and Rehabilitation","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":5.2000,"publicationDate":"2024-09-16","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of NeuroEngineering and Rehabilitation","FirstCategoryId":"5","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1186/s12984-024-01460-4","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ENGINEERING, BIOMEDICAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Gait event detection is crucial for assessment, evaluation and provision of biofeedback during rehabilitation of walking. Existing online gait event detection algorithms mostly rely on add-on sensors, limiting their practicality. Instrumented treadmills offer a promising alternative by utilizing the Center of Pressure (CoP) signal for real-time gait event detection. However, current methods have limitations, particularly in detecting cross-step events during perturbed walking conditions. We present and validate a CoP-based algorithm to detect gait events and cross-steps in real-time, which combines thresholding and logic techniques. The algorithm was evaluated on CoP datasets from healthy participants (age range 21–61 years), stroke survivors (age range 20–67 years), and people with unilateral transtibial amputation (age range 28–63 years) that underwent perturbation-based balance assessments, encompassing different walking speeds. Detected gait events from a simulated real-time processing operation were compared to offline identified counterparts in order to present related temporal absolute mean errors (AME) and success rate. The proposed algorithm demonstrated high accuracy in detecting gait events during native gait, as well as cross-step events during perturbed walking conditions. It successfully recognized the majority of cross-steps, with a detection success rate of 94%. However, some misclassifications or missed events occurred, mainly due to the complexity of cross-step events. AME for heel strikes (HS) during native gait and cross-step events averaged at 78 ms and 64 ms respectively, while toe off (TO) AME were 126 ms and 111 ms respectively. A statistically significant difference in the algorithm's success rate score in detecting gait events during cross-step intervals was observed across various walking speeds in a sample of 12 healthy participants, while there was no significant difference among groups. The proposed algorithm represents an advancement in gait event detection on instrumented treadmills. By leveraging the CoP signal, it successfully identifies gait events and cross-steps in the simulated real-time processing operation, providing valuable insights into human locomotion. The algorithm's ability to accommodate diverse CoP patterns enhance its applicability to a wide range of individuals and gait characteristics. The algorithm's performance was consistent across different populations, suggesting its potential for diverse clinical and research settings, particularly in the domains of gait analysis and rehabilitation practices.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
利用基于压力中心的算法进行跨步检测,以实现实时应用
步态事件检测对于步行康复过程中的评估、评价和提供生物反馈至关重要。现有的在线步态事件检测算法大多依赖于附加传感器,限制了其实用性。带仪器的跑步机利用压力中心(CoP)信号进行实时步态事件检测,提供了一种有前途的替代方法。然而,目前的方法存在局限性,尤其是在检测扰动行走条件下的交叉步事件时。我们介绍并验证了一种基于 CoP 的算法,该算法结合了阈值和逻辑技术,可实时检测步态事件和交叉步。该算法在健康参与者(年龄在 21-61 岁之间)、中风幸存者(年龄在 20-67 岁之间)和单侧经胫截肢者(年龄在 28-63 岁之间)的 CoP 数据集上进行了评估,这些数据集接受了基于扰动的平衡评估,包括不同的行走速度。将模拟实时处理操作中检测到的步态事件与离线识别的步态事件进行比较,以显示相关的时间绝对平均误差(AME)和成功率。所提出的算法在检测原生步态中的步态事件以及扰动行走条件下的交叉步态事件方面表现出了很高的准确性。它成功识别了大多数交叉步,检测成功率高达 94%。不过,也出现了一些错误分类或遗漏事件,这主要是由于交叉步事件的复杂性。在原生步态和交叉步事件中,脚跟击球(HS)的AME平均值分别为78毫秒和64毫秒,而脚趾离开(TO)的AME分别为126毫秒和111毫秒。在 12 名健康参与者的样本中,在不同步行速度下,该算法检测跨步间隔步态事件的成功率得分在统计学上存在显著差异,而不同组间则无显著差异。所提出的算法代表了仪器跑步机步态事件检测的进步。通过利用 CoP 信号,该算法在模拟实时处理操作中成功识别了步态事件和交叉步,为人类运动提供了宝贵的见解。该算法能够适应不同的CoP模式,从而提高了其对各种个体和步态特征的适用性。该算法在不同人群中的表现是一致的,这表明它在不同的临床和研究环境中,特别是在步态分析和康复实践领域具有潜力。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Journal of NeuroEngineering and Rehabilitation
Journal of NeuroEngineering and Rehabilitation 工程技术-工程:生物医学
CiteScore
9.60
自引率
3.90%
发文量
122
审稿时长
24 months
期刊介绍: Journal of NeuroEngineering and Rehabilitation considers manuscripts on all aspects of research that result from cross-fertilization of the fields of neuroscience, biomedical engineering, and physical medicine & rehabilitation.
期刊最新文献
Comparison of synergy extrapolation and static optimization for estimating multiple unmeasured muscle activations during walking. Immersive virtual reality for learning exoskeleton-like virtual walking: a feasibility study. Instrumented assessment of lower and upper motor neuron signs in amyotrophic lateral sclerosis using robotic manipulation: an explorative study. Rest the brain to learn new gait patterns after stroke. Effects of virtual reality rehabilitation after spinal cord injury: a systematic review and meta-analysis.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1