Examining the Effects of a 24-Week Exercise Program on Functional Capacity, Cognitive Capacity, and Quality of Life in Individuals With Intellectual and Developmental Disabilities.

IF 1.7 3区 医学 Q2 REHABILITATION Adapted Physical Activity Quarterly Pub Date : 2024-09-14 DOI:10.1123/apaq.2024-0085
Miguel Jacinto,Raul Antunes,Diogo Monteiro,Filipe Rodrigues,Nuno Amaro,Maria João Campos,José Pedro Ferreira,Rui Matos
{"title":"Examining the Effects of a 24-Week Exercise Program on Functional Capacity, Cognitive Capacity, and Quality of Life in Individuals With Intellectual and Developmental Disabilities.","authors":"Miguel Jacinto,Raul Antunes,Diogo Monteiro,Filipe Rodrigues,Nuno Amaro,Maria João Campos,José Pedro Ferreira,Rui Matos","doi":"10.1123/apaq.2024-0085","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"This study investigated the effects of two physical exercise programs for adults with intellectual and developmental disabilities. Twenty-one participants were assigned to an indoor group (IG, n = 7; 24-week gym intervention with machine), an outdoor group (OG, n = 7; 24-week outdoor intervention with low-cost materials) or a control group. The outcomes assessed included quality of life, dementia, and functional capacity. The IG significantly improved physical well-being compared with the control group (p = .017). There were no significant differences in dementia score between groups and moments. Postintervention, the IG showed improvements compared with the control group for the 30-s sit-to-stand test (p = .03), timed up-and-go (p = .00), and 6-min-walk test (p = .033) and between moments in the IG for 30-s sit-to-stand test (pre ≠ post; p = .007) and 6-min-walk test (pre ≠ post; p = .007). Outdoor interventions appeared effective for physical well-being, while indoor interventions using weight-training machines benefited functional capacity. No significant effects were observed for dementia/cognitive decline.","PeriodicalId":55553,"journal":{"name":"Adapted Physical Activity Quarterly","volume":"46 1","pages":"1-19"},"PeriodicalIF":1.7000,"publicationDate":"2024-09-14","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Adapted Physical Activity Quarterly","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1123/apaq.2024-0085","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"REHABILITATION","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

This study investigated the effects of two physical exercise programs for adults with intellectual and developmental disabilities. Twenty-one participants were assigned to an indoor group (IG, n = 7; 24-week gym intervention with machine), an outdoor group (OG, n = 7; 24-week outdoor intervention with low-cost materials) or a control group. The outcomes assessed included quality of life, dementia, and functional capacity. The IG significantly improved physical well-being compared with the control group (p = .017). There were no significant differences in dementia score between groups and moments. Postintervention, the IG showed improvements compared with the control group for the 30-s sit-to-stand test (p = .03), timed up-and-go (p = .00), and 6-min-walk test (p = .033) and between moments in the IG for 30-s sit-to-stand test (pre ≠ post; p = .007) and 6-min-walk test (pre ≠ post; p = .007). Outdoor interventions appeared effective for physical well-being, while indoor interventions using weight-training machines benefited functional capacity. No significant effects were observed for dementia/cognitive decline.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
研究为期 24 周的锻炼计划对智力和发育障碍人士的功能能力、认知能力和生活质量的影响。
本研究调查了两项针对智力和发育障碍成人的体育锻炼计划的效果。21 名参与者被分配到室内组(IG,n = 7;为期 24 周,使用健身器材进行干预)、室外组(OG,n = 7;为期 24 周,使用低成本材料进行室外干预)或对照组。评估的结果包括生活质量、痴呆症和功能能力。与对照组相比,IG 明显改善了身体健康(p = .017)。干预组和对照组在痴呆症评分方面没有明显差异。干预后,与对照组相比,综合干预组在 30 秒坐立测试(p = .03)、定时起立行走(p = .00)和 6 分钟步行测试(p = .033)方面有所改善,在 30 秒坐立测试(事前≠事后;p = .007)和 6 分钟步行测试(事前≠事后;p = .007)方面,综合干预组在不同时间段之间也有所改善。户外干预似乎对身体健康有效,而使用重量训练机的室内干预则有利于提高功能能力。在痴呆症/认知能力下降方面没有观察到明显的效果。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
3.00
自引率
10.50%
发文量
26
审稿时长
>12 weeks
期刊介绍: APAQ is an international, peer-reviewed, multidisciplinary journal designed to stimulate and communicate scholarly inquiry relating to physical activity that is adapted in order to enable and enhance performance and participation in people with disability. Physical activity implies fine, gross, functional, and interpretive movement including physical education, recreation, exercise, sport, and dance. The focus of adaptation may be the activity or task that is to be performed, environment and facilities, equipment, instructional methodology, and/or rules governing the performance setting. Among the populations considered are persons with motor, intellectual, sensory, and mental or other disabilities across the life span. Disciplines from which scholarship to this aim may originate include, but are not limited to, physical education, teacher preparation, human development, motor behavior and learning, biomechanics, exercise and sport physiology, and exercise and sport psychology. Scientific inquiry may originate from quantitative or qualitative inquiry, as well as from multimethod designs.
期刊最新文献
Examining Axiological and Ethical Assumptions in Physical Activity Intervention Research involving Individuals With Intellectual Impairments: A Review. Military Sports Recovery Athletes' Perspectives on Role of the Coach in Athletes' Well-Being: The Importance of Supporting Basic Psychological Needs. Assessing the Use of Recommended Practices in Adapted Physical Activity/Education Experiential-Learning Programs. Examining the Effects of a 24-Week Exercise Program on Functional Capacity, Cognitive Capacity, and Quality of Life in Individuals With Intellectual and Developmental Disabilities. APAQ at Forty: Publication Trends.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1