Investigating the combinatorial effects of radiofrequency ablation and anticoagulants in patients with atrial fibrillation and left atrial appendage thrombosis after successful thrombolysis.

IF 4.6 Q2 MATERIALS SCIENCE, BIOMATERIALS ACS Applied Bio Materials Pub Date : 2024-08-23 DOI:10.3892/etm.2024.12696
Yuzhang Sun,Xiaofeng Hu,Changhao Xu,Menghe Zhang,Shaohui Wu,Mu Qin,Xu Liu,Yujiang Dong
{"title":"Investigating the combinatorial effects of radiofrequency ablation and anticoagulants in patients with atrial fibrillation and left atrial appendage thrombosis after successful thrombolysis.","authors":"Yuzhang Sun,Xiaofeng Hu,Changhao Xu,Menghe Zhang,Shaohui Wu,Mu Qin,Xu Liu,Yujiang Dong","doi":"10.3892/etm.2024.12696","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The present study investigated the synergistic effects of radiofrequency ablation and various anticoagulants on adverse outcomes in patients with atrial fibrillation (AF) and left atrial appendage thrombosis following successful thrombolysis. Patients diagnosed with AF and left atrial appendage thrombosis post-successful thrombolysis (n=92) were retrospectively analysed. They were divided into two groups: Group A received radiofrequency ablation combined with an anticoagulant, while Group B received an anticoagulant alone and in combination with antiarrhythmic drugs. Subgroup analyses were conducted based on left atrial diameter (>45 mm), duration of AF (>1 year) and types of anticoagulants. Univariate and multivariate logistic regression analyses were performed to assess stroke and mortality risks in patients with AF with left atrial appendage thrombosis after dissolution. Multivariate logistic regression analysis identified AF duration (>1 year), left atrial diameter (>45 mm) and BNP level as significant risk factors for stroke (P<0.05). Compared with NOACs, the traditional anticoagulants (warfarin) demonstrated higher survival rates and lower stroke incidence in Group B (P<0.05); however, no significant difference was observed within Group A (P>0.05). Radiofrequency ablation combined with anticoagulants appeared to be more effective in treating AF with left atrial appendage thrombosis post-dissolution compared with anticoagulants alone. Attention to AF duration and left atrial diameter is crucial during early patient management. However, the choice between warfarin or NOACs for patients with AF and left atrial appendage thrombosis warrants further investigation.","PeriodicalId":2,"journal":{"name":"ACS Applied Bio Materials","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":4.6000,"publicationDate":"2024-08-23","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"ACS Applied Bio Materials","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3892/etm.2024.12696","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"MATERIALS SCIENCE, BIOMATERIALS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

The present study investigated the synergistic effects of radiofrequency ablation and various anticoagulants on adverse outcomes in patients with atrial fibrillation (AF) and left atrial appendage thrombosis following successful thrombolysis. Patients diagnosed with AF and left atrial appendage thrombosis post-successful thrombolysis (n=92) were retrospectively analysed. They were divided into two groups: Group A received radiofrequency ablation combined with an anticoagulant, while Group B received an anticoagulant alone and in combination with antiarrhythmic drugs. Subgroup analyses were conducted based on left atrial diameter (>45 mm), duration of AF (>1 year) and types of anticoagulants. Univariate and multivariate logistic regression analyses were performed to assess stroke and mortality risks in patients with AF with left atrial appendage thrombosis after dissolution. Multivariate logistic regression analysis identified AF duration (>1 year), left atrial diameter (>45 mm) and BNP level as significant risk factors for stroke (P<0.05). Compared with NOACs, the traditional anticoagulants (warfarin) demonstrated higher survival rates and lower stroke incidence in Group B (P<0.05); however, no significant difference was observed within Group A (P>0.05). Radiofrequency ablation combined with anticoagulants appeared to be more effective in treating AF with left atrial appendage thrombosis post-dissolution compared with anticoagulants alone. Attention to AF duration and left atrial diameter is crucial during early patient management. However, the choice between warfarin or NOACs for patients with AF and left atrial appendage thrombosis warrants further investigation.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
研究射频消融和抗凝剂对成功溶栓后心房颤动和左心房阑尾血栓形成患者的联合作用。
本研究调查了射频消融和各种抗凝药物对成功溶栓后心房颤动(房颤)和左心房阑尾血栓形成患者不良预后的协同作用。对成功溶栓后确诊为房颤和左心房阑尾血栓形成的患者(92 人)进行了回顾性分析。他们被分为两组:A 组接受射频消融术并联合使用抗凝剂,B 组单独或联合使用抗心律失常药物。根据左心房直径(>45 毫米)、房颤持续时间(>1 年)和抗凝药物类型进行了分组分析。对左心房阑尾血栓溶解后的房颤患者进行了单变量和多变量逻辑回归分析,以评估中风和死亡风险。多变量逻辑回归分析发现,房颤持续时间(>1 年)、左心房直径(>45 毫米)和 BNP 水平是卒中的重要风险因素(P0.05)。与单独使用抗凝药物相比,射频消融联合抗凝药物治疗房颤伴左心房阑尾血栓溶解后似乎更有效。在早期患者管理中,关注房颤持续时间和左心房直径至关重要。不过,对于房颤合并左心房阑尾血栓患者,选择华法林还是 NOACs 还需要进一步研究。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
ACS Applied Bio Materials
ACS Applied Bio Materials Chemistry-Chemistry (all)
CiteScore
9.40
自引率
2.10%
发文量
464
期刊最新文献
A Systematic Review of Sleep Disturbance in Idiopathic Intracranial Hypertension. Advancing Patient Education in Idiopathic Intracranial Hypertension: The Promise of Large Language Models. Anti-Myelin-Associated Glycoprotein Neuropathy: Recent Developments. Approach to Managing the Initial Presentation of Multiple Sclerosis: A Worldwide Practice Survey. Association Between LACE+ Index Risk Category and 90-Day Mortality After Stroke.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1