{"title":"TEAM-CBT for Adolescents and Young Adults With Depression and Anxiety: Testing Short-Term Impact and Within-Session Change","authors":"Elise Bourgeois-Munoz, Jacqueline Corcoran","doi":"10.1016/j.cbpra.2024.05.005","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>The prevalence of mental health disorders has shown a notable rise in adolescents and young adults (Parodi et al., 2022). These developmental stages, adolescence and young adulthood, are peak periods for emerging mental health disorders, affecting around 49.5% of young individuals. Anxiety and depression have significant adverse and long-term effects that interfere with developmental tasks if not successfully treated (Merikangas, 2010).</div><div>An evidence-based model, TEAM-CBT, incorporates the following treatment components: testing, empathy, agenda setting, and methods. The model’s impact on depression and anxiety was tested in a naturalistic study of adolescent and young adult clients in a group practice setting. T-tests and ANOVAs were used to test treatment effects, including changes between the first and final sessions, within-session changes, and the treatment response pattern.</div><div>A total of <em>N</em> = 116 patients’ data was included in the analysis. Both depression and anxiety scores were significantly lower at posttest compared to pretest. The majority of adolescents and young adults achieved clinically significant improvement: 80% of youth no longer met criteria for clinically significant symptoms of depression symptoms, and 87% of youth for anxiety symptoms. No correlation was found between the number of sessions received and the treatment outcome. Within-session symptom reduction was clinically significant in each of the 10 sessions. The largest symptom reductions occurred over the first five sessions. Findings, recommendations, and implications are discussed.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":51511,"journal":{"name":"Cognitive and Behavioral Practice","volume":"33 1","pages":"Pages 1-14"},"PeriodicalIF":2.9000,"publicationDate":"2026-02-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Cognitive and Behavioral Practice","FirstCategoryId":"102","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1077722924000737","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"心理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"PSYCHOLOGY, CLINICAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
The prevalence of mental health disorders has shown a notable rise in adolescents and young adults (Parodi et al., 2022). These developmental stages, adolescence and young adulthood, are peak periods for emerging mental health disorders, affecting around 49.5% of young individuals. Anxiety and depression have significant adverse and long-term effects that interfere with developmental tasks if not successfully treated (Merikangas, 2010).
An evidence-based model, TEAM-CBT, incorporates the following treatment components: testing, empathy, agenda setting, and methods. The model’s impact on depression and anxiety was tested in a naturalistic study of adolescent and young adult clients in a group practice setting. T-tests and ANOVAs were used to test treatment effects, including changes between the first and final sessions, within-session changes, and the treatment response pattern.
A total of N = 116 patients’ data was included in the analysis. Both depression and anxiety scores were significantly lower at posttest compared to pretest. The majority of adolescents and young adults achieved clinically significant improvement: 80% of youth no longer met criteria for clinically significant symptoms of depression symptoms, and 87% of youth for anxiety symptoms. No correlation was found between the number of sessions received and the treatment outcome. Within-session symptom reduction was clinically significant in each of the 10 sessions. The largest symptom reductions occurred over the first five sessions. Findings, recommendations, and implications are discussed.
期刊介绍:
Cognitive and Behavioral Practice is a quarterly international journal that serves an enduring resource for empirically informed methods of clinical practice. Its mission is to bridge the gap between published research and the actual clinical practice of cognitive behavior therapy. Cognitive and Behavioral Practice publishes clinically rich accounts of innovative assessment and diagnostic and therapeutic procedures that are clearly grounded in empirical research. A focus on application and implementation of procedures is maintained.