Differences in preimplantation blastocyst chromosomal aberrations between polycystic ovary syndrome women and controls: a multi-center retrospective cohort study
Lu Luo, Wenjun Wang, Yan Xu, Yuanyuan Yang, Limei Zhang, Jun Gao, Jiayi Mai, Qiong Wang, Fei Gong
{"title":"Differences in preimplantation blastocyst chromosomal aberrations between polycystic ovary syndrome women and controls: a multi-center retrospective cohort study","authors":"Lu Luo, Wenjun Wang, Yan Xu, Yuanyuan Yang, Limei Zhang, Jun Gao, Jiayi Mai, Qiong Wang, Fei Gong","doi":"10.1007/s10815-024-03235-1","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<h3 data-test=\"abstract-sub-heading\">Purpose</h3><p>Comprehensive chromosomal status of blastocyst from women with polycystic ovary syndrome (PCOS) was limited. This study aimed to identify possible differences in the preimplantation blastocyst chromosome aberrations between PCOS women and controls receiving preimplantation genetic testing (PGT).</p><h3 data-test=\"abstract-sub-heading\">Methods</h3><p>This was a multi-center retrospective cohort study including a total of 707 blastocysts from 147 PCOS women and 3006 blastocysts from 821 control women receiving PGT between 2015 and 2021. Embryonic chromosomal aberration spectrums were compared between PCOS and controls. Mixed effects generalized linear model was conducted to explore possible influence of PCOS-related endocrinological disorders on embryonic chromosomal abnormalities.</p><h3 data-test=\"abstract-sub-heading\">Results</h3><p>Blastocysts from PCOS demonstrated significantly lower aneuploidy rate (15.2% vs. 25.2% per women, <i>P</i> < 0.001; 14.7% vs. 25.4% per blastocyst, <i>P</i> < 0.001) but greater mosaicism rate (12.5% vs. 8.0% per women, <i>P</i> = 0.007; 16.5% vs. 8.7% per blastocyst, <i>P</i> < 0.001). Mixed effects generalized linear model identified PCOS as an independent protective factor against embryonic aneuploidy (adjusted odds ratio = 0.68, 95% confidence interval, 0.50<i>–</i>0.93, <i>P</i> = 0.014) but a risk factor for embryonic mosaicism (adjusted odds ratio = 1.52, 95% confidence interval 1.11<i>–</i>2.10, <i>P</i> = 0.009). Further model analysis suggested that insulin resistance could be responsible for the increased risk of embryonic mosaicism among PCOS women (adjusted odds ratio = 2.17, 95% confidence interval, 1.10<i>–</i>4.31, <i>P</i> = 0.026).</p><h3 data-test=\"abstract-sub-heading\">Conclusion</h3><p>PCOS is associated with a lower aneuploidy risk but an increased mosaicism risk in preimplantation blastocysts, and insulin resistance should be investigated as a potential cause.</p>","PeriodicalId":3,"journal":{"name":"ACS Applied Electronic Materials","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":4.3000,"publicationDate":"2024-09-17","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"ACS Applied Electronic Materials","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s10815-024-03235-1","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"材料科学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ENGINEERING, ELECTRICAL & ELECTRONIC","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Purpose
Comprehensive chromosomal status of blastocyst from women with polycystic ovary syndrome (PCOS) was limited. This study aimed to identify possible differences in the preimplantation blastocyst chromosome aberrations between PCOS women and controls receiving preimplantation genetic testing (PGT).
Methods
This was a multi-center retrospective cohort study including a total of 707 blastocysts from 147 PCOS women and 3006 blastocysts from 821 control women receiving PGT between 2015 and 2021. Embryonic chromosomal aberration spectrums were compared between PCOS and controls. Mixed effects generalized linear model was conducted to explore possible influence of PCOS-related endocrinological disorders on embryonic chromosomal abnormalities.
Results
Blastocysts from PCOS demonstrated significantly lower aneuploidy rate (15.2% vs. 25.2% per women, P < 0.001; 14.7% vs. 25.4% per blastocyst, P < 0.001) but greater mosaicism rate (12.5% vs. 8.0% per women, P = 0.007; 16.5% vs. 8.7% per blastocyst, P < 0.001). Mixed effects generalized linear model identified PCOS as an independent protective factor against embryonic aneuploidy (adjusted odds ratio = 0.68, 95% confidence interval, 0.50–0.93, P = 0.014) but a risk factor for embryonic mosaicism (adjusted odds ratio = 1.52, 95% confidence interval 1.11–2.10, P = 0.009). Further model analysis suggested that insulin resistance could be responsible for the increased risk of embryonic mosaicism among PCOS women (adjusted odds ratio = 2.17, 95% confidence interval, 1.10–4.31, P = 0.026).
Conclusion
PCOS is associated with a lower aneuploidy risk but an increased mosaicism risk in preimplantation blastocysts, and insulin resistance should be investigated as a potential cause.