Effect of fasudil on clinical outcomes of pulmonary hypertension: a systematic review and meta-analysis.

IF 3.6 3区 医学 Q2 PHARMACOLOGY & PHARMACY Expert Review of Clinical Pharmacology Pub Date : 2024-09-13 DOI:10.1080/17512433.2024.2404688
Wanying Bao,Mengxin Cheng,Xiaoye Chen,Tao Wang,Dan Xu,Hualin Liao,Lei Chen,Fuqiang Wen,Junyun He,Jun Chen
{"title":"Effect of fasudil on clinical outcomes of pulmonary hypertension: a systematic review and meta-analysis.","authors":"Wanying Bao,Mengxin Cheng,Xiaoye Chen,Tao Wang,Dan Xu,Hualin Liao,Lei Chen,Fuqiang Wen,Junyun He,Jun Chen","doi":"10.1080/17512433.2024.2404688","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"BACKGROUND\r\nPulmonary hypertension (PH) is a life-threatening condition with high mortality, categorized into 5 Groups based on distinct etiologies. Fasudil, a potent vasodilator targeting the RhoA/Rho kinase pathway, holds promise for diverse PH pathologies. However, a comprehensive systematic evaluation of its clinical benefits remains elusive.\r\n\r\nMETHODS\r\nWe conducted a systematic search across several databases. Meta-analysis using odds ratio and mean difference was performed, with an assessment of studies' quality and pooled evidence.\r\n\r\nRESULTS\r\nStudies on Group-2 and -3 PH reports eligible data for meta-analysis. Inclusion of 3269 patients with Group-3 PH demonstrated that fasudil significantly increased effective events, FEV1, 6-minute walking distance (6MWD) and arterial PaO2, and decreased mean pulmonary artery pressure (mPAP) and pulmonary artery systolic pressure (PASP); Inclusion of 197 patients with Group-2 PH suggested that fasudil significantly increased 6MWD and PaO2, and decreased PASP. Subgroup analysis revealed no significant difference between dosages of 30 and 60 mg/day, while durations and methods of fasudil administration might affect therapeutic effectiveness in patients with Group-3 PH.\r\n\r\nCONCLUSIONS\r\nBy providing comprehensive and robust evidence, our study favor the beneficial effects of fasudil by enhancing FEV1, 6MWD and PaO2, and reducing mPAP and PASP on patients with Group-3 PH, suggesting fasudil as a viable treatment recommendation for these patients and highlighting the need for further studies to inform healthcare policies.\r\n\r\nPROTOCOL REGISTRATION\r\nwww.crd.york.ac.uk/prospero identifier is CRD42022308947.","PeriodicalId":12207,"journal":{"name":"Expert Review of Clinical Pharmacology","volume":"5 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":3.6000,"publicationDate":"2024-09-13","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Expert Review of Clinical Pharmacology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/17512433.2024.2404688","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"PHARMACOLOGY & PHARMACY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

BACKGROUND Pulmonary hypertension (PH) is a life-threatening condition with high mortality, categorized into 5 Groups based on distinct etiologies. Fasudil, a potent vasodilator targeting the RhoA/Rho kinase pathway, holds promise for diverse PH pathologies. However, a comprehensive systematic evaluation of its clinical benefits remains elusive. METHODS We conducted a systematic search across several databases. Meta-analysis using odds ratio and mean difference was performed, with an assessment of studies' quality and pooled evidence. RESULTS Studies on Group-2 and -3 PH reports eligible data for meta-analysis. Inclusion of 3269 patients with Group-3 PH demonstrated that fasudil significantly increased effective events, FEV1, 6-minute walking distance (6MWD) and arterial PaO2, and decreased mean pulmonary artery pressure (mPAP) and pulmonary artery systolic pressure (PASP); Inclusion of 197 patients with Group-2 PH suggested that fasudil significantly increased 6MWD and PaO2, and decreased PASP. Subgroup analysis revealed no significant difference between dosages of 30 and 60 mg/day, while durations and methods of fasudil administration might affect therapeutic effectiveness in patients with Group-3 PH. CONCLUSIONS By providing comprehensive and robust evidence, our study favor the beneficial effects of fasudil by enhancing FEV1, 6MWD and PaO2, and reducing mPAP and PASP on patients with Group-3 PH, suggesting fasudil as a viable treatment recommendation for these patients and highlighting the need for further studies to inform healthcare policies. PROTOCOL REGISTRATION www.crd.york.ac.uk/prospero identifier is CRD42022308947.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
法舒地尔对肺动脉高压临床疗效的影响:系统综述和荟萃分析。
背景肺动脉高压(PH)是一种威胁生命的疾病,死亡率很高,根据不同的病因可分为 5 类。法舒地尔是一种靶向 RhoA/Rho 激酶通路的强效血管扩张剂,有望治疗各种 PH 病症。方法我们在多个数据库中进行了系统性检索。结果关于第 2 组和第 3 组 PH 的研究报告符合荟萃分析的数据要求。纳入3269例3组PH患者的研究表明,法舒地尔能显著增加有效事件、FEV1、6分钟步行距离(6MWD)和动脉PaO2,降低平均肺动脉压(mPAP)和肺动脉收缩压(PASP);纳入197例2组PH患者的研究表明,法舒地尔能显著增加6MWD和PaO2,降低PASP。亚组分析显示,30 毫克/天和 60 毫克/天的剂量之间没有明显差异,而法舒地尔的用药时间和方法可能会影响第 3 组 PH 患者的疗效。结论通过提供全面而有力的证据,我们的研究支持法舒地尔通过提高FEV1、6MWD和PaO2,降低mPAP和PASP对3组PH患者的有益作用,建议将法舒地尔作为这些患者的可行治疗建议,并强调了进一步研究的必要性,以便为医疗保健政策提供信息。PROTOCOL REGISTRATIONwww.crd.york.ac.uk/prospero identifier is CRD42022308947.
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Expert Review of Clinical Pharmacology
Expert Review of Clinical Pharmacology PHARMACOLOGY & PHARMACY-
CiteScore
7.30
自引率
2.30%
发文量
127
期刊介绍: Advances in drug development technologies are yielding innovative new therapies, from potentially lifesaving medicines to lifestyle products. In recent years, however, the cost of developing new drugs has soared, and concerns over drug resistance and pharmacoeconomics have come to the fore. Adverse reactions experienced at the clinical trial level serve as a constant reminder of the importance of rigorous safety and toxicity testing. Furthermore the advent of pharmacogenomics and ‘individualized’ approaches to therapy will demand a fresh approach to drug evaluation and healthcare delivery. Clinical Pharmacology provides an essential role in integrating the expertise of all of the specialists and players who are active in meeting such challenges in modern biomedical practice.
期刊最新文献
A scoping review of the clinical utility of adverse drug reaction causality analysis tools for use in the hospital setting. Immune checkpoint inhibition of metastatic melanoma: achieving high efficacy in the face of high toxicity. The use of oral GnRH antagonist to inhibit the LH surge in women undergoing ovarian stimulation for in vitro fertilization. Population pharmacokinetics of nirmatrelvir/ritonavir in critically ill Chinese COVID-19 patients and recommendations for medication use: a two-center retrospective study. Methotrexate polyglutamates.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1