Jennifer H. Staab, Angela C. Yoder, John T. Brinton, Nicholas V. Stence, Claire E. Simonsen, Brianne F. Newman, Keely A. Garcia, Lorna P. Browne
{"title":"Child life specialists predict successful MRI scanning in unsedated children 4 to 12 years old","authors":"Jennifer H. Staab, Angela C. Yoder, John T. Brinton, Nicholas V. Stence, Claire E. Simonsen, Brianne F. Newman, Keely A. Garcia, Lorna P. Browne","doi":"10.1007/s00247-024-06040-1","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<h3 data-test=\"abstract-sub-heading\">Background</h3><p>It can be challenging for children to cooperate for a magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) exam. General anesthesia is often used to ensure a high-quality image. When determining the need for general anesthesia, many institutions use a simple age cutoff. Decisions on the necessity for anesthesia are often left to schedulers who lack training on determination of patient compliance.</p><h3 data-test=\"abstract-sub-heading\">Objective</h3><p>The study aimed to evaluate whether screening questions administered by certified child life specialists (CCLS) could successfully predict which children could complete an MRI without sedation.</p><h3 data-test=\"abstract-sub-heading\">Materials and methods</h3><p>This is a retrospective, institutional review board approved study. Data was collected as part of a quality improvement program, where a CCLS screened 4- to 12-year-old children scheduled for MRI scanning using a questionnaire. Parent responses to the screening questions, CCLS’s recommendation for scheduling the MRI awake, start and end time for the MRI scan, and scan success were recorded. A predictive model for the CCLS’s recommendation was developed using the child’s age, estimated scan length, scan difficulty, and the parent’s responses to the screening questions. The primary outcome measure was a successfully completed MRI not requiring additional imaging under anesthesia.</p><h3 data-test=\"abstract-sub-heading\">Results</h3><p>Of the 403 screened children, 317 (79%) were recommended to attempt the MRI without anesthesia. The median age of participants was 7 (IQR 4–17) years. Overall, 309 of 317 (97.5%) participants, recommended by the CCLS for the program, met the primary outcome of successful MRI completion on their first attempt. The multivariable regression model which included clinical information about the child’s age, estimated scan length, scan difficulty, and four of the six parent screening questions had excellent performance (area under the curve = 0.89).</p><h3 data-test=\"abstract-sub-heading\">Conclusion</h3><p>Information collected by the CCLS via screening along with the child’s age, the estimated scan length, and difficulty can help predict which children are likely to successfully complete a non-sedate MRI.</p><h3 data-test=\"abstract-sub-heading\">Graphical Abstract</h3>\n","PeriodicalId":19755,"journal":{"name":"Pediatric Radiology","volume":"95 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.1000,"publicationDate":"2024-09-18","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Pediatric Radiology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s00247-024-06040-1","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"PEDIATRICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Background
It can be challenging for children to cooperate for a magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) exam. General anesthesia is often used to ensure a high-quality image. When determining the need for general anesthesia, many institutions use a simple age cutoff. Decisions on the necessity for anesthesia are often left to schedulers who lack training on determination of patient compliance.
Objective
The study aimed to evaluate whether screening questions administered by certified child life specialists (CCLS) could successfully predict which children could complete an MRI without sedation.
Materials and methods
This is a retrospective, institutional review board approved study. Data was collected as part of a quality improvement program, where a CCLS screened 4- to 12-year-old children scheduled for MRI scanning using a questionnaire. Parent responses to the screening questions, CCLS’s recommendation for scheduling the MRI awake, start and end time for the MRI scan, and scan success were recorded. A predictive model for the CCLS’s recommendation was developed using the child’s age, estimated scan length, scan difficulty, and the parent’s responses to the screening questions. The primary outcome measure was a successfully completed MRI not requiring additional imaging under anesthesia.
Results
Of the 403 screened children, 317 (79%) were recommended to attempt the MRI without anesthesia. The median age of participants was 7 (IQR 4–17) years. Overall, 309 of 317 (97.5%) participants, recommended by the CCLS for the program, met the primary outcome of successful MRI completion on their first attempt. The multivariable regression model which included clinical information about the child’s age, estimated scan length, scan difficulty, and four of the six parent screening questions had excellent performance (area under the curve = 0.89).
Conclusion
Information collected by the CCLS via screening along with the child’s age, the estimated scan length, and difficulty can help predict which children are likely to successfully complete a non-sedate MRI.
期刊介绍:
Official Journal of the European Society of Pediatric Radiology, the Society for Pediatric Radiology and the Asian and Oceanic Society for Pediatric Radiology
Pediatric Radiology informs its readers of new findings and progress in all areas of pediatric imaging and in related fields. This is achieved by a blend of original papers, complemented by reviews that set out the present state of knowledge in a particular area of the specialty or summarize specific topics in which discussion has led to clear conclusions. Advances in technology, methodology, apparatus and auxiliary equipment are presented, and modifications of standard techniques are described.
Manuscripts submitted for publication must contain a statement to the effect that all human studies have been reviewed by the appropriate ethics committee and have therefore been performed in accordance with the ethical standards laid down in an appropriate version of the 1964 Declaration of Helsinki. It should also be stated clearly in the text that all persons gave their informed consent prior to their inclusion in the study. Details that might disclose the identity of the subjects under study should be omitted.