The role of time averaging of eddy covariance fluxes on water use efficiency dynamics of maize

IF 3.2 3区 地球科学 Q2 METEOROLOGY & ATMOSPHERIC SCIENCES Atmospheric Measurement Techniques Pub Date : 2024-09-16 DOI:10.5194/amt-17-5477-2024
Arun Rao Karimindla, Shweta Kumari, Saipriya S R, Syam Chintala, BVN P. Kambhammettu​​​​​​​
{"title":"The role of time averaging of eddy covariance fluxes on water use efficiency dynamics of maize","authors":"Arun Rao Karimindla, Shweta Kumari, Saipriya S R, Syam Chintala, BVN P. Kambhammettu​​​​​​​","doi":"10.5194/amt-17-5477-2024","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Abstract. Direct measurement of carbon and water fluxes at high frequencies make eddy covariance (EC) the technique most preferred to characterize water use efficiency (WUE). However, reliability of EC fluxes largely hinges on the energy balance ratio (EBR) and inclusion of low-frequency fluxes. This study is aimed at investigating the role of the averaging period in representing EC fluxes and its propagation into WUE dynamics. Carbon and water fluxes were monitored in a drip-irrigated maize field at 10 Hz frequency and were averaged over 1, 5, 10, 15, 30, 45, 60, and 120 min, considering daytime unstable conditions. The optimal averaging period to simulate WUE fluxes for each growth stage is obtained by considering cumulative frequency (Ogive) curves. A clear departure of EBR from unity was observed during the dough and maturity stages of the crop due to ignorance of canopy heat storage, low-frequency flux losses, and an inadequate averaging period. Deviations in representing water (carbon) fluxes relative to the conventional 30 min average are within ±3 % (±10 %) for 10–120 min averaging and beyond ±3 % (±10 %) for other time averages. Ogive plots show that the optimal averaging period to represent carbon, water, and WUE fluxes is 15–30 min for the sixth leaf and silking stages and is 45–60 min for the dough and maturity stages. Dynamics of WUE considering optimal averaging periods are in the range of μ ± σ: 1.49 ± 0.95, 1.37 ± 0.74, 1.39 ± 0.79, and 3.06 ± 0.69 µmol mmol−1 for the sixth leaf, silking, dough, and maturity stages, respectively. The error in representing WUE by conventional 30 min averaging is marginal (< 1.5 %) throughout the crop period except for the dough stage (12.12 %). We conclude that the conventional 30 min averaging of EC fluxes is not appropriate for representing WUE throughout the crop period. Our findings can help to develop efficient water management strategies by accurately characterizing WUE fluxes from the EC measurements.","PeriodicalId":8619,"journal":{"name":"Atmospheric Measurement Techniques","volume":"39 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":3.2000,"publicationDate":"2024-09-16","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Atmospheric Measurement Techniques","FirstCategoryId":"89","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.5194/amt-17-5477-2024","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"地球科学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"METEOROLOGY & ATMOSPHERIC SCIENCES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Abstract. Direct measurement of carbon and water fluxes at high frequencies make eddy covariance (EC) the technique most preferred to characterize water use efficiency (WUE). However, reliability of EC fluxes largely hinges on the energy balance ratio (EBR) and inclusion of low-frequency fluxes. This study is aimed at investigating the role of the averaging period in representing EC fluxes and its propagation into WUE dynamics. Carbon and water fluxes were monitored in a drip-irrigated maize field at 10 Hz frequency and were averaged over 1, 5, 10, 15, 30, 45, 60, and 120 min, considering daytime unstable conditions. The optimal averaging period to simulate WUE fluxes for each growth stage is obtained by considering cumulative frequency (Ogive) curves. A clear departure of EBR from unity was observed during the dough and maturity stages of the crop due to ignorance of canopy heat storage, low-frequency flux losses, and an inadequate averaging period. Deviations in representing water (carbon) fluxes relative to the conventional 30 min average are within ±3 % (±10 %) for 10–120 min averaging and beyond ±3 % (±10 %) for other time averages. Ogive plots show that the optimal averaging period to represent carbon, water, and WUE fluxes is 15–30 min for the sixth leaf and silking stages and is 45–60 min for the dough and maturity stages. Dynamics of WUE considering optimal averaging periods are in the range of μ ± σ: 1.49 ± 0.95, 1.37 ± 0.74, 1.39 ± 0.79, and 3.06 ± 0.69 µmol mmol−1 for the sixth leaf, silking, dough, and maturity stages, respectively. The error in representing WUE by conventional 30 min averaging is marginal (< 1.5 %) throughout the crop period except for the dough stage (12.12 %). We conclude that the conventional 30 min averaging of EC fluxes is not appropriate for representing WUE throughout the crop period. Our findings can help to develop efficient water management strategies by accurately characterizing WUE fluxes from the EC measurements.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
涡协方差通量的时间平均化对玉米水分利用效率动态的影响
摘要直接测量高频碳通量和水通量使涡度协方差(EC)成为描述水分利用效率(WUE)的首选技术。然而,EC 通量的可靠性在很大程度上取决于能量平衡比(EBR)和低频通量。本研究旨在探讨平均周期在代表 EC 通量方面的作用及其在 WUE 动态中的传播。考虑到白天的不稳定条件,在滴灌玉米田中以 10 赫兹的频率监测碳通量和水通量,并在 1、5、10、15、30、45、60 和 120 分钟内取平均值。通过考虑累积频率(Ogive)曲线,得出了模拟每个生长阶段 WUE 流量的最佳平均周期。由于忽略了冠层蓄热、低频通量损失和平均期不足,在作物的面团期和成熟期观察到 EBR 明显偏离统一值。相对于传统的 30 分钟平均值,10-120 分钟平均值的水(碳)通量偏差在 ±3 %(±10 %)以内,而其他时间平均值的偏差则超过 ±3 %(±10 %)。曲线图显示,代表碳、水和 WUE 通量的最佳平均时间段在第六片叶和抽丝阶段为 15-30 分钟,在面团和成熟阶段为 45-60 分钟。考虑到最佳平均期,WUE 的动态范围为 μ ± σ:六叶期、生丝期、面团期和成熟期的 WUE 动态值分别为 1.49 ± 0.95、1.37 ± 0.74、1.39 ± 0.79 和 3.06 ± 0.69 µmol mmol-1。除面团期(12.12%)外,传统的 30 分钟平均法在整个作物期表示 WUE 的误差很小(< 1.5%)。我们的结论是,传统的 30 分钟平均分配 EC 通量的方法不适合用来表示作物整个生长期的水分利用效率。我们的研究结果有助于通过EC测量值准确描述WUE通量,从而制定高效的水分管理策略。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Atmospheric Measurement Techniques
Atmospheric Measurement Techniques METEOROLOGY & ATMOSPHERIC SCIENCES-
CiteScore
7.10
自引率
18.40%
发文量
331
审稿时长
3 months
期刊介绍: Atmospheric Measurement Techniques (AMT) is an international scientific journal dedicated to the publication and discussion of advances in remote sensing, in-situ and laboratory measurement techniques for the constituents and properties of the Earth’s atmosphere. The main subject areas comprise the development, intercomparison and validation of measurement instruments and techniques of data processing and information retrieval for gases, aerosols, and clouds. The manuscript types considered for peer-reviewed publication are research articles, review articles, and commentaries.
期刊最新文献
Analyzing the chemical composition, morphology and size of ice-nucleating particles by coupling a scanning electron microscope to an offline diffusion chamber Wet-Radome Attenuation in ARM Cloud Radars and Its Utilization in Radar Calibration Using Disdrometer Measurements Chilean Observation Network De MeteOr Radars (CONDOR): Multi-Static System Configuration & Wind Comparison with Co-located Lidar Benchmarking KDP in Rainfall: A Quantitative Assessment of Estimation Algorithms Using C-Band Weather Radar Observations Advances in OH reactivity instruments for airborne field measurements
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1