Risk of second revision and mortality following first-time revision due to prosthetic joint infection after primary total hip arthroplasty: results on 1,669 patients from the Danish Hip Arthroplasty Register.

IF 2.5 2区 医学 Q1 ORTHOPEDICS Acta Orthopaedica Pub Date : 2024-09-13 DOI:10.2340/17453674.2024.41913
Rajzan Joanroy,Sophie Gubbels,Jens K Møller,Søren Overgaard,Claus Varnum
{"title":"Risk of second revision and mortality following first-time revision due to prosthetic joint infection after primary total hip arthroplasty: results on 1,669 patients from the Danish Hip Arthroplasty Register.","authors":"Rajzan Joanroy,Sophie Gubbels,Jens K Møller,Søren Overgaard,Claus Varnum","doi":"10.2340/17453674.2024.41913","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE\r\nProsthetic joint infection (PJI) following total hip arthroplasty (THA) has a severe impact on patients. We investigated the risk of second revision and mortality following first-time revision due to PJI.\r\n\r\nMETHODS\r\nWe identified 1,669 first-time revisions including 416 treated with debridement, antibiotics, and implant retention (DAIR) from the Danish Hip Arthroplasty Register (DHR). First-time revision due to PJI was defined as a revision with ≥ 2 culture-positive biopsies for the same bacteria or re-ported as PJI to the DHR within 1 year after primary THA with non-PJI revisions as controls. We retrieved information on Charlson Comorbidity Index (CCI), death, cohabitation status, and cultures from intraoperative biopsies. The adjusted relative risk (RR) with 95% confidence interval (CI) was calculated by first-time revision (PJI or non-PJI). Patients were followed from first-time revision until end of study.\r\n\r\nRESULTS\r\nPJI was found in 140 of 280 patients having a second revision following any first-time revision. Of these 280 patients, 200 were treated with DAIR as second revision. Patients with first-time revision due to PJI had an increased risk of second revision compared with first-time revision for non-PJI with an adjusted RR for second revision due to any cause of 2.7 (CI 1.9-3.8) and second revision due to PJI of 6.3 (CI 4.0-10). The 10-year adjusted RR for mortality for patients with first-time revision due to PJI compared with non-PJI was 1.8 (CI 0.7-4.5).\r\n\r\nCONCLUSION\r\nThe risk of second revision was increased both for second revision due to any reason and due to PJI following first-time revision due to PJI. Mortality risk following first-time revision due to PJI was increased, but not statistically significant.","PeriodicalId":6916,"journal":{"name":"Acta Orthopaedica","volume":"1 1","pages":"524-529"},"PeriodicalIF":2.5000,"publicationDate":"2024-09-13","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Acta Orthopaedica","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2340/17453674.2024.41913","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ORTHOPEDICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE Prosthetic joint infection (PJI) following total hip arthroplasty (THA) has a severe impact on patients. We investigated the risk of second revision and mortality following first-time revision due to PJI. METHODS We identified 1,669 first-time revisions including 416 treated with debridement, antibiotics, and implant retention (DAIR) from the Danish Hip Arthroplasty Register (DHR). First-time revision due to PJI was defined as a revision with ≥ 2 culture-positive biopsies for the same bacteria or re-ported as PJI to the DHR within 1 year after primary THA with non-PJI revisions as controls. We retrieved information on Charlson Comorbidity Index (CCI), death, cohabitation status, and cultures from intraoperative biopsies. The adjusted relative risk (RR) with 95% confidence interval (CI) was calculated by first-time revision (PJI or non-PJI). Patients were followed from first-time revision until end of study. RESULTS PJI was found in 140 of 280 patients having a second revision following any first-time revision. Of these 280 patients, 200 were treated with DAIR as second revision. Patients with first-time revision due to PJI had an increased risk of second revision compared with first-time revision for non-PJI with an adjusted RR for second revision due to any cause of 2.7 (CI 1.9-3.8) and second revision due to PJI of 6.3 (CI 4.0-10). The 10-year adjusted RR for mortality for patients with first-time revision due to PJI compared with non-PJI was 1.8 (CI 0.7-4.5). CONCLUSION The risk of second revision was increased both for second revision due to any reason and due to PJI following first-time revision due to PJI. Mortality risk following first-time revision due to PJI was increased, but not statistically significant.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
初次全髋关节置换术后因假体关节感染而进行首次翻修后的二次翻修风险和死亡率:丹麦髋关节置换术登记处 1,669 名患者的研究结果。
背景和目的全髋关节置换术(THA)后假体关节感染(PJI)对患者有严重影响。我们从丹麦髋关节置换术登记(DHR)中确定了 1,669 例首次翻修患者,其中包括 416 例接受清创、抗生素和植入物保留(DAIR)治疗的患者。因 PJI 导致的首次翻修定义为:在初次 THA 后 1 年内,同一细菌的培养活检结果≥ 2 次阳性,或作为 PJI 再次向 DHR 报告的翻修,以非 PJI 翻修为对照。我们检索了 Charlson 生病指数 (CCI)、死亡、同居状况和术中活检培养的信息。按首次翻修(PJI 或非 PJI)计算调整后的相对风险 (RR),并得出 95% 的置信区间 (CI)。研究结果280名患者中,有140名患者在首次翻修后进行了第二次翻修,发现了PJI。在这 280 例患者中,有 200 例在第二次翻修时接受了 DAIR 治疗。与因非 PJI 而进行首次翻修的患者相比,因 PJI 而进行首次翻修的患者进行二次翻修的风险更高,因任何原因进行二次翻修的调整 RR 为 2.7(CI 1.9-3.8),因 PJI 而进行二次翻修的调整 RR 为 6.3(CI 4.0-10)。与非 PJI 患者相比,因 PJI 而进行首次翻修的患者的 10 年调整死亡率为 1.8 (CI 0.7-4.5)。结论在因 PJI 而进行首次翻修后,因任何原因和因 PJI 而进行第二次翻修的风险都会增加。PJI导致的首次翻修后的死亡率风险增加,但无统计学意义。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Acta Orthopaedica
Acta Orthopaedica 医学-整形外科
CiteScore
6.40
自引率
8.10%
发文量
105
审稿时长
4-8 weeks
期刊介绍: Acta Orthopaedica (previously Acta Orthopaedica Scandinavica) presents original articles of basic research interest, as well as clinical studies in the field of orthopedics and related sub disciplines. Ever since the journal was founded in 1930, by a group of Scandinavian orthopedic surgeons, the journal has been published for an international audience. Acta Orthopaedica is owned by the Nordic Orthopaedic Federation and is the official publication of this federation.
期刊最新文献
Acute treatment of elderly patients with acetabular fractures by open reduction, internal fixation, and total hip arthroplasty: a 1-10-year follow-up of 48 patients. Incidence and risk factors of adverse events after distal radius fracture fixation with volar locking plates: retrospective analysis of 2,790 cases. The completeness of national hip and knee replacement registers. Can KOOS-PS be replaced with a simple anchor question in patients after total knee arthroplasty?: an agreement study of 2,478 primary surgeries. Erratum: Regional variation in low-value musculoskeletal surgery: a nationwide study from the Finnish Care Register.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1