Perforator Selection with Computed Tomography Angiography for Unilateral Breast Reconstruction: A Clinical Multicentre Analysis

Q4 Medicine Medicina Pub Date : 2024-09-14 DOI:10.3390/medicina60091500
Ishith Seth, Bryan Lim, Robert Phan, Yi Xie, Peter Sinkjær Kenney, William E. Bukret, Jørn Bo Thomsen, Roberto Cuomo, Richard J. Ross, Sally Kiu-Huen Ng, Warren M. Rozen
{"title":"Perforator Selection with Computed Tomography Angiography for Unilateral Breast Reconstruction: A Clinical Multicentre Analysis","authors":"Ishith Seth, Bryan Lim, Robert Phan, Yi Xie, Peter Sinkjær Kenney, William E. Bukret, Jørn Bo Thomsen, Roberto Cuomo, Richard J. Ross, Sally Kiu-Huen Ng, Warren M. Rozen","doi":"10.3390/medicina60091500","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Background and Objectives: Despite CTAs being critical for preoperative planning in autologous breast reconstruction, experienced plastic surgeons may have differing preferences for which side of the abdomen to use for unilateral breast reconstruction. Large language models (LLMs) have the potential to assist medical imaging interpretation. This study compares the perforator selection preferences of experienced plastic surgeons with four popular LLMs based on CTA images for breast reconstruction. Materials and Methods: Six experienced plastic surgeons from Australia, the US, Italy, Denmark, and Argentina reviewed ten CTA images, indicated their preferred side of the abdomen for unilateral breast reconstruction and recommended the type of autologous reconstruction. The LLMs were prompted to do the same. The average decisions were calculated, recorded in suitable tables, and compared. Results: The six consultants predominantly recommend the DIEP procedure (83%). This suggests experienced surgeons feel more comfortable raising DIEP than TRAM flaps, which they recommended only 3% of the time. They also favoured MS TRAM and SIEA less frequently (11% and 2%, respectively). Three LLMs—ChatGPT-4o, ChatGPT-4, and Bing CoPilot—exclusively recommended DIEP (100%), while Claude suggested DIEP 90% and MS TRAM 10%. Despite minor variations in side recommendations, consultants and AI models clearly preferred DIEP. Conclusions: Consultants and LLMs consistently preferred DIEP procedures, indicating strong confidence among experienced surgeons, though LLMs occasionally deviated in recommendations, highlighting limitations in their image interpretation capabilities. This emphasises the need for ongoing refinement of AI-assisted decision support systems to ensure they align more closely with expert clinical judgment and enhance their reliability in clinical practice.","PeriodicalId":18512,"journal":{"name":"Medicina","volume":"29 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-09-14","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Medicina","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3390/medicina60091500","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"Medicine","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background and Objectives: Despite CTAs being critical for preoperative planning in autologous breast reconstruction, experienced plastic surgeons may have differing preferences for which side of the abdomen to use for unilateral breast reconstruction. Large language models (LLMs) have the potential to assist medical imaging interpretation. This study compares the perforator selection preferences of experienced plastic surgeons with four popular LLMs based on CTA images for breast reconstruction. Materials and Methods: Six experienced plastic surgeons from Australia, the US, Italy, Denmark, and Argentina reviewed ten CTA images, indicated their preferred side of the abdomen for unilateral breast reconstruction and recommended the type of autologous reconstruction. The LLMs were prompted to do the same. The average decisions were calculated, recorded in suitable tables, and compared. Results: The six consultants predominantly recommend the DIEP procedure (83%). This suggests experienced surgeons feel more comfortable raising DIEP than TRAM flaps, which they recommended only 3% of the time. They also favoured MS TRAM and SIEA less frequently (11% and 2%, respectively). Three LLMs—ChatGPT-4o, ChatGPT-4, and Bing CoPilot—exclusively recommended DIEP (100%), while Claude suggested DIEP 90% and MS TRAM 10%. Despite minor variations in side recommendations, consultants and AI models clearly preferred DIEP. Conclusions: Consultants and LLMs consistently preferred DIEP procedures, indicating strong confidence among experienced surgeons, though LLMs occasionally deviated in recommendations, highlighting limitations in their image interpretation capabilities. This emphasises the need for ongoing refinement of AI-assisted decision support systems to ensure they align more closely with expert clinical judgment and enhance their reliability in clinical practice.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
通过计算机断层扫描血管造影为单侧乳房重建选择穿孔器:多中心临床分析
背景和目的:尽管 CTA 对自体乳房重建的术前规划至关重要,但经验丰富的整形外科医生可能对单侧乳房重建使用哪一侧腹部有不同的偏好。大语言模型(LLM)有可能帮助医学影像解读。本研究根据乳房重建的 CTA 图像,比较了经验丰富的整形外科医生对穿孔器选择的偏好和四种流行的 LLM。材料和方法:来自澳大利亚、美国、意大利、丹麦和阿根廷的六位经验丰富的整形外科医生查看了十张 CTA 图像,指出了他们对单侧乳房重建的首选腹侧,并推荐了自体重建的类型。LLM 也被提示做同样的事情。计算出平均决定,记录在合适的表格中,并进行比较。结果:六位顾问主要推荐 DIEP 手术(83%)。这表明,经验丰富的外科医生认为 DIEP 比 TRAM 皮瓣更适合,而他们推荐 TRAM 皮瓣的比例仅为 3%。他们对 MS TRAM 和 SIEA 的青睐程度也较低(分别为 11% 和 2%)。三位 LLM-ChatGPT-4o、ChatGPT-4 和 Bing CoPilot 只推荐 DIEP(100%),而 Claude 推荐 DIEP 占 90%,MS TRAM 占 10%。尽管双方的建议略有不同,但顾问和人工智能模型显然更倾向于 DIEP。结论:顾问和 LLM 始终倾向于 DIEP 手术,这表明经验丰富的外科医生对 DIEP 有很强的信心,尽管 LLM 偶尔会在建议中出现偏差,这突出了他们在图像解读能力方面的局限性。这强调了不断完善人工智能辅助决策支持系统的必要性,以确保它们与专家的临床判断更加一致,并提高它们在临床实践中的可靠性。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Medicina
Medicina Medicine-Medicine (all)
CiteScore
0.10
自引率
0.00%
发文量
66
审稿时长
24 weeks
期刊介绍: Publicada con el apoyo del Ministerio de Ciencia, Tecnología e Innovación Productiva. Medicina no tiene propósitos comerciales. El objeto de su creación ha sido propender al adelanto de la medicina argentina. Los beneficios que pudieran obtenerse serán aplicados exclusivamente a ese fin.
期刊最新文献
Insights into the Two Most Common Cancers of Primitive Gut-Derived Structures and Their Microbial Connections Intravital Position Study of the Clinical Anatomy of the Middle Lobe and Superior Poles of the Thyroid Gland An Analysis of Emergency Surgical Outcomes for Pediatric Traumatic Brain Injury: A Ten-Year Single-Institute Retrospective Study in Taiwan Evaluation of Left Atrial Electromechanical Delay and Left Atrial Phasic Functions in Patients Undergoing Treatment with Cardiotoxic Chemotherapeutic Agents Self-Reported Gastrointestinal Symptoms Associated with NSAIDs and Caffeine Consumption in a Jordanian Subpopulation
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1