Leveraging graph-based learning for credit card fraud detection: a comparative study of classical, deep learning and graph-based approaches

Sunisha Harish, Chirag Lakhanpal, Amir Hossein Jafari
{"title":"Leveraging graph-based learning for credit card fraud detection: a comparative study of classical, deep learning and graph-based approaches","authors":"Sunisha Harish, Chirag Lakhanpal, Amir Hossein Jafari","doi":"10.1007/s00521-024-10397-7","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p>Credit card fraud results in staggering financial losses amounting to billions of dollars annually, impacting both merchants and consumers. In light of the escalating prevalence of digital crime and online fraud, it is important for organizations to implement robust and advanced technology to efficiently detect fraud and mitigate the issue. Contemporary solutions heavily rely on classical machine learning (ML) and deep learning (DL) methods to handle such tasks. While these methods have been effective in many aspects of fraud detection, they may not always be sufficient for credit card fraud detection as they aren’t adaptable to detect complex relationships when it comes to transactions. Fraudsters, for example, might set up many coordinated accounts to avoid triggering limitations on individual accounts. In the context of fraud detection, the ability of Graph Neural Networks (GNN’s) to aggregate information contained within the local neighbourhood of a transaction enables them to identify larger patterns that may be missed by just looking at a single transaction. In this research, we conduct a thorough analysis to evaluate the effectiveness of GNNs in improving fraud detection over classical ML and DL methods. We first build an heterogeneous graph architecture with the source, transaction, and destination as our nodes. Next, we leverage Relational Graph Convolutional Network (RGCN) to learn the representations of nodes in our graph and perform node classification on the transaction node. Our experimental results demonstrate that GNN’s outperform classical ML and DL methods.</p>","PeriodicalId":18925,"journal":{"name":"Neural Computing and Applications","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-09-17","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Neural Computing and Applications","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s00521-024-10397-7","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Credit card fraud results in staggering financial losses amounting to billions of dollars annually, impacting both merchants and consumers. In light of the escalating prevalence of digital crime and online fraud, it is important for organizations to implement robust and advanced technology to efficiently detect fraud and mitigate the issue. Contemporary solutions heavily rely on classical machine learning (ML) and deep learning (DL) methods to handle such tasks. While these methods have been effective in many aspects of fraud detection, they may not always be sufficient for credit card fraud detection as they aren’t adaptable to detect complex relationships when it comes to transactions. Fraudsters, for example, might set up many coordinated accounts to avoid triggering limitations on individual accounts. In the context of fraud detection, the ability of Graph Neural Networks (GNN’s) to aggregate information contained within the local neighbourhood of a transaction enables them to identify larger patterns that may be missed by just looking at a single transaction. In this research, we conduct a thorough analysis to evaluate the effectiveness of GNNs in improving fraud detection over classical ML and DL methods. We first build an heterogeneous graph architecture with the source, transaction, and destination as our nodes. Next, we leverage Relational Graph Convolutional Network (RGCN) to learn the representations of nodes in our graph and perform node classification on the transaction node. Our experimental results demonstrate that GNN’s outperform classical ML and DL methods.

Abstract Image

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Potential analysis of radiographic images to determine infestation of rice seeds Recommendation systems with user and item profiles based on symbolic modal data End-to-end entity extraction from OCRed texts using summarization models Firearm detection using DETR with multiple self-coordinated neural networks Automated defect identification in coherent diffraction imaging with smart continual learning
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1