Plasma Adsorption with the MTx.100 Column in Critically Ill COVID-19 Patients: A Prospective Study and Propensity Score Analysis

IF 3 3区 医学 Q2 CRITICAL CARE MEDICINE Journal of Intensive Care Medicine Pub Date : 2024-09-14 DOI:10.1177/08850666241280031
Christopher Choi, Nicole De Simone, Christopher B. Webb, Peiman Lahsaei, Sean G. Yates, Jay S. Raval, Michelle S. Harkins, Donald J. Hillebrand, Antonio Belli, Nicolas A. Schlapobersky, Tina S. Ipe, Grace C. Banez-Sese, Vikramjit S. Khangoora, Steven D. Nathan, Trudy M. Demko, David C. Young, Sigalit Caron, Ravi Sarode
{"title":"Plasma Adsorption with the MTx.100 Column in Critically Ill COVID-19 Patients: A Prospective Study and Propensity Score Analysis","authors":"Christopher Choi, Nicole De Simone, Christopher B. Webb, Peiman Lahsaei, Sean G. Yates, Jay S. Raval, Michelle S. Harkins, Donald J. Hillebrand, Antonio Belli, Nicolas A. Schlapobersky, Tina S. Ipe, Grace C. Banez-Sese, Vikramjit S. Khangoora, Steven D. Nathan, Trudy M. Demko, David C. Young, Sigalit Caron, Ravi Sarode","doi":"10.1177/08850666241280031","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"BackgroundEarly in the COVID-19 pandemic, patients with severe disease admitted to the intensive care unit (ICU) had a high incidence of mortality. We aimed to investigate whether plasma adsorption with the MTx.100 Column could improve survival.MethodsWe performed a prospective, single-arm, multicenter, Emergency Use Authorization (EUA) trial in patients admitted to the ICU with severe COVID-19 who were worsening despite standard therapy. The primary outcome was all-cause mortality on day 28. Outcomes were analyzed using both a pre-specified performance goal (PG), and a propensity score-matched (PSM) analysis from the highest enrolling center, in which patients treated with the standard of care (SOC) plus the MTx.100 Column (n = 70) were compared to a contemporaneous cohort treated at the same center with SOC only (n = 244).FindingsBetween May 21, 2020, and November 2, 2021, 107 patients with severe COVID-19 (mean age 58.1) at 7 US centers were enrolled and had at least one plasma adsorption treatment initiated. All-cause mortality on day 28 was 37.4% (40/107), an improvement over the prespecified PG (88.1%, p < 0.0001). There were no serious adverse events attributable to the MTx.100 Column or plasmapheresis. Improvements in most metabolic and inflammatory markers were also noted. The PSM analysis showed that survival odds were three times higher for MTx.100 Column-treated patients (95% CI: 1.56-5.88) than for those treated with SOC only.InterpretationThe MTx.100 Column treatment in severe COVID-19 resulted in a lower mortality than SOC by both pre-specified PG and PSM analysis.Trial Registrationclinicaltrials.gov (NCT04358003).","PeriodicalId":16307,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Intensive Care Medicine","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":3.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-09-14","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Intensive Care Medicine","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/08850666241280031","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"CRITICAL CARE MEDICINE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

BackgroundEarly in the COVID-19 pandemic, patients with severe disease admitted to the intensive care unit (ICU) had a high incidence of mortality. We aimed to investigate whether plasma adsorption with the MTx.100 Column could improve survival.MethodsWe performed a prospective, single-arm, multicenter, Emergency Use Authorization (EUA) trial in patients admitted to the ICU with severe COVID-19 who were worsening despite standard therapy. The primary outcome was all-cause mortality on day 28. Outcomes were analyzed using both a pre-specified performance goal (PG), and a propensity score-matched (PSM) analysis from the highest enrolling center, in which patients treated with the standard of care (SOC) plus the MTx.100 Column (n = 70) were compared to a contemporaneous cohort treated at the same center with SOC only (n = 244).FindingsBetween May 21, 2020, and November 2, 2021, 107 patients with severe COVID-19 (mean age 58.1) at 7 US centers were enrolled and had at least one plasma adsorption treatment initiated. All-cause mortality on day 28 was 37.4% (40/107), an improvement over the prespecified PG (88.1%, p < 0.0001). There were no serious adverse events attributable to the MTx.100 Column or plasmapheresis. Improvements in most metabolic and inflammatory markers were also noted. The PSM analysis showed that survival odds were three times higher for MTx.100 Column-treated patients (95% CI: 1.56-5.88) than for those treated with SOC only.InterpretationThe MTx.100 Column treatment in severe COVID-19 resulted in a lower mortality than SOC by both pre-specified PG and PSM analysis.Trial Registrationclinicaltrials.gov (NCT04358003).
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
重症 COVID-19 患者使用 MTx.100 柱进行血浆吸附:前瞻性研究和倾向得分分析
背景在 COVID-19 大流行初期,重症监护室(ICU)收治的重症患者死亡率很高。我们的目的是研究使用 MTx.100 柱吸附血浆是否能提高生存率。方法我们在重症监护室收治的 COVID-19 重症患者中开展了一项前瞻性、单臂、多中心、紧急使用授权(EUA)试验,这些患者在接受标准治疗后病情仍在恶化。主要结果是第28天的全因死亡率。结果分析采用了预先指定的绩效目标 (PG) 和来自最高入组中心的倾向得分匹配 (PSM) 分析,其中患者接受了标准护理 (SOC) 加 MTx.100 治疗。研究结果在 2020 年 5 月 21 日至 2021 年 11 月 2 日期间,美国 7 个中心的 107 名重症 COVID-19 患者(平均年龄 58.1 岁)入组并接受了至少一次血浆吸附治疗。第28天的全因死亡率为37.4%(40/107),比预设的PG值(88.1%,p <0.0001)有所提高。MTx.100 柱或血浆置换术未导致严重不良事件。大多数代谢和炎症指标也有所改善。PSM分析显示,接受MTx.100柱治疗的患者的生存几率(95% CI:1.56-5.88)比仅接受SOC治疗的患者高三倍。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Journal of Intensive Care Medicine
Journal of Intensive Care Medicine CRITICAL CARE MEDICINE-
CiteScore
7.60
自引率
3.20%
发文量
107
期刊介绍: Journal of Intensive Care Medicine (JIC) is a peer-reviewed bi-monthly journal offering medical and surgical clinicians in adult and pediatric intensive care state-of-the-art, broad-based analytic reviews and updates, original articles, reports of large clinical series, techniques and procedures, topic-specific electronic resources, book reviews, and editorials on all aspects of intensive/critical/coronary care.
期刊最新文献
Development of an Extended Cardiovascular SOFA Score Component Reflecting Cardiac Dysfunction with Improved Survival Prediction in Sepsis: An Exploratory Analysis in the Sepsis and Elevated Troponin (SET) Study. Myoclonus After Cardiac Arrest did not Correlate with Cortical Response on Somatosensory Evoked Potentials. Predicting Parental Post-Traumatic Stress Symptoms Following their Child's Stay in a Pediatric Intensive Care Unit, Prior to Discharge. Intubation and Mechanical Ventilation in Patients with Acute Pulmonary Embolism: A Scoping Review. Effect of Extended Prone Positioning in Intubated COVID-19 Patients with Acute Respiratory Distress Syndrome, a Revision Letter.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1